Skip to main content

Sci Fi meets science at the LHC

torchwood.jpg
Ready for action at the LHC (Courtesy: BBC).

By Hamish Johnston

Clearly the world didn’t end earlier today when the first protons made their way around the LHC.

But what if something unexpected had happened…what if physicists (including our own Jon Cartwright) started vanishing and what if something was lurking in the accelerator tunnel…who would we turn to?

Torchwood’s Captain Jack, of course, who will be leaping from the tallest toroids later today in a special radio edition of the Dr Who spin-off set at the LHC.

You can listen to Torchwood: Lost Souls on BBC Radio 4 today at 14.15 BST and for the next seven days as a podcast.

And for more LHC fun, check out this story in The Sun: Boffins in ‘Doomsday’ rap

LHC milestone day gets off to fast start

The official “start up” day of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has begun, with a low-energy beam of protons making it all the way round the 27 km-long ring.

At 9:30 a.m. CET (8:30 a.m. BST), control-centre scientists Stefano Radaelli and Rassano Giachino — given the go-ahead from project leader Lyn Evans — injected a proton beam with an energy of 450 GeV from the Super Proton Synchrotron into the LHC.

The beam travelled through one of the eight sectors and past the ATLAS experiment before being stopped by a purposefully inserted screen. At that moment the screen generated a flash — and an applause from all those in the control room.

After just a few minutes the operations team decided to remove the screen and take the beam through another sector. That, too, was successful.

At 9:44 a.m. CET the team removed the screen preventing access to the third and fourth sector, and tried to get the beam to the halfway point where the CMS experiment is located. The first attempt failed, but the second produced the tell-tale flash, and even CMS saw some particle tracks.

Clearly on a lucky streak, Evans gave the order to allow the proton beam past the halfway point into sector four, where the “beam dump” point is located. At 9:54 a.m. CET, the operations team cheered as their plasma monitors revealed the beam’s successful progress. However, Evans decided — in French — that the beam was not “beautiful” enough and needed it to be “more corrected”.

“At this rate, we hope,” he said, “we should get a beam all the way around the LHC within an hour.” Minutes later at 10:06 a.m. CET another ovation marked the successful passage of the proton beam through the 700 m-long beam-dump tube.

By 10:13 a.m. CET the beam had made it round to the seventh sector past the LHCb experiment. Then, at 10:17 a.m., it reached ATLAS, the biggest of the four experiments at the LHC.

After several moments of tense silence, the home run came at 10:24 a.m. and 30 s to a huge applause.

Robert Aymar, the director general of CERN, said he was “too happy to be on TV”.

The injection marks the beginning of a milestone day for CERN, the European lab hosting the €6.3 bn accelerator. Hundreds of journalists have packed into the lab’s science and innovation “globe” to report on the day’s events, while at least three international satellites are relaying a live video and data stream to institutions worldwide.

LHC switch-on: a preview

control room.jpg
The LHC control room (heavy lever obscured from view).

By Jon Cartwright

Until a few months back I had an excited vision of the moment the great LHC “switch on” would take place. Here’s how it goes: The control room, normally frantic with the workings of scientists, falls under tense silence as a lone technician grips a heavy lever. Just as the quiet becomes unbearable, the director general mutters: “OK, let’s go.” Beads of sweat trickling down his temples, the technician heaves back the lever while averting nervously to a dial that has coloured bars going from green to yellow to red (450 GeV…5 TeV…7 TeV…DANGER) . “Faster!” cries the director general, his eyes glowing with a sort of manic intensity, “Faster!” Then the control room begins to shake and the scientists dive under their workstations to avoid the plaster and tiles falling from the ceiling.

Needless to say, the real event tomorrow will not satisfy onlookers with any cinematic clichés (and nor will the beams break any speed records — they will be strictly cruising at their injection energy of 450 GeV). But that’s not to say the event will be without drama, as I found out today when I went to CERN’s Meyrin site for for lunch with Paul Collier, head of the accelerator operations team.

“It’s not like blasting off from Cape Canaveral,” he said, referring to the fact that there is no definite countdown for performing certain tasks. Rather, the operations team will be learning as it goes, and we will get to watch — milestones, mistakes and all. The current plan is to inject the first beam into the ring at around 9:30 am, but it could happen anytime between 9 and 10 am (keep an eye out on this blog for the decisive moment). From then on, the team will take the beam round the LHC’s 27 km-long ring in a dozen or so sections, each initially fenced-off by a physical barrier.

(more…)

Bar brief power failure, LHC ready for start up

By Jon Cartwright

In my last blog entry on the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) I asked if CERN could make it to Wednesday without any further difficulties. Well, there’s been one — a thunderstorm-induced power cut that took out the cryogenic systems for the weekend — but other than that it’s all systems go for the eagerly awaited “start up”.

On Friday evening, according to CERN spokesperson James Gillies, the LHC operations team successfully performed a third and final synchronization test. Unlike the previous two tests, which concerned “kicking” proton beams from the Super Proton Synchrotron into the LHC’s ring, the aim on Friday was to make sure the protons could be booted out of the ring at the “beam dump” point located between sectors five and six. The latest test also demonstrated that the team could navigate the protons around two sectors, or about 7 km. That means they’ve already reached 25% of their target for Wednesday, when they plan to get a low-energy beam cruising around the 27 km ring in one direction.

Talking about Wednesday, physicsworld.com is now reporting from CERN to bring you all the news in the run-up to the big day. You can also expect an analysis of the events in the October issue of Physics World.

LHC fever hits the UK

By Hamish Johnston

You would have to be living under a rock in the UK not to know that the Large Hadron Collider will be fired up next week at CERN in Geneva. BBC Radio 4 is dedicating an entire day of programming to the LHC (called ‘Big Bang Day’, and this is being promoted with great fervour across the corporation’s many TV and radio outlets.

This morning Chris Llewellyn Smith,former director general of CERN, was on Radio 4’s Today Programme to reassure listeners that the world will not be destroyed by a black hole — or turn into a “strange goo” — when the LHC is switched on.

Meanwhile over on Radio 5 Live, CERN physicist John Ellis was chatting about his new paper  ‘Review of the safety of LHC collisions’ with host Nicky Campbell. This is surely the first time that an article in the Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics has been deemed to have the same news value as the latest exploits of Newcastle United’s ex-manager Kevin Keegan.

Indeed, one could be forgiven for thinking that the LHC is ‘brought to you by the BBC’. In today’s Times, gossip columnist Adam Sherwin suggested that the LHC start-up date was pushed back to 10 September because BBC superstar Andrew Marr — who will be presenting live from CERN on the day — is on holiday this week. The BBC has denied exerting undue control over the world’s largest physics experiment.

Another ‘quality daily’, The Independent, ran the headline ‘It’s sex and drugs and particle physics as D:Ream star recreates the Big Bang’ earlier this week. For those too young to remember, the article refers to Brian Cox, who is sort of a Liam Gallagher of particle physics and one of the many stars that the BBC will be rolling out next week.

And leave it to The Sun to say: ‘End of the world due in nine days’ …unless Andrew Marr decides to extend his holiday, of course.

Cloud-seeding ships could combat climate change

It should be possible to counteract the global warming associated with a doubling of carbon dioxide levels by enhancing the reflectivity of low-lying clouds above the oceans, according to researchers in the US and UK. John Latham of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, US, and colleagues say that this can be done using a worldwide fleet of autonomous ships spraying salt water into the air.

Clouds are a key component of the Earth’s climate system. They can both heat the planet by trapping the longer-wavelength radiation given off from the Earth’s surface and cool it by reflecting incoming shorter wavelength radiation back into space. The greater weight of the second mechanism means that, on balance, clouds have a cooling effect.

’Twomey effect’ boosts reflectivity

Latham’s proposal, previously put forward by himself and a number of other scientists, involves increasing the reflectivity, or “albedo”, of clouds lying about 1 km above the ocean’s surface. The idea relies on the “Twomey effect”, which says that increasing the concentration of water droplets within a cloud raises the overall surface area of the droplets and thereby enhances the cloud’s albedo. By spraying fine droplets of sea water into the air, the small particles of salt within each droplet act as new centres of condensation when they reach the clouds above, leading to a greater concentration of water droplets within each cloud.

Latham and co-workers, including wave-energy researcher Stephen Salter of Edinburgh University, claim that such spraying could increase the rate at which clouds reflect solar energy back into space by as much as 3.7 Wm-2. This is the extra power per unit area that scientists say will arrive at the Earth’s surface following a doubling of the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide compared to pre-industrial levels — 550 ppm vs 275 ppm (Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A DOI:10.1098/rsta.2008.0137).

New spin on sailing

The 300-tonne unmanned ships used to seed the clouds would be powered by the wind, but would not use conventional sails. Instead they would be fitted with a number of 20 m-high, 2.5 m-diameter cylinders known as “Flettner rotors” that would be made to spin continuously. This spinning would generate a force perpendicular to the wind direction, propelling the ship forward if it is oriented at right angles to the wind (Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0136).

These rotors would be easier to operate remotely than sails and would also serve as the conduits for the upward spray, with the spray consisting of droplets 0.8 µm in diameter generated by passing sea water through micro nozzles. The power for the spray and the cylinder rotation would be provided by oversized propellers operating as turbines.

The immediate effect of seeding clouds in this way would be a local cooling of the sea surface, and as such the technique could be targeted at coral reefs, diminishing polar ice sheets or other vulnerable regions. However, the great thermal heat capacity of the ocean and the currents within it mean that these initial effects would eventually spread across the globe.

Fleet of 1500

Latham and colleagues calculate that, depending on exactly what fraction of low-level maritime clouds are targeted (with some regions, notably the sea off the west coasts of Africa and North and South America, more susceptible to this technique than others), around 1500 ships would be needed altogether to counteract a carbon doubling, at a cost of some £1m to £2m each. This would involve an initial fleet expanding by some 50 ships a year if the scheme is to keep in step with the current rate of increase in atmospheric carbon-dioxide levels.

This cloud-seeding proposal is one of a number of ideas put forward by scientists in recent years to “geoengineer” the Earth in response to climate change rather than, or as well as, deal with the causes of the change. A series of papers on several proposals, including Latham’s, have been published in a recent issue of the journal Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A entitled Geoscale engineering to avert dangerous climate change.

Latham maintains that his group’s idea is not pie in the sky and that its feasibility is supported by two of the world’s leading computer climate models, as well as recently obtained experimental cloud data. He points out that, unlike rival techniques, the system could be used to vary the degree of cooling as required and could be switched off instantaneously if needed. However, he adds more research must be done to find out a number of unknowns — such as exactly what fraction of spray droplets will reach the clouds — and to establish that the technique would not create any harmful climatic side effects. More work must also be done on the spray technology, he says.

Should cameras be banned at conference presentations?

By Jon Cartwright

Physicists used to be able to show preliminary results at conference presentations, safe in the knowledge that no-one would steal their data. Now, with the advent of the “physics paparazzi”, things have changed.

It started a few weeks back when, at a high-energy physics conference in Philadelphia, a member of the PAMELA team flashed a slide that depicted an excess of high-energy positrons in the ionosphere. Although several conference attendees suggested the positron excess could be evidence for dark matter — the elusive substance thought to make up some five-sixths of all matter in the universe — the team did not make the slide available to journalists or other scientists.

That, however, didn’t stop Marco Cirelli of CNRS in France and Alessandro Strumia of INFN in Italy. Those attendees managed to take a snapshot of the slide during its momentary disclosure and use the picture as the basis for an analysis which they published on the arXiv preprint server.

(more…)

Shedding light on artificial atoms

Spectroscopy has come a long way since the early 19th century when the German physicist Josef Fraunhofer first saw dark lines in the spectrum of light coming from the Sun, which give clues to its chemical composition.

The technique is now commonplace in research labs and usually involves shining a beam of light on a sample and watching how it absorbs light as the frequency of the radiation is swept through a range of values. An atom, for example, absorbs radiation at a specific set of frequencies that correspond to gaps between the energy levels of its electrons.

Physicists in the US have now turned the idea of atomic spectroscopy on its head by inventing a new technique that works by shining radiation of a fixed frequency on a sample, while sweeping the amplitude of the radiation up and down.

They say the new method works particularly well on tiny pieces of solid material called “artificial atoms” and that it could someday help researchers build and control quantum computers based on such devices (Nature 455 51).

Tricky microwaves

One problem with conventional spectroscopy is that it can be tricky to carry out with microwaves and millimetre waves (at frequencies of 10–300 GHz). Put simply, it is hard to disentangle the true spectrum of a sample from unrelated frequency-dependent effects in the spectrometer.

This has been bad news for researchers studying artificial atoms, which exhibit properties of ordinary atoms, including discrete energy levels. Such atoms could potentially be used to store and process data. The snag in using artificial atoms as putative quantum-information systems is that the gaps between the levels tend to be in the tricky millimetre and microwave region.

The new technique — devised by William Oliver and colleagues at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the US — shows great promise for studying, and possibly even controlling, artificial atoms. The team’s artificial atom is a “superconducting qubit”, which is a tiny loop of niobium about 16 µm across that is cooled to about 20 mK. A superconducting current flows around the loop and its energy levels are quantized much like the energy levels of electrons orbiting an atomic nucleus.

Shifting energy levels

The team exposed their qubit to 0.16 GHz radio waves and swept the amplitude of the radiation. As the amplitude increases, the energy levels (or quantum states) of the artificial atom are shifted in energy. This was detected by measuring tiny changes in the superconducting current – or more precisely changes in the magnetic flux through the loop.

Some states are shifted up in energy and some down – and eventually two states can meet. But instead of crossing each other, quantum mechanics requires that an energy gap occurs where the two states intersect. At this point, the qubit can remain in that state, or jump to the other state.

However, in the weird world of quantum mechanics, the qubit is actually in a superposition of both states at the same time. So if the amplitude of the applied radiation is swept up and down in the region of a crossing, the superposition state “collides” with itself, causing an array of interference patterns to appear in a plot of flux versus amplitude.

These interference patterns are contained within a series of “diamonds”. According to Oliver, the energy levels of the artificial atom can be deduced from the position of the diamond vertices along with information extracted from the interference patterns.

A rougher sort of quantum control

Oliver told physicsworld.com that amplitude spectroscopy could lead to new ways of controlling qubits. Today, most quantum-control schemes are adiabatic, using small-amplitude pulses to gently nudge a qubit from one state to another without destroying its quantum nature. However, the MIT researchers found that a brief but large-amplitude pulse at a fixed frequency could be used to switch their qubit, suggesting that quantum control could be achieved using “non-adiabatic” schemes.

The team are now looking into such “non-adiabatic” methods of quantum control.

How fast could Usain Bolt have run the 100-metre dash?

By Hamish Johnston

On 16 August Usain Bolt sprinted to gold in the 100 m dash at the Beijing Olympics, setting a new world record of 9.69 s.

But could he have gone faster? Many people think so because after the first 80 m of the race, when it was clear that he would win, the Jamaican appeared to stop trying and begun celebrating.

Now, four physicists in Norway have analysed video of the race and concluded that he could have covered the 100 m in as little as 9.55 s (plus or minus 0.04 s) if he had maintained his pre-celebration acceleration.

In a second calculation, the physicists argue that if Bolt had started to flag in the final 20 m — but still matched the acceleration of runner-up Richard Thompson — Bolt still would have finished in 9.61 s (plus or minus 0.04 s).

Cynics have suggested that Bolt held back so he would have a better chance at cracking the world record again, but the world’s fastest man remains silent on exactly why he appears to have stopped trying.

Graphene pioneers bag Europhysics prize

Andre Geim and Kostya Novoselov of the University of Manchester in the UK have been awarded this year’s Europhysics Prize for “discovering and isolating a single free-standing atomic layer of carbon (graphene) and elucidating its remarkable electronic properties”. The annual award is given by the European Physical Society’s condensed-matter division and the pair will share €10,000 in prize money.

The two researchers discovered graphene in 2004 by using a piece of adhesive tape to peel a single atomic layer off a piece of graphite — a process known as micromechanical cleavage or the “Scotch tape method”.

The pair then worked out how to make field-effect transistors using the material and discovered that electrons in the device were able to travel ballistically — that is, without being scattered — from the source to the drain electrode at room temperature.

As famous as silicon

In ten years time I believe the word graphene will be as widely known to the public as silicon Andre Geim, University of Manchester

In principle, ballistic transistors could operate much faster than conventional devices made of silicon and this discover led to a flurry of research into the electronic properties of graphene that shows no signs of abating.

Accepting the award in Rome last week, Geim said “In ten years time I believe the word graphene will be as widely known to the public as silicon”.

In 2005, Geim and Novoselov showed that the electrons in graphene behave like relativistic particles called “Dirac fermions” that have no rest mass. The pair also observed a new “half-integer” quantum Hall effect in the material.

More recently, Geim and Novoselov have shown that graphene has the ideal optical properties to form the transparent electrodes in liquid crystal displays (LCDs); fabricated tiny quantum dots from graphene ; and developed a new way of manufacturing sizable quantities of graphene.

The discovery of graphene triggered a surge of interest in this “wonder material”. Other researchers, for example, have found that graphene not only conducts heat very well but is also the “strongest material in the world”.

Novoselov was born in the Soviet Union in 1974 and did a PhD at the University of Nijmegen in the Netherlands before joining the University of Manchester in 2001, where he is Leverhulme Research Fellow.

Born in the Soviet Union in 1958, Geim did a PhD at the Institute of Solid State Physics in Chernogolovka, Russia. He was associate professor at the University of Nijmegen in the Netherlands before joining the University of Manchester in 2001, where he is director of the Centre for Mesoscience and Nanotechnology.

IgNobel for ‘flying frog’

Geim is also famous for his 1997 “flying frog ” experiment in which he and his colleagues in Nijmegen levitated a frog using a powerful magnet. He shared the 2000 “IgNobel” prize for his efforts.

Copyright © 2025 by IOP Publishing Ltd and individual contributors