Schmekel was asked to translate the paper by Neil Ashcroft, the distinguished theoretical condensed matter physicist at Cornell University. "I was giving a colloquium on superconductivity in the Spring of this year," says Ashcroft, "and since we are celebrating the centenary of Einstein's work in 1905, I thought it could be historically informative, and also interesting, to dig through the older literature to see if Einstein had contributed to the theory of superconductivity."

"After quite some effort, I finally located a reference to the 1922 paper by Einstein and thought it surely must have been translated," he recalls. However, Ashcroft could not find any translations of the article, which was based on a talk that Einstein had given at Leiden University in the Netherlands. Superconductivity was discovered by Heike Kamerlingh Onnes at Leiden in 1911.

Pat Viele, a librarian at Cornell, suggested that Ashcroft approach Schmekel, who was a graduate student in theoretical astrophysics at Cornell at the time, and he duly agreed to translate it. "When I read it I was struck by the extreme clarity of thought," says Schmekel. "The translation took only one afternoon."

So did the paper have any influence on our understanding of superconductivity? "I suspect that the general answer to this question must be a guarded 'No'," says Ashcroft, "otherwise the paper would surely have been referenced, and I could not find any references to it." However, Ashcroft points out that it is essential to appreciate that superconductivity was discovered in 1911, and that the first accepted theory -- the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory -- did not appear until 1957.

"In the period between 1911 and 1957 the theoretical machinery needed to describe many-particle physics -- as opposed to thinking of electrons in metals as largely independent particles in a static lattice -- was under vigorous development," says Ashcroft. "Much of this was essential to the eventual theory and it simply post-dates Einstein's paper." However, Schmekel adds that Einstein raises some interesting points that were later found to be correct.

"I find it inconceivable that this paper is not well known," adds Ashcroft, who now includes a transparency of highlights from it when he gives talks on superconductivity. "Einstein was too important a figure, and superconductivity too important a phenomenon, for this to have been overlooked."