Skip to main content
Publishing

Publishing

What’s your Wu index?

05 Jun 2008 Michael Banks
Witten has the Wu factor

Ed Witten has once again been ranked as the world’s number one physicist, according to a new index that ranks scientists in terms of the citations generated from their published papers. The new measure, called the w-index, has been developed by Qiang Wu from the University of Science and Technology of China in Hefei.

Wu’s index is similar, but subtly different, to the h-index that was developed in 2005 by physicist Jorge Hirsch at the University of California at San Diego, which quantifies the published output of a scientist.

According to Hirsch’s criterion, a researcher with an h-index of, say, 9, indicates that he or she has published at least 9 papers, each of which has been cited 9 or more times. The w-index, on the other hand, indicates that a researcher has published w papers, with at least 10w citations each. A researcher who has a w-index of 24, for example, means he or she has 24 papers with at least 240 citations each.

Wu says in his paper that the index is a significant improvement on the h-index, as it “more accurately reflects the influence of a scientist’s top papers,” even though he concedes that the index could “be called the 10h-index” (arXiv:0805.4650v1).

Tops by both measures

Wu has calculated the w-index for some physicists who also have high h-indexes. Theortical physicist Ed Witten from the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, who has the highest h-index, also comes top in the w-index ranking with a score of 41. Witten is followed by condensed-matter theorist Phillip Anderson at Princeton University, with a w-index of 26, and cosmologist Stephen Hawking at Cambridge University coming third with a w-index of 24. Particle theorist Frank Wilczek (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) and Marvin Cohen (University of California, Berkeley) are joint fourth with a score of 23.

While Witten, Anderson and Wilczek also took three of the top five slots in the h-index ranking, the big winner under the new criterion is Hawking, who has a relatively modest h-index of just 62, compared to Witten’s score of 110.

According to Wu, a researcher with a w-index of 1 or 2 is someone who “has learned the rudiments of a subject”. A w-index of 3 or 4 characterizes a researcher who has mastered “the art of scientific activity”, while “outstanding individuals” are those with a w-index of 10. Wu reserves the accolade of “top scientists” to those with a w-index of 15 after 20 years or 20 after 30 years.

The w-index is easy to work out using a publication database such as ISI Web of Knowledge from Thomson Reuters, Scopus from Elsevier or Google Scholar. It can be determined in the same way as the h-index by simply searching for a researcher’s name in a database and then listing all their papers according to citations, with the highest first.

Copyright © 2024 by IOP Publishing Ltd and individual contributors