The Chinese particle physicist Chen-Ning Yang died on 18 October at the age of 103. Yang shared half of the 1957 Nobel Prize for Physics with Tsung-Dao Lee for their theoretical work that overturned the notion that parity is conserved in the weak force – one of the four fundamental forces of nature.
Born on 22 September 1922 in Hefei, China, Yang competed a BSc at the National Southwest Associated University in Kunming in 1942. After finishing an MSc in statistical physics at Tsinghua University two years later, in 1945 he moved to the University of Chicago in the US as part of a government-sponsored programme. He received his PhD in physics in 1948 working under the guidance of Edward Teller.
In 1949 Yang moved to the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, where he made pioneering contributions to quantum field theory, wotrking together with Robert Mills. In 1953 they proposed the Yang-Mills theory, which became a cornerstone of the Standard Model of particle physics.
The ‘Wu experiment’
It was also at Princeton where Yang began a fruitful collaboration with Lee, who died last year aged 97. Their work on parity – a property of elementary particles that expresses their behaviour upon reflection in a mirror – led to the duo winning the Nobel prize.
In the early 1950s, physicists had been puzzled by the decays of two subatomic particles, known as tau and theta, which are identical except that the tau decays into three pions with a net parity of -1, while a theta particle decays into two pions with a net parity of +1. Tsung-Dao Lee: Nobel laureate famed for work on parity violation dies aged 97
There were two possible explanations: either the tau and theta are different particles or that parity in the weak interaction is not conserved with Yang and Lee proposing various ways to test their ideas (Phys. Rev. 104 254).
This “parity violation” was later proved experimentally by, among others, Chien-Shiung Wu at Columbia University. She carried out an experiment based on the radioactive decay of unstable cobalt-60 nuclei into nickel-60 – what became known as the “Wu experiment”. For their work, Yang, who was 35 at the time, shared the 1957 Nobel Prize for Physics with Lee.
Influential physicist
In 1965 Yang moved to Stony Brook University, becoming the first director of the newly founded Institute for Theoretical Physics, which is now known as the C N Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics. During this time he also contributed to advancing science and education in China, setting up the Committee on Educational Exchange with China – a programme that has sponsored some 100 Chinese scholars to study in the US.
In 1997, Yang returned to Beijing where he became an honorary director of the Centre for Advanced Study at Tsinghua University. He then retired from Stony Brook in 1999, becoming a professor at Tsinghua University. During his time in the US, Yang obtained US citizenship, but renounced it in 2015. Credit where credit’s due?
More recently, Yang was involved in debates over whether China should build the Circular Electron Positron Collider (CEPC) – a huge 100 km circumference underground collider that would study the Higgs boson in unprecented detail and be a successor to CERN’s Large Hadron Collider. Yang took a sceptical view calling it “inappropriate” for a developing country that is still struggling with “more acute issues like economic development and environment protection”.
Yang also expressed concern that the science performed on the CEPC is just “guess” work and without guaranteed results. “I am not against the future of high-energy physics, but the timing is really bad for China to build such a super collider,” he noted in 2016. “Even if they see something with the machine, it’s not going to benefit the life of Chinese people any sooner.”
Lasting legacy
As well as the Nobel prize, Yang won many other awards such as the US National Medal of Science in 1986, the Einstein Medal in 1995, which is presented by the Albert Einstein Society in Bern, and the American Physical Society’s Lars Onsager Prize in 1990.
“The world has lost one of the most influential physicists of the modern era,” noted Stony Brook president Andrea Goldsmith in a statement. “His legacy will continue through his transformational impact on the field of physics and through the many colleagues and students influenced by his teaching, scholarship and mentorship.”
