Sixteenth-century Europe was a place of great change. Religious upheaval swept the continent, empires expanded and the mystic practices of the medieval world slowly began shifting toward modern science.

Copernicus’s heliocentric model of the universe, introduced in 1543, is often considered the origin of this so-called “Scientific Revolution”. However, with her latest book Inside the Stargazer’s Palace: the Transformation of Science in 16th-Century Northern Europe, historian and writer Violet Moller gives the story behind this transformation, putting lesser-known figures at the fore. She looks at the effect of religious and geopolitical events in northern Europe, starting from the late 15th century, and shows how the scholars of this period drew together strands of scientific thought that had been developing for decades.

Beginning in the German town of Nuremberg in 1471, the book is a sweeping tour of the continent, visiting the ancient university city of Louvain in what is now Belgium, the London suburb of Mortlake, Kassel in Germany and the formerly Danish island of Hven. She concludes this journey in Prague with the deposition of the Holy Roman Emperor and scientific patron Rudolf II in 1611, an event that broke apart Europe’s flourishing community of scientific minds.

As a scientist, I was disappointed to find the book fairly light on scientific detail. Inside the Stargazer’s Palace is first and foremost a history book, but I felt that some more scientific context would help most readers grasp the significance of the events Moller describes.

Read more

When Bose wrote to Einstein: the power of diverse thinking

Nonetheless, it was fascinating to see how politics and economics across the continent shaped scientific study. In the 15th century, the scientific community in northern Europe was exceedingly small, with scholarly knowledge restricted to those who could travel to the great knowledge centres in Italy, Greece and beyond. However, the development of the printing press in 1440 and the founding of the first scientific print house in Nuremberg changed the way information was shared forever. As scientific knowledge became more accessible, interest in understanding the natural world began to grow.

Through the closely connected tales of a number of individuals – from cartographer and instrument maker Gemma Frisius to the renowned alchemist Tycho Brahe – we see the beginnings of a scientific community. As Moller says, “Everyone, it seems, knew everyone,” with theories, techniques and instruments shared across a growing network of enthusiastic practitioners.

The development of the printing press mid-century and the founding of the first scientific print house in Nuremberg changed the way information was shared forever

This complexity did not come without its challenges. Moller introduces so many significant figures, each with their own niche, that by chapter four it’s difficult to keep track of who everyone is. The emphasis on personal stories also creates a slightly muddled narrative. In the introduction, Moller tells us “This narrative is based around places,” but at times the location seems incidental at best, if not entirely irrelevant. For example, chapter five ostensibly focuses on the Danish (now Swedish) island of Hven, home to Tycho Brahe. However, over the first 20 pages, we instead follow Brahe on his travels around Europe, and the description of his famous castle-come-laboratory Uraniborg at the end of the chapter feels rather compressed. Other locations, notably Kassel and Prague, are only relevant during the lifetime of a single enthusiastic patron, begging the question of whether it was the place or the person that really mattered.

Despite this sometimes rambling focus, Moller expertly guides the reader through the significant cultural and political events of the century. Beginning in the 1510s, the spread of Lutheranism across Europe brought with it an intellectual revolution, with its fiercest proponents encouraging followers to “think in innovative ways … and focus on praising God through studying his creation”. The conflict between the new Protestant denominations and the traditional Catholic faith drove the migration of great minds, who converged on the places most supportive of their scientific endeavours.

During this period, new observations also directly challenged long-held beliefs. In the early 16th century, astronomy and astrology were one and the same, and astrological predictions underpinned everything from medicine to political decisions. However, a series of astronomical phenomena towards the end of the century – the appearance of a new star in 1572 (later confirmed as a supernova), a comet in 1577, and the conjunction of Saturn and Jupiter in 1583 – triggered a shift away from divinatory thinking in the following decades. Measurements made from these observations conflicted with accepted theories about the universe, showing that the stars and planets were much further away than previously thought.

The discussion of these phenomena is a welcome one, introducing one of surprisingly few scientific details in the book. We are still left to guess many of the basic particulars of this scientific study: what was being measured and how, and why the results were significant. Moller instead provides a list of instruments – astrolabes, quadrants, sextants, torquetums and astronomy rings – with little or no explanation of what they are or how they work.

Moller is a historian, specializing in 16th-century England, so perhaps these subjects are beyond the scope of her expertise. However, a further frustration is the almost exclusive focus on astronomy; there is scant mention of other topics such as alchemy or botany, although this was promised by the book’s synopsis. Occasionally it also seems that Moller indulges her personal enthusiasm over the needs of the reader, placing an undue emphasis on inconsequential details and characters – John Dee, for example, continues to crop up long after his relevant contributions have passed.

The lack of scientific detail and loose focus made this a sometimes frustrating read. However, I can see that for non-scientists and those who prefer a more fluid approach, the book presents an intriguing alternative view of the Scientific Revolution. By the end of Inside the Stargazer’s Palace and, correspondingly, the 16th century, the stage has been set for the discoveries to come, but it feels like we’ve taken a circuitous route to get there.

• 2024 Oneworld 304pp £25.00hb