Skip to main content

Reset your password

Please enter the e-mail address you used to register to reset your password

Note: The verification e-mail to change your password should arrive immediately. However, in some cases it takes longer. Don't forget to check your spam folder.

If you haven't received the e-mail in 24 hours, please contact customerservices@ioppublishing.org

Registration complete

Thank you for registering with Physics World
If you'd like to change your details at any time, please visit My account

Close
Home » Page 130

China’s Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak smashes fusion confinement record

  • Update 20/02/2025: On 18 February, officials at France’s atomic energy commission (CEA) announced that its WEST Tokamak reactor, which is based in Cadarache, France, had maintained a steady-state high-confinement plasma for 1336 seconds.

A fusion tokamak in China has smashed its previous fusion record of maintaining a steady-state plasma. This week, scientists working on the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) announced that they had produced a steady-state high-confinement plasma for 1066 seconds, breaking EAST’s previous 2023 record of 403 seconds.

EAST is an experimental superconducting tokamak fusion device located in Hefei, China. Operated by the Institute of Plasma Physics (AISPP) at the Hefei Institute of Physical Science, it began operations in 2006. It is the first tokamak to contain a deuterium plasma using superconducting niobium-titanium toroidal and poloidal magnets.

EAST has recently undergone several upgrades, notably with new plasma diagnostic tools and a doubling in the power of the plasma heating system. EAST is also acting as a testbed for the ITER fusion reactor that is currently being built in Cadarache, France.

The EAST tokamak is able to maintain a plasma in the so-called “H‐mode”. This is the high-confinement regime that modern tokamaks, including ITER, employ. It occurs when the plasma undergoes intense heating by a neutral beam and results in a sudden improvement of plasma confinement by a factor of two.

In 2017 scientists at EAST broke the 100 seconds barrier for a steady-state H-mode plasma and then in 2023 achieved a 403 seconds, a world record at the time. On Monday, EAST officials announced that they had almost tipled that time, delivering H-mode operation for 1066 seconds.

ASIPP director Song Yuntao notes that the new record is “monumental” and represents a “critical step” toward realizing a functional fusion reactor. “A fusion device must achieve stable operation at high efficiency for thousands of seconds to enable the self-sustaining circulation of plasma,” he says, “which is essential for the continuous power generation of future fusion plants”.

New candidate emerges for a universal quantum electrical standard

Physicists in Germany have developed a new way of defining the standard unit of electrical resistance. The advantage of the new technique is that because it is based on the quantum anomalous Hall effect rather than the ordinary quantum Hall effect, it does not require the use of applied magnetic fields. While the method in its current form requires ultracold temperatures, an improved version could allow quantum-based voltage and resistance standards to be integrated into a single, universal quantum electrical reference.

Since 2019, all base units in the International System of Units (SI) have been defined with reference to fundamental constants of nature. For example, the definition of the kilogram, which was previously based on a physical artefact (the international prototype kilogram), is now tied to Planck’s constant, h.

These new definitions do come with certain challenges. For example, today’s gold-standard way to experimentally determine the value of h (as well the elementary charge e, another base SI constant) is to measure a quantized electrical resistance (the von Klitzing constant RK = h/e2) and a quantized voltage (the Josephson constant KJ = 2e/h). With RK and KJ pinned down, scientists can then calculate e and h.

To measure RK with high precision, physicists use the fact that it is related to the quantized values of the Hall resistance of a two-dimensional electron system (such as the ones that form in semiconductor heterostructures) in the presence of a strong magnetic field. This quantized change in resistance is known as the quantum Hall effect (QHE), and in semiconductors like GaAs or AlGaAs, it shows up at fields of around 10 Tesla. In graphene, a two-dimensional carbon sheet, fields of about 5 T are typically required.

The problem with this method is that KJ is measured by means of a separate phenomenon known as the AC Josephson effect, and the large external magnetic fields that are so essential to the QHE measurement render Josephson devices inoperable. According to Charles Gould of the Institute for Topological Insulators at the University of Würzburg (JMU), who led the latest research effort, this makes it difficult to integrate a QHE-based resistance standard with the voltage standard.

A way to measure RK at zero external magnetic field

Relying on the quantum anomalous Hall effect (QAHE) instead would solve this problem. This variant of the QHE arises from electron transport phenomena recently identified in a family of materials known as ferromagnetic topological insulators. Such quantum spin Hall systems, as they are also known, conduct electricity along their (quantized) edge channels or surfaces, but act as insulators in their bulk. In these materials, spontaneous magnetization means the QAHE manifests as a quantization of resistance even at weak (or indeed zero) magnetic fields.

In the new work, Gould and colleagues made Hall resistance quantization measurements in the QAHE regime on a device made from V-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3. These measurements showed that the relative deviation of the Hall resistance from RK at zero external magnetic field is just (4.4 ± 8.7) nΩ Ω−1. The method thus makes it possible to determine RK at zero magnetic field with the needed precision — something Gould says was not previously possible.

The snag is that the measurement only works under demanding experimental conditions: extremely low temperatures (below about 0.05 K) and low electrical currents (below 0.1 uA). “Ultimately, both these parameters will need to be significantly improved for any large-scale use,” Gould explains. “To compare, the QHE works at temperatures of 4.2 K and electrical currents of about 10 uA; making its detection much easier and cheaper to operate.”

Towards a universal electrical reference instrument

The new study, which is detailed in Nature Electronics, was made possible thanks to a collaboration between two teams, he adds. The first is at Würzburg, which has pioneered studies on electron transport in topological materials for some two decades. The second is at the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) in Braunschweig, which has been establishing QHE-based resistance standards for even longer. “Once the two teams became aware of each other’s work, the potential of a combined effort was obvious,” Gould says.

Because the project brings together two communities with very different working methods and procedures, they first had to find a window of operations where their work could co-exist. “As a simple example,” explains Gould, “the currents of ~100 nA used in the present study are considered extremely low for metrology, and extreme care was required to allow the measurement instrument to perform under such conditions. At the same time, this current is some 200 times larger than that typically used when studying topological properties of materials.”

As well as simplifying access to the constants h and e, Gould says the new work could lead to a universal electrical reference instrument based on the QAHE and the Josephson effect. Beyond that, it could even provide a quantum standard of voltage, resistance, and (by means of Ohm’s law) current, all in one compact experiment.

The possible applications of the QAHE in metrology have attracted a lot of attention from the European Union, he adds. “The result is a Europe-wide EURAMET metrology consortium QuAHMET aimed specifically at further exploiting the effect and operation of the new standard at more relaxed experimental conditions.”

Nanocrystals measure tiny forces on tiny length scales

Two independent teams in the US have demonstrated the potential of using the optical properties of nanocrystals to create remote sensors that measure tiny forces on tiny length scales. One team is based at Stanford University and used nanocrystals to measure the micronewton-scale forces exerted by a worm as it chewed bacteria. The other team is based at several institutes and used the photon avalanche effect in nanocrystals to measure sub-nanonewton to micronewton forces. The latter technique could potentially be used to study forces involved in processes such as stem cell differentiation.

Remote sensing of forces at small scales is challenging, especially inside living organisms. Optical tweezers cannot make remote measurements inside the body, while fluorophores – molecules that absorb and re-emit light – can measure forces in organisms, but have limited range, problematic stability or, in the case of quantum dots, toxicity. Nanocrystals with optical properties that change when subjected to external forces offer a way forward.

At Stanford, materials scientist Jennifer Dionne led a team that used nanocrystals doped with ytterbium and erbium. When two ytterbium atoms absorb near-infrared photons, they can then transfer energy to a nearby erbium atom. In this excited state, the erbium can either decay directly to its lowest energy state by emitting red light, or become excited to an even higher-energy state that decays by emitting green light. These processes are called upconversion.

Colour change

The ratio of green to red emission depends on the separation between the ytterbium and erbium atoms, and the separation between the erbium atoms – explains Dionne’s PhD student Jason Casar, who is lead author of a paper describing the Stanford research. Forces on the nanocrystal can change these separations and therefore affect that ratio.

The researchers encased their nanocrystals in polystyrene vessels approximately the size of a E coli bacterium. They then mixed the encased nanoparticles with E coli bacteria that were then fed to tiny nematode worms. To extract the nutrients, the worm’s pharynx needs to break open the bacterial cell wall. “The biological question we set out to answer is how much force is the bacterium generating to achieve that breakage?” explains Stanford’s Miriam Goodman.

The researchers shone near-infrared light on the worms, allowing them to monitor the flow of the nanocrystals. By measuring the colour of the emitted light when the particles reached the pharynx, they determined the force it exerted with micronewton-scale precision.

Meanwhile, a collaboration of scientists at Columbia University, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and elsewhere has shown that a process called photon avalanche can be used to measure even smaller forces on nanocrystals. The team’s avalanching nanoparticles (ANPs) are sodium yttrium fluoride nanocrystals doped with thulium – and were discovered by the team in 2021.

The fun starts here

The sensing process uses a laser tuned off-resonance from any transition from the ground state of the ANP. “We’re bathing our particles in 1064 nm light,” explains James Schuck of Columbia University, whose group led the research. “If the intensity is low, that all just blows by. But if, for some reason, you do eventually get some absorption – maybe a non-resonant absorption in which you give up a few phonons…then the fun starts. Our laser is resonant with an excited state transition, so you can absorb another photon.”

This creates a doubly excited state that can decay radiatively directly to the ground state, producing an upconverted photon. Or, it energy can be transferred to a nearby thulium atom, which becomes resonant with the excited state transition and can excite more thulium atoms into resonance with the laser. “That’s the avalanche,” says Schuck; “We find on average you get 30 or 40 of these events – it’s analogous to a chain reaction in nuclear fission.”

Now, Schuck and colleagues have shown that the exact number of photons produced in each avalanche decreases when the nanoparticle experiences compressive force. One reason is that the phonon frequencies are raised as the lattice is compressed, making non-radiatively decay energetically more favourable.

The thulium-doped nanoparticles decay by emitting either red or near infrared photons. As the force increases, the red dims more quickly, causing a change in the colour of the emitted light. These effects allowed the researchers to measure forces from the sub-nanonewton to the micronewton range – at which point the light output from the nanoparticles became too low to detect.

Not just for forces

Schuck and colleagues are now seeking practical applications of their discovery, and not just for measuring forces.

“We’re discovering that this avalanching process is sensitive to a lot of things,” says Schuck. “If we put these particles in a cell and we’re trying to measure a cellular force gradient, but the cell also happened to change its temperature, that would also affect the brightness of our particles, and we would like to be able to differentiate between those things. We think we know how to do that.”

If the technique could be made to work in a living cell, it could be used to measure tiny forces such as those involved in the extra-cellular matrix that dictate stem cell differentiation.

Andries Meijerink of Utrecht University in the Netherlands believes both teams have done important work that is impressive in different ways. Schuck and colleagues for unveiling a fundamentally new force sensing technique and Dionne’s team for demonstrating a remarkable practical application.

However, Meijerink is sceptical that photon avalanching will be useful for sensing in the short term. “It’s a very intricate process,” he says, adding, “There’s a really tricky balance between this first absorption step, which has to be slow and weak, and this resonant absorption”. Nevertheless, he says that researchers are discovering other systems that can avalanche. “I’m convinced that many more systems will be found,” he says.

Both studies are described in Nature. Dionne and colleagues report their results here, and Schuck and colleagues here.

IOP president Keith Burnett outlines a ‘pivotal’ year ahead for UK physics

Last year was the year of elections and 2025 is going to be the year of decisions.

After many countries, including the UK, Ireland and the US, went to the polls in 2024, the start of 2025 will see governments at the beginning of new terms, forced to respond swiftly to mounting economic, social, security, environmental and technological challenges.

These issues would be difficult to address at any given time, but today they come amid a turbulent geopolitical context. Governments are often judged against short milestones – the first 100 days or a first budget – but urgency should not come at the cost of thinking long-term, because the decisions over the next few months will shape outcomes for years, perhaps decades, to come. This is no less true for science than it is for health and social care, education or international relations.

In the UK, the first half of the year will be dominated by the government’s spending review. Due in late spring, it could be one of the toughest political tests for UK science, as the implications of the tight spending plans announced in the October budget become clear. Decisions about departmental spending will have important implications for physics funding, from research to infrastructure, facilities and teaching.

One of the UK government’s commitments is to establish 10-year funding cycles for key R&D activities – a policy that could be a positive improvement. Physics discoveries often take time to realise in full, but their transformational nature is indisputable. From fibre-optic communications to magnetic resonance imaging, physics has been indispensable to many of the world’s most impactful and successful innovations.

Emerging technologies, enabled by physicists’ breakthroughs in fields such as materials science and quantum physics, promise to transform the way we live and work, and create new business opportunities and open up new markets. A clear, comprehensive and long-term vision for R&D would instil confidence among researchers and innovators, and long-term and sustainable R&D funding would enable people and disruptive ideas to flourish and drive tomorrow’s breakthroughs.

Alongside the spending review, we are also expecting the publication of the government’s industrial strategy. The focus of the green paper published last year was an indication of how the strategy will place significance on science and technology in positioning the UK for economic growth.

If we don’t recognise the need to fund more physicists, we will miss so many of the opportunities that lie ahead

Physics-based industries are a foundation stone for the UK economy and are highly productive, as highlighted by research commissioned by the Institute of Physics, which publishes Physics World. Across the UK, the physics sector generates £229bn gross value added, or 11% of total UK gross domestic product. It creates a collective turnover of £643bn, or £1380bn when indirect and induced turnover is included.

Labour productivity in physics-based businesses is also strong at £84 300 per worker, per year. So, if physics is not at the heart of this effort, then the government’s mission of economic revival is in danger of failing to get off the launch pad.

A pivotal year

Another of the new government’s policy priorities is the strategic defence review, which is expected to be published later this year. It could have huge implications for physics given its core role in many of the technologies that contribute to the UK’s defence capabilities. The changing geopolitical landscape, and potential for strained relations between global powers, may well bring research security to the front of the national mind.

Intellectual property, and scientific innovation, are some of the UK’s greatest strengths and it is right to secure them. But physics discoveries in particular can be hampered by overzealous security measures. So much of the important work in our discipline comes from years of collaboration between researchers across the globe. Decisions about research security need to protect, not hamper, the future of UK physics research.

This year could also be pivotal for UK universities, as securing their financial stability and future will be one of the major challenges. Last year, the pressures faced by higher education institutions became apparent, with announcements of course closures, redundancies and restructures as a way of saving money. The rise in tuition fees has far from solved the problem, so we need to be prepared for more turbulence coming for the higher education sector.

These things matter enormously. We have heard that universities are facing a tough situation, and it’s getting harder for physics departments to exist. But if we don’t recognise the need to fund more physicists, we will miss so many of the opportunities that lie ahead.

As we celebrate the International Year of Quantum Science and Technology that marks the centenary of the initial development of quantum mechanics by Werner Heisenberg, 2025 is a reminder of how the benefits of physics span over decades.

We need to enhance all the vital and exciting developments that are happening in physics departments. The country wants and needs a stronger scientific workforce – just think about all those individuals who studied physics and now work in industries that are defending the country – and that workforce will be strongly dependent on physics skills. So our priority is to make sure that physics departments keep doing world-leading research and preparing the next generation of physicists that they do so well.

Why telling bigger stories is the only way to counter misinformation

If aliens came to Earth and tried to work out how we earthlings make sense of our world, they’d surely conclude that we take information and slot it into pre-existing stories – some true, some false, some bizarre. Ominously, these aliens would be correct. You don’t need to ask earthling philosophers, just look around.

Many politicians and influencers, for instance, are convinced that scientific evidence does not tell the reality about, for instance, autism or AIDS, the state of the atmosphere or the legitimacy of elections, or even about aliens. Truth comes to light only when you “know the full story”, which will eventually reveal the scientific data to be deceptive or irrelevant.

To see how this works in practice, suppose you hear someone say that a nearby lab is leaking x picocuries of a radioactive substance, potentially exposing you to y millirems of dose. How do you know if you’re in danger? Well, you’ll instinctively start going through a mental checklist of questions.

Who’s speaking – scientist, politician, reporter or activist? If it’s a scientist, are they from the government, a university, or an environmental or anti-nuclear group? You might then wonder: how trustworthy are the agencies that regulate the substance? Is the lab a good neighbour, or did it cover up past incidents? How much of the substance is truly harmful?

Your answers to all these questions will shape the story you tell yourself. You might conclude: “The lab is a responsible organization and will protect me”. Or perhaps you’ll think: “The lab is a thorn in the side of the community and is probably doing weapons-related work. The leak’s a sign of something far worse.”

Perhaps your story will be: “Those environmentalists are just trying to scare us and the data indicate the leak is harmless”. Or maybe it’ll be: “I knew it! The lab’s sold out, the data are terrifying, and the activists are revealing the real truth”. Such stories determine the meaning of the picocuries and millirems for humans, not the other way around.

Acquiring data

Humans gain a sense of what’s happening in several ways. Three of them, to use philosophical language, are deferential, civic and melodramatic epistemology.

In “deferential epistemology”, citizens habitually take the word of experts and institutions about things like the dangers of x picocuries and exposures of y millirems. In his 1624 book New Atlantis, the philosopher Francis Bacon famously crafted a fictional portrait of an island society where deferential epistemology rules and people instinctively trust the scientific infrastructure.

Earthlings haven’t seen deferential epistemology in a while

We may think this is how people ought to behave. But Bacon, who was also a politician, understood that deference to experts is not automatic and requires constantly curating the public face of the scientific infrastructure. Earthlings haven’t seen deferential epistemology in a while.

“Civic epistemology”, meanwhile, is how people acquire knowledge in the absence of that curation. Such people don’t necessarily reject experts but hear their voices alongside many others claiming to know best how to pursue our interests and values. Civic epistemology is when we negotiate daily life not by first consulting scientists but by pursuing our concerns with a mix of habit, trust, experience and friendly advice.

We sometimes don’t, in fact, take scientific advice when it collides with how we already behave; we may smoke or drink, for instance, despite warnings not to. Or we might seek guidance from non-scientists about things like the harms of radiation.

Finally, what I call “melodramatic epistemology” draws on the word “melodrama”, a genre of theatre involving extreme plots, obvious villains, emotional appeal, sensational language and moral outrage (the 1939 film Gone with the Wind comes to mind).

A melodramatic lens can be a powerful and irresistible way for humans to digest difficult and emotionally charged events

Melodramas were once considered culturally insignificant, but scholars such as Peter Brooks from Yale University have shown that a melodramatic lens can be a powerful and irresistible way for humans to digest difficult and emotionally charged events. The clarity, certainty and passion provided by a melodramatic read on a situation tends to displace the complexities, uncertainties and dispassion of scientific evaluation and evidence.

One example from physics occurred at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory in the late 1990s when activists fought, successfully, for the closing of its National Tritium Labeling Facility (NTLF). As I have written before, the NTLF had successfully developed techniques for medical studies while releasing tritium emissions well below federal and state environmental standards.

Activists, however, used melodramatic epistemology to paint the NTLF’s scientists as villains spreading breast cancer throughout the area, and denounced them as making “a terrorist attack on the citizens of Berkeley”. One activist called the scientists “piano players in a nuclear whorehouse.”

The critical point

The aliens studying us would worry most about melodramatic epistemology. Melodramatic epistemology, though dangerous, is nearly impervious to being altered, for any contrary data, studies and expert judgment are considered to spring from the villain’s allies and therefore to incite rather than allay fear.

Two US psychologists – William Brady from Northwestern University and Molly Crockett from Princeton University – recently published a study of how and why misinformation spreads (Science 386 991). By analysing data from Facebook and Twitter and by conducting real experiments with participants, they found that sources of misinformation evoke more outrage than trustworthy sources. Worse still, the outrage encourages us to share the misinformation even if we haven’t fully read the original source.

This makes it hard to counter misinformation. As the authors tactfully conclude: “Outrage-evoking misinformation may be difficult to mitigate with interventions that assume users want to share accurate information”.

The best, and perhaps only, way to challenge melodramatic stories is to write bigger, more encompassing stories that reveal that a different plot is unfolding

In my view, the best, and perhaps only, way to challenge melodramatic stories is to write bigger, more encompassing stories that reveal that a different plot is unfolding. Such a story about the NTLF, for instance, would comprise story lines about the benefits of medical techniques, the testing of byproducts, the origin of regulations of toxins, the perils of our natural environment, the nature of fear and its manipulation, and so forth. In such a big story, those who promote melodramatic epistemology show up as an obvious, and dangerous, subplot.

If the aliens see us telling such bigger stories, they might not give up earthlings for lost.

SMART spherical tokamak produces its first plasma

A novel fusion device based at the University of Seville in Spain has achieved its first plasma. The SMall Aspect Ratio Tokamak (SMART) is a spherical tokamak that can operate with a “negative triangularity” – the first spherical tokamak specifically designed to do so. Work performed on the machine could be useful when designing compact fusion power plants based on spherical tokamak technology.

SMART has been constructed by the University of Seville’s Plasma Science and Fusion Technology Laboratory. With a vessel dimension of 1.6 × 1.6 m, SMART has a 30 cm diameter solenoid wrapped around 12 toroidal field coils while eight poloidal field coils are used to shape the plasma.

Triangularity refers to the shape of the plasma relative to the tokamak. The cross section of the plasma in a tokamak is typically shaped like a “D”. When the straight part of the D faces the centre of the tokamak, it is said to have positive triangularity. When the curved part of the plasma faces the centre, however, the plasma has negative triangularity.

It is thought that negative triangularity configurations can better suppress plasma instabilities that expel particles and energy from the plasma, helping to prevent damage to the tokamak wall.

Last year, researchers at the University of Seville began to prepare the tokamak’s inner walls for a high pressure plasma by heating argon gas with microwaves. When those tests were successful, engineers then worked toward producing the first plasma.

“This is an important achievement for the entire team as we are now entering the operational phase,” notes SMART principal investigator Manuel García Muñoz. “The SMART approach is a potential game changer with attractive fusion performance and power handling for future compact fusion reactors. We have exciting times ahead.”

When charging quantum batteries, decoherence is a friend, not a foe

Devices like lasers and other semiconductor-based technologies operate on the principles of quantum mechanics, but they only scratch the surface. To fully exploit quantum phenomena, scientists are developing a new generation of quantum-based devices. These devices are advancing rapidly, fuelling what many call the “second quantum revolution”.

One exciting development in this domain is the rise of next-generation energy storage devices known as quantum batteries (QBs).  These devices leverage exotic quantum phenomena such as superposition, coherence, correlation and entanglement to store and release energy in ways that conventional batteries cannot. However, practical realization of QBs has its own challenges  such as reliance on fragile quantum states and difficulty in operating at room temperature.

A recent theoretical study by Rahul Shastri and colleagues from IIT Gandhinagar, India, in collaboration with researchers at China’s Zhejiang University and the China Academy of Engineering Physics takes significant strides towards understanding how QBs can be charged faster and more efficiently, thereby lowering some of the barriers restricting their use.

How does a QB work?

The difference between charging a QB and charging a mobile phone is that with a QB, both the battery and the charger are quantum systems. Shastri and colleagues focused on two such systems: a harmonic oscillator (HO) and a two-level system.  While a two-level system can exist in just two energy states, a harmonic oscillator has an evenly spaced range of energy levels. These systems therefore represent two extremes – one with a discrete, bounded energy range and the other with a more complex, unbounded energy spectrum approaching a continuous limit – making them ideal for exploring the versality of QBs.

In the quantum HO-based setup, a higher-energy HO acts as the charger and a lower-energy one as the battery. When the two are connected, or coupled, energy transfers from the charger to the battery. The two-level system follows the same working principle.  Such coupled quantum systems are routinely realized in experiments.

Using decoherence as a tool to improve QB performance

The study’s findings, which are published in npj Quantum Information, are both surprising and promising, illustrating how a phenomenon typically seen as a challenge in quantum systems – decoherence – can become a solution.

The term “decoherence” refers to the process where a quantum system loses its unique quantum properties (such as quantum correlation, coherence and entanglement). The key trigger for decoherence is quantum noise caused by interactions between a quantum system and its environment.

Since no real-world physical system is perfectly isolated, such noise is unavoidable, and even minute amounts of environmental noise can lead to decoherence. Maintaining quantum coherence is thus extremely challenging even in controlled laboratory settings, let alone industrial environments producing large-scale practical devices. For this reason, decoherence represents one of the most significant obstacles in advancing quantum technologies towards practical applications.

Shastri and colleagues, however discovered a way to turn this foe into a friend. “Instead of trying to eliminate these naturally occurring environmental effects, we ask: why not use them to our advantage?” Shashtri says.

The method they developed speeds up the charging process using a technique called controlled dephasing. Dephasing is a form of decoherence that usually involves the gradual loss of quantum coherence, but the researchers found that when managed carefully, it can actually boost the battery’s performance.

Dissipative effects, traditionally seen as a hindrance, can be harnessed to enhance performance

Rahul Shastri

To understand how this works, it’s important to note that at low levels of dephasing, the battery undergoes smooth energy oscillations. Too much dephasing, however, freezes these oscillations in what’s known as the quantum Zeno effect, essentially stalling the energy transfer. But with just the right amount of dephasing, the battery charges faster while maintaining stability. By precisely controlling the dephasing rate, therefore, it becomes possible to strike a balance that significantly improves charging speed while still preserving stability. This balance leads to quicker, more robust charging that could overcome challenges posed by environmental factors.

“Our study shows how dissipative effects, traditionally seen as a hindrance, can be harnessed to enhance performance,” Shastri notes. This opens the door to scalable, robust quantum battery designs, which could be extremely useful for energy management in quantum computing and other quantum-enabled applications.

Implications for scalable quantum technologies

The results of this study are encouraging for the quantum-technology industry. As per Shastri, using dephasing to optimize the charging speed and stability of QBs not only advances fundamental understanding but also addresses practical challenges in quantum energy storage.

“Our proposed method could be tested on existing platforms such as superconducting qubits and NMR systems, where dephasing control is already experimentally feasible,” he says. These platforms offer experimentalists a tangible starting point for verifying the study’s predictions and further refining QB performance.

Experimentalists testing this theory will face challenges. Examples include managing additional decoherence mechanisms like amplitude damping and achieving the ideal balance of controlled dephasing in realistic setups. However, Shastri says that these challenges present valuable opportunities to refine and expand the proposed theoretical model for optimizing QB performance under practical conditions. The second quantum revolution is already underway, and QBs might just be the power source that charges our quantum future.

Microbeams plus radiosensitizers could optimize brain cancer treatment

Brain tumours are notoriously difficult to treat, resisting conventional treatments such as radiation therapy, where the deliverable dose is limited by normal tissue tolerance. To better protect healthy tissues, researchers are turning to microbeam radiation therapy (MRT), which uses spatially fractionated beams to spare normal tissue while effectively killing cancer cells.

MRT is delivered using arrays of ultrahigh-dose rate synchrotron X-ray beams tens of microns wide (high-dose peaks) and spaced hundreds of microns apart (low-dose valleys). A research team from the Centre for Medical Radiation Physics at the University of Wollongong in Australia has now demonstrated that combining MRT with targeted radiosensitizers – such as nanoparticles or anti-cancer drugs – can further boost treatment efficacy, reporting their findings in Cancers.

“MRT is famous for its healthy tissue-sparing capabilities with good tumour control, whilst radiosensitizers are known for their ability to deliver targeted dose enhancement to cancer,” explains first author Michael Valceski. “Combining these modalities just made sense, with their synergy providing the potential for the best of both worlds.”

Enhancement effects

Valceski and colleagues combined MRT with thulium oxide nanoparticles, the chemotherapy drug methotrexate and the radiosensitizer iododeoxyuridine (IUdR). They examined the response of monolayers of rodent brain cancer cells to various therapy combinations. They also compared conventional broadbeam orthovoltage X-ray irradiation with synchrotron broadbeam X-rays and synchrotron MRT.

Synchrotron irradiations were performed on the Imaging and Medical Beamline at the ANSTO Australian Synchrotron, using ultrahigh dose rates of 74.1 Gy/s for broadbeam irradiation and 50.3 Gy/s for MRT. The peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR, used to characterize an MRT field) of this set-up was measured as 8.9.

Using a clonogenic assay to measure cell survival, the team observed that synchrotron-based irradiation enhanced cell killing compared with conventional irradiation at the same 5 Gy dose (for MRT this is the valley dose, the peaks experience 8.9 times higher dose), demonstrating the increased cell-killing effect of these ultrahigh-dose rate X-rays.

Adding radiosensitizers further increased the impact of synchrotron broadbeam irradiation, with DNA-localized IUdR killing more cells than cytoplasm-localized nanoparticles. Methotrexate, meanwhile, halved cell survival compared with conventional irradiation.

The team observed that at 5 Gy, MRT showed equivalent cell killing to synchrotron broadbeam irradiation. Valceski explains that this demonstrates MRT’s tissue-sparing potential, by showing how MRT can maintain treatment efficacy while simultaneously protecting healthy cells.

MRT also showed enhanced cell killing when combined with radiosensitizers, with the greatest effect seen for IUdR and IUdR plus methotrexate. This local dose enhancement, attributed to the DNA localization of IUdR, could further improve the tissue-sparing capabilities of MRT by enabling a lower per-fraction dose to reduce patient exposure whilst maintaining tumour control.

Imaging valleys and peaks

To link the biological effects with the physical collimation of MRT, the researchers performed confocal microscopy (at the Fluorescence Analysis Facility in Molecular Horizons, University of Wollongong) to investigate DNA damage following treatment at 0.5 and 5 Gy. Twenty minutes after irradiation, they imaged fixed cells to visualize double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs), as shown by γH2AX foci (representing a nuclear DSB site).

Spatially fractionated beams
Spatially fractionated beams Imaging DNA damage following MRT confirms that the cells’ biological responses match the beam collimation. The images show double-strand DNA breaks (green) overlaid on a nuclear counterstain (blue). (Courtesy: CC BY/Cancers 10.3390/cancers16244231)

The images verified that the cells’ biological responses corresponded with the MRT beam patterns, with the 400 µm microbeam spacing clearly seen in all treated cells, both with and without radiosensitizers.

In the 0.5 Gy images, the microbeam tracks were consistent in width, while the 5 Gy MRT tracks were wider as DNA damage spread from peaks into the valleys. This radiation roll-off was also seen with IUdR and IUdR plus methotrexate, with numerous bright foci visible in the valleys, demonstrating dose enhancement and improved cancer-killing with these radiosensitizers.

The researchers also analysed the MRT beam profiles using the γH2AX foci intensity across the images. Cells treated with radiosensitizers had broadened peaks, with the largest effect seen with the nanoparticles. As nanoparticles can be designed to target tumours, this broadening (roughly 30%) can be used to increase the radiation dose to cancer cells in nearby valleys.

“Peak broadening adds a novel benefit to radiosensitizer-enhanced MRT. The widening of the peaks in the presence of nanoparticles could potentially ‘engulf’ the entire cancer, and only the cancer, whilst normal tissues without nanoparticles retain the protection of MRT tissue sparing,” Valceski explains. “This opens up the potential for MRT radiosurgery, something our research team has previously investigated.”

Finally, the researchers used γH2AX foci data for each peak and valley to determine a biological PVDR. The biological PDVR values matched the physical PVDR of 8.9, confirming for the first time a direct relationship between physical dose delivered and DSBs induced in the cancer cells. They note that adding radiosensitizers generally lowered the biological PVDRs from the physical value, likely due to additional DSBs induced in the valleys.

The next step will be to perform preclinical studies of MRT. “Trials to assess the efficacy of this multimodal therapy in treating aggressive cancers in vivo are key, especially given the theragnostic potential of nanoparticles for image-guided treatment and precision planning, as well as cancer-specific dose enhancement,” senior author Moeava Tehei tells Physics World. “Considering the radiosurgical potential of stereotactic, radiosensitizer-enhanced MRT fractions, we can foresee a revolutionary multimodal technique with curative potential in the near future.”

Wrinkles in space–time could remember the secrets of exploding stars

Permanent distortions in space–time caused by the passage of gravitational waves could be detectable from Earth. Known as “gravitational memory”, such distortions are predicted to occur most prominently when the core of a supernova collapses. Observing them could therefore provide a window into the death of massive stars and the creation of black holes, but there’s a catch: the supernova might have to happen in our own galaxy.

Physicists have been detecting gravitational waves from colliding stellar-mass black holes and neutron stars for almost a decade now, and theory predicts that core-collapse supernovae should also produce them. The difference is that unlike collisions, supernovae tend to be lopsided – they don’t explode outwards equally in all directions. It is this asymmetry – in both the emission of neutrinos from the collapsing core and the motion of the blast wave itself – that produces the gravitational-wave memory effect.

“The memory is the result of the lowest frequency aspects of these motions,” explains Colter Richardson, a PhD student at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville, US and co-lead author (with Haakon Andresen of Sweden’s Oskar Klein Centre) of a Physical Review Letters paper describing how gravitational-wave memory detection might work on Earth.

Filtering out seismic noise

Previously, many physicists assumed it wouldn’t be possible to detect the memory effect from Earth. This is because it manifests at frequencies below 10 Hz, where noise from seismic events tends to swamp detectors. Indeed, Harvard astrophysicist Kiranjyot Gill argues that detecting gravitational memory “would require exceptional sensitivity in the millihertz range to separate it from background noise and other astrophysical signals” – a sensitivity that she says Earth-based detectors simply don’t have.

Anthony Mezzacappa, Richardson’s supervisor at Tennessee, counters this by saying that while the memory signal itself cannot be detected, the ramp-up to it can. “The signal ramp-up corresponds to a frequency of 20–30 Hz, which is well above 10 Hz, below which the detector response needs to be better characterized for what we can detect on Earth, before dropping down to virtually 0 Hz where the final memory amplitude is achieved,” he tells Physics World.

The key, Mezzacappa explains, is a “matched filter” technique in which templates of what the ramp-up should look like are matched to the signal to pick it out from low-frequency background noise. Using this technique, the team’s simulations show that it should be possible for Earth-based gravitational-wave detectors such as LIGO to detect the ramp-up even though the actual deformation effect would be tiny – around 10-16 cm “scaled to the size of a LIGO detector arm”, Richardson says.

The snag is that for the ramp-up to be detectable, the simulations suggest the supernova would need to be close – probably within 10 kiloparsecs (32,615 light-years) of Earth. That would place it within our own galaxy, and galactic supernovae are not exactly common. The last to be observed in real time was spotted by Johannes Kepler in 1604; though there have been others since, we’ve only identified their remnants after the fact.

Going to the Moon

Mezzacappa and colleagues are optimistic that multimessenger astronomy techniques such as gravitational-wave and neutrino detectors will help astronomers identify future Milky Way supernovae as they happen, even if cosmic dust (for example) hides their light for optical observers.

Gill, however, prefers to look towards the future. In a paper under revision at Astrophysical Journal Letters, and currently available as a preprint, she cites two proposals for detectors on the Moon that could transform gravitational-wave physics and extend the range at which gravitational memory signals can be detected.

The first, called the Lunar Gravitational Wave Antenna, would use inertial sensors to detect the Moon shaking as gravitational waves ripple through it. The other, known as the Laser Interferometer Lunar Antenna, would be like a giant, triangular version of LIGO with arms spanning tens of kilometres open to space. Both are distinct from the European Space Agency’s Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, which is due for launch in the 2030s, but is optimized to detect gravitational waves from supermassive black holes rather than supernovae.

“Lunar-based detectors or future space-based observatories beyond LISA would overcome the terrestrial limitations,” Gill argues. Such detectors, she adds, could register a memory effect from supernovae tens or even hundreds of millions of light-years away. This huge volume of space would encompass many galaxies, making the detection of gravitational waves from core-collapse supernovae almost routine.

The memory of something far away

In response, Richardson points out that his team’s filtering method could also work at longer ranges – up to approximately 10 million light-years, encompassing our own Local Group of galaxies and several others – in certain circumstances. If a massive star is spinning very quickly, or it has an exceptionally strong magnetic field, its eventual supernova explosion will be highly collimated and almost jet-like, boosting the amplitude of the memory effect. “If the amplitude is significantly larger, then the detection distance is also significantly larger,” he says.

Whatever technologies are involved, both groups agree that detecting gravitational-wave memory is important. It might, for example, tell us whether a supernova has left behind a neutron star or a black hole, which would be valuable because the reasons one forms and not the other remain a source of debate among astrophysicists.

“By complementing other multimessenger observations in the electromagnetic spectrum and neutrinos, gravitational-wave memory detection would provide unparalleled insights into the complex interplay of forces in core-collapse supernovae,” Gill says.

Richardson agrees that a detection would be huge and hopes that his work and that of others “motivates new investigations into the low-frequency region of gravitational-wave astronomy”.

‘Why do we have to learn this?’ A physics educator’s response to every teacher’s least favourite question

Several years ago I was sitting at the back of a classroom supporting a newly qualified science teacher. The lesson was going well, a pretty standard class on Hooke’s law, when a student leaned over to me and asked “Why are we doing this? What’s the point?”.

Having taught myself, this was a question I had been asked many times before. I suspect that when I was a teacher, I went for the knee-jerk “it’s useful if you want to be an engineer” response, or something similar. This isn’t a very satisfying answer, but I never really had the time to formulate a real justification for studying Hooke’s law, or physics in general for that matter.

Who is the physics curriculum designed for? Should it be designed for the small number of students who will pursue the subject, or subjects allied to it, at the post-16 and post-18 level? Or should we be reflecting on the needs of the overwhelming majority who will never use most of the curriculum content again? Only about 10% of students pursue physics or physics-rich subjects post-16 in England, and at degree level, only around 4000 students graduate with physics degrees in the UK each year.

One argument often levelled at me is that learning this is “useful”, to which I retort – in a similar vein to the student from the first paragraph – “In what way?” In the 40 years or so since first learning Hooke’s law, I can’t remember ever explicitly using it in my everyday life, despite being a physicist. Whenever I give a talk on this subject, someone often pipes up with a tenuous example, but I suspect they are in the minority. An audience member once said they consider the elastic behaviour of wire when hanging pictures, but I suspect that many thousands of pictures have been successfully hung with no recourse to F = –kx.

Hooke’s law is incredibly important in engineering but, again, most students will not become engineers or rely on a knowledge of the properties of springs, unless they get themselves a job in a mattress factory.

From a personal perspective, Hooke’s law fascinates me. I find it remarkable that we can see the macroscopic properties of materials being governed by microscopic interactions and that this can be expressed in a simple linear form. There is no utilitarianism in this, simply awe, wonder and aesthetics. I would always share this “joy of physics” with my students, and it was incredibly rewarding when this was reciprocated. But for many, if not most, my personal perspective was largely irrelevant, and they knew that the curriculum content would not directly support them in their future careers.

At this point, I should declare my position – I don’t think we should take Hooke’s law, or physics, off the curriculum, but my reason is not the one often given to students.

A series of lessons on Hooke’s law is likely to include: experimental design; setting up and using equipment; collecting numerical data using a range of devices; recording and presenting data, including graphs; interpreting data; modelling data and testing theories; devising evidence-based explanations; communicating ideas; evaluating procedures; critically appraising data; collaborating with others; and working safely.

Science education must be about preparing young people to be active and critical members of a democracy, equipped with the skills and confidence to engage with complex arguments that will shape their lives. For most students, this is the most valuable lesson they will take away from Hooke’s law. We should encourage students to find our subject fascinating and relevant, and in doing so make them receptive to the acquisition of scientific knowledge throughout their lives.

At a time when pressures on the education system are greater than ever, we must be able to articulate and justify our position within a crowded curriculum. I don’t believe that students should simply accept that they should learn something because it is on a specification. But they do deserve a coherent reason that relates to their lives and their careers. As science educators, we owe it to our students to have an authentic justification for what we are asking them to do. As physicists, even those who don’t have to field tricky questions from bored teenagers, I think it’s worthwhile for all of us to ask ourselves how we would answer the question “What is the point of this?”.

Copyright © 2026 by IOP Publishing Ltd and individual contributors