Skip to the content

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

physicsworld.com's multimedia channel features exclusive video interviews with leading figures in the physics community.

Visit our multimedia channel to see the latest video.

Share this

Blog

Should you win a Nobel if your views aren’t always conventional?

By Hamish Johnston

There’s just 18 hours and 21 minutes until the physics Nobel is announced – or so says the tacky countdown on the Nobel Foundation website.

So there’s time for just one more Nobel-related blog entry.

Yesterday’s Observer had an interesting article about the British astrophysicist Fred Hoyle, who famously didn’t share the 1983 Nobel Prize in Physics with Willy Fowler and Subramanyan Chandrasekhar.

Fowler bagged his half for his work on nucleosynthesis – the process by which stars create heavy elements out of hydrogen. He was apparently shocked to learn that his long-time collaborator Hoyle was snubbed by the Nobel committee.

Why? According to the science writer Robin McKie, it’s because Hoyle believed, among other things, that outbreaks of flu are sometimes caused by microbes from outer space.

Should you win a Nobel if your views aren’t always conventional? The answer is apparently no.

You can read more here.

 

Posted by Hamish Johnston on Oct 4, 2010 4:21 PM |

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.iop.org/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/3871

Comments (3)

  • 1 Kasuha Oct 4, 2010 10:43 PM

    According to Alfred Nobel's will, the Nobel Prizes in Physics should be given "to the person who shall have made the most important 'discovery' or 'invention' within the field of physics." (see Wikipedia). The winner therefore does not have to be perfect, it's his discovery or invention that should count.
    Even though rules for recognition are constantly changing due to practical reasons, I believe they still should stick to this one point.

  • 2 Chaz Oct 5, 2010 12:59 AM

    Hello? Philipp Lenard? William Shockley? Brian Josephson? Kary Mullis?

    So, um, yeah, controversial views don't disqualify you from a Nobel. Period.

  • 3 deepak Oct 6, 2010 12:59 AM

    It wasn't the microbe theory. Hoyle was one of the co-founders, with Jayant Narlikar, of the steady state theory in cosmology. 1983. Guth's work had just come out two years before and the Big-Bang model had become the star of the show. Steady state cosmology was considered discredited and not-"respectable", much like some other theories are at present.

    That was the unconventional point of view which the Nobel committee couldn't digest.