Skip to main content

Shelf life: Peter Rodgers

What are the three best popular-science books?

By far the best popular book on science I have read is Strange Beauty: Murray Gell-Mann and the Revolution in Twentieth-Century Physics by George Johnson. Gell-Mann is an excellent subject for a biography – brilliant but flawed – and Johnson proves his equal as a biographer. Whether describing the precocious young Gell-Mann’s school days, his outstanding achievements as a theoretical physicist, or his problems in writing his own book (the underwhelming The Quark and the Jaguar), Johnson has produced a masterpiece of writing and reporting.

In the days before Amazon I spent years trying to track down a copy of Nobel Dreams: Power, Deceit and the Ultimate Experiment by Gary Taubes. Eventually I found a copy and it was well worth the wait. Based on a prolonged visit by Taubes to CERN, it is a warts-and-all description of the race between the UA1 and UA2 collaborations to discover W and Z bosons at the lab, and the subsequent – and not so successful – experimental run to search for supersymmetric particles. To say that Carlo Rubbia, who led the victorious UA1 team, emerges as larger than life is an enormous understatement (see “Carlo Rubbia and the discovery of the W and Z” Physics World January 2003 pp 23-28 for an extract from the book).

The Elegant Universe by Brian Greene might seem like an obvious choice – an international bestseller that won the Aventis Prize for Science Books in 2000 – but it is also an excellent book. After a clear introduction to the usual basics (quantum mechanics, relativity and so on), Greene moves on to more complicated matters (supersymmetry, inflation, strings and so forth), before getting stuck into the very latest (at the time) work on M-theory, branes and the like. While much of this latter material will date quite quickly, it provides an excellent insight into what it is like trying to do research at one of the frontiers of our subject.

What science books are you reading at the moment?

I have just started Soft Machines: Nanotechnology and Life by Richard Jones to help me to adjust to life after Physics World. Those wanting a quick summary can read “The future of nanotechnology” by Jones, who is a physicist at Sheffield University, in the August 2004 issue of the magazine (see “The future of nanotechnology “ Physics World August 2004 p25-29).

What else are you reading at present?

I am currently reading Van Morrison: No Surrender by Johnny Rogan, a biography of the famously irascible singer from Northern Ireland. So far there has been a lot about the R&B scene in Belfast in the first half of the 1960s – which sounds very different to the Belfast that I lived in as a PhD student in the late 1980s – and Morrison’s early days with the band Them. I am only about one-third of the way through the book but it is unlikely to contain a better description of Morrison than the following sentence from chapter eight: “With his unattractive personality, plain looks, wavy red hair, pot belly and diminutive stature, Morrison was a publicist’s nightmare.”

Which popular-science book have you never read, but feel you ought to have tackled, and why?

I cannot decide if I should read A Brief History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson. I have not read any of his previous books – I find the whole idea of comic travel writing to be depressing – but it has had tremendous reviews (at least according to the blurbs on the dust jacket) and has won the Aventis prize as well. It might also be informative to see what an outside observer makes of the whole scientific enterprise.

Sound ideas


At a Glance: Phononic crystals

  • When a wave passes through a periodic structure, interference leads to the formation of “band gaps” that prevent waves with certain frequencies travelling through the structure
  • Band gaps have been observed for electron waves in semiconductors, electromagnetic waves in photonic crystals and sound waves in phononic crystals
  • The periodic variation in the density and/or speed of sound that is needed to make a phononic crystal can be achieved by making “air holes” in an otherwise solid structure
  • The phenomenon of “negative refraction” – which can be exploited to make superlenses that can beat the diffraction limit – has been observed with phononic crystals
  • Controlling the dispersion relation for phonons both inside and outside the band gap could lead to breakthroughs in both fundamental research and applications

It is fascinating to think of the abstract beauty of crystals, with countless atoms occupying precise positions on a lattice and giving rise to perfect order and high levels of symmetry. Indeed, we need look no further than the brilliant appearance and extraordinary properties of many precious gems to witness the consequences of these precise atomic arrangements.

This picture of crystals is very appealing, but it is not strictly correct. Even in an ideal crystal that is free from defects, the atoms are never static – they are always moving randomly around their equilibrium positions. Scientists have long assumed that it is impossible to control this random thermal motion. However, a novel class of artificially structured materials known as “phononic crystals” might make such control possible.

Phononic crystals make use of the fundamental properties of waves, such as scattering and interference, to create “band gaps” – ranges of wavelength or frequency within which waves cannot propagate through the structure. This phenomenon is well known in physics: the electrons in a semiconductor can only occupy certain energy bands, while photonic crystals only allow light in certain frequency ranges to travel through them.

The band gap in a photonic crystal is caused by a periodic variation in the refractive index of an artificially structured material. In a phononic crystal the density and/or elastic constants of the structure change periodically. This changes the speed of sound in the crystal, which, in turn, leads to the formation of a phononic band gap.

But why mention waves at all when talking about random atomic motions? The reason is that the atoms in a solid cannot move independently of each other because they are connected by chemical bonds. When an atom is displaced from its equilibrium position, it exerts a force on its neighbours, which causes them to move. These atoms then cause their neighbours to move, and the end result is the creation of a “phonon” – a special wave of lattice distortion that propagates through the solid.

Where do band gaps come from?

Acoustic waves differ from light waves in several ways. Acoustic waves are mechanical, which means that they cannot travel through a vacuum, whereas light waves are electromagnetic and can travel through a vacuum. In general, mechanical waves passing through a gas or a liquid are known as acoustic waves, while those passing through a solid are called elastic waves.

There are other important differences between mechanical and electromagnetic waves. Whereas a light wave can have two independent polarizations, an elastic wave in a homogeneous solid has three independent polarizations: two of these are transverse (shear waves) and one is longitudinal (a compression wave). However, since shear waves are not supported in liquids and gases, an acoustic wave has just one longitudinal polarization.

The propagation of mechanical waves in a medium is usually described by a dispersion relation that relates the frequency, w, and wave vector, k, of the propagating wave. The dispersion relation for waves travelling in a homogeneous medium is very simple: ω =c • k, where c is the velocity of sound in the medium. However, the dispersion relations for materials that are not homogeneous – such as phononic crystals (figure 1) – are more complicated.

But why are certain waves not allowed to propagate in phononic crystals? To get an intuitive understanding of how band gaps form, consider a 1D crystal composed of alternating layers of two different materials. At every interface an incoming wave transfers part of its energy into secondary, reflected waves, which then interfere with each other.

If this interference is constructive, all the energy of the original wave is reflected back and the wave cannot propagate through the crystal. On the other hand, if the interference is destructive, then all energy of the original wave is transmitted through the crystal. Therefore, constructive interference of the secondary waves results in the creation of a band gap, while destructive interference leads to the formation of propagation bands.

The condition for constructive interference is simply that the path differences between the interfering waves must be equal to an integer multiple of their wavelength, λ. Since the path difference is determined by the lattice parameter of the crystal, a, it is easy to see that constructive interference occurs when the lattice parameter is comparable to the wavelength. And since frequency is inversely proportional to wavelength, the frequency at the centre of the band gap, wg, is also inversely proportional to the lattice parameter: ωg ∼ 1⁄λ ∼ 1⁄a. As a result, we can create a band gap at any frequency or wavelength we choose by simply changing the size of the unit cell. The width of the band gap is directly related to the ratio of the densities and sound velocities in the different layers: the larger the ratio, the wider the gap.

Moreover, the position and width of the band gap depend on the direction of the waves because the path difference depends on the angle of incidence. Some phononic crystals form band gaps for waves propagating in any direction – these are known as absolute or complete band gaps. Other materials possess partial band gaps that only stop waves travelling in certain directions. It is easy to see that a 1D crystal does not have an absolute band gap because its mechanical properties only vary in one direction: waves travelling at right angles to this direction will not be reflected, so there will not be a band gap in this direction.

Symmetry and phononic band gaps

How do we design a phononic crystal to have a complete band gap? It is clear from our 1D example that the density and sound velocity need to vary in all three directions of space. However, very few 3D periodic structures will form a complete phononic band gap. In fact, it is still quite difficult to determine the structures with large absolute band gaps. For electromagnetic waves, which only have two independent (transverse) polarizations, sinusoidal modulations of the dielectric constant along certain directions create photonic crystals with absolute gaps for three different, highly symmetric lattices: simple cubic, body-centred cubic and face-centred cubic. The diamond structure, which is face-centred cubic, possesses the champion photonic band gap, i.e. the largest band gap for a given dielectric constant.

Mechanical waves can have both longitudinal and transverse components in a solid, although only longitudinal waves are allowed in fluids. As a result, if we want to create a complete phononic band gap, we must design structures that have band gaps for both longitudinal and transverse waves in the same frequency region. This could be harder than designing structures for photonic crystals because electromagnetic waves only have transverse modes.

The search for structures with complete phononic band gaps began in 1992 with theoretical work by Michael Sigalas and Eleftherios Economou while they were both at Iowa State University in the US. They showed that structures that consist of a periodic 3D lattice of identical high-density spheres placed within a low-density host material gave rise to phononic band gaps. These structures can either be solid-solid or liquid-liquid.

Despite the fact that elastic waves propagate at two different speeds in solids while acoustic waves propagate at a single speed in fluids, Sigalas and Economou predicted that complete phononic band gaps should exist in solid-fluid structures, as well as solid-solid and fluid-fluid structures. A few months later they showed that an infinite 2D array of high-density parallel cylinders embedded in a low-density host material should also possess a complete band gap in two dimensions. Unaware of this work, Manvir Kushwaha of the Universidad Autónoma de Puebla and co-workers reported the existence of phononic band gaps for polarized elastic waves in 2D elastic systems in 1993.

The existence of structures with complete phononic band gaps has obvious applications. For instance, a phononic crystal will reflect incoming sound waves with frequencies within the gap and can therefore be used as an acoustic isolator. Moreover, the introduction of defects within the structure allows sound waves with frequencies in the band gap to be trapped near a point-like defect (figure 2), or guided along linear defects.

Phononic crystals and sound

Sound manipulation is perhaps the most obvious application of phononic crystals. Sound is immensely valuable in our daily lives for communication, information transfer or simply for its aesthetic value as exhibited in music and rhythms. For human hearing, sound is basically made up of acoustic waves with frequencies roughly between 20 Hz and 20 kHz, or wavelengths ranging from metres to several tens of centimetres. Therefore, if we assemble periodic structures with lattice constants in this range, we can expect them to inhibit sound and act as sonic mirrors.

A great illustration of the sonic properties of a periodic structure was provided by Francisco Meseguer and co-workers at the Materials Science Institute of Madrid in 1995 when they studied the acoustic characteristics of a kinematic sculpture by Eusebio Sempere (figure 3). This minimalist sculpture consists of a periodic square array of hollow steel cylinders.

In addition to being visually appealing, Meseguer and co-workers recognized that the sculpture should also possess a sonic band gap, so they measured the acoustic transmission of the sculpture as a function of frequency and direction. They found that sound travelling perpendicular to the axes of the cylinders was strongly attenuated at a frequency of 1670 Hz – a result that provided the first experimental evidence for the existence of phononic band gaps in periodic structures (Nature 378 241).

Unfortunately, a structure needs to be several metres wide to create a phononic band gap in the sonic regime. While this might not be a problem for architectural acoustics, it is impractical for many other devices such as headphones and speakers. However, if we move to the ultrasonic regime, the relevant wavelengths are much shorter, so the phononic crystals are also much smaller (from centimetres down to fractions of millimetres). This smaller length scale – combined with negative refraction, superlenses and other advances – could lead to a wide range of applications for phononic crystals.

Ultrasound, negative refraction and superlenses

One of the hottest topics in optics over the past five years has been the possibility of making “superlenses” with materials that have a negative refractive index. And just as photonic band gaps were followed by phononic band gaps, recent progress in making superlenses for electromagnetic waves has prompted efforts to make superlenses for acoustic waves.

In general it is not possible for a conventional lens to produce an image that contains details that are finer than the wavelength of the light being focused. However, superlenses made of “negative index” materials can overcome this diffraction limit. Moreover, these superlenses do not even have to be shaped like traditional lenses – a flat, thin slab of negative-index material can act as a superlens, which means that they should, in theory, be much easier to fabricate than traditional lenses.

In optics the challenge has been to make materials that have a negative refractive index at the appropriate wavelength (see “Superlens breaks optical barrier” Physics World August pp23-24). Recent research suggests that it might be possible to make acoustic superlenses with phononic crystals.

The speed of light or sound in a medium depends on the refractive index of that medium. And when light or sound travels from one medium into another with a different refractive index, both its speed and direction change. This is refraction. Most traditional materials exhibit positive refraction, but some specially designed materials can exhibit negative refraction (figure 4).

Negative refraction in phononic crystals is possible due to multiple scattering of sound waves at the solid-air interfaces. To get an intuitive understanding of negative refraction consider a sound wave moving through a homogeneous medium that strikes a phononic crystal at an angle. We can think of the sound wave as having two components: one that travels parallel to the surface, and one that moves at right angles to it. Negative refraction will occur if the direction of the parallel component is reversed while that of the normal wave does not change. This is actually possible if the parallel component is reflected by the phononic crystal while the normal wave is allowed to propagate.

In 2004 Xiandong Zhang of Beijing Normal University and Zhengyou Liu of Wuhan University, both in China, predicted that negative refraction would occur in 2D hexagonal “fluid-fluid” crystals consisting of water cylinders in a mercury matrix. They used a detailed analysis of a phononic band diagram to derive conditions for all-angle negative refraction of acoustic waves, and simulated the propagation of a wave through a flat slab of negative-refraction material.

Meanwhile, Jian Zi and co-workers at Fudan University, also in China, demonstrated experimentally a superlens for liquid surface waves for the first time in 2004 (figure 4). The development of superlenses for acoustic waves would be a major breakthrough for a variety of ultrasound techniques.

Hypersound and thermal management

Wavelengths in the hypersonic regime are even shorter than those used for ultrasound. Indeed, hypersonic wavelengths are less than 10 μm, which corresponds to frequencies higher than 100 MHz. However, the behaviour of hypersonic phonons is crucial for many physical phenomena in materials. For example, the interaction between electrons and high-frequency phonons determines the efficiency of spontaneous light emission in silicon and other semiconductor materials that have an “indirect” electronic band gap. Greater control over the phonons in silicon could therefore lead to highly efficient silicon-based light-emitting devices. Making such devices is a major goal for the optoelectronics industry.

Hypersonic phononic crystals could also have a large impact in thermal management. Thermal energy in solids is transported primarily by electrons and phonons. The electronic contribution is important for materials with a large number of free carriers, such as metals. On the other hand, the thermal conductivity of dielectric materials and many semiconductors is determined mainly by the phonons. The presence of a phononic band gap would reduce the flow of phonons and therefore the thermal conductivity of a solid.

This could prove very useful for thermoelectric devices that directly convert thermal energy into electricity. The figure of merit for a thermoelectric device, which is known as ZT, scales as ZT ∼ σ ⁄(ke + kph), where σ is the electrical conductivity, and ke and kph are the electronic and phononic heat conductivities, respectively. If we reduce the electronic heat conductivity, ke, we will also reduce the electrical conductivity, σ, which means that ZT will not increase. However, by using a phononic band gap to reduce the phononic heat conductivity, kph, it could be possible to greatly improve the performance of devices such as Peltier thermoelectric coolers, thermocouples and thermoelectric energy generators.

However, it is not easy to design and fabricate hypersonic crystals. In contrast to sonic and ultrasonic crystals, which are macroscopic and can be readily made using standard manufacturing techniques, hypersonic crystals require 3D periodic patterns to be created at the submicron and nanometre scale. A variety of techniques are being explored for the fabrication of such structures. For example, some researchers are trying to build hypersonic crystals from alternating layers of two materials using lithography-based techniques from the semiconductor industry. Others use two-photon lithography to pattern the inside of photosensitive polymers with lasers. Some groups are also investigating self-assembly techniques.

Each of these methods has a variety of advantages and drawbacks. Recently another approach – holographic interference lithography – has received much attention. Since light is inherently periodic, the overlap of multiple beams of light can result in interesting periodic patterns. For example, when two laser beams are brought together, they form a 1D periodic intensity pattern, while the interference of three beams results in 2D patterns and so on.

If the laser beams overlap inside a photosensitive material, it is possible to turn the light intensity pattern of the light into a solid structure. At the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) we have recently been able to fabricate various 2D and 3D periodic structures using interference lithography and then, working with George Fytas at the Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research in Mainz, Germany, directly measure their phononic dispersion relation using Brillouin light scattering. Previously, Maya Campbell, Andrew Turberfield and co-workers at Oxford University had used interference lithography to make photonic crystals.

“Blind” and “deaf” materials

Since the same basic ideas underpin both phononic and photonic band-gap materials, it seems obvious to explore the possibility of making materials that exhibit both types of band gap. Indeed, at MIT two of the present authors (MM and ELT) have recently designed a crystal that is “blind” to electromagnetic waves with wavelengths of about several hundred nanometres and “deaf” to sound at similar wavelengths within the crystal. These crystals consist of a square or triangular 2D array of air holes in silicon. In addition to having complete band gaps for both light and elastic waves, we have found that they can also simultaneously trap sound and light at defects.

The ability to make structures with both types of band gap could lead to breakthroughs in the field of acousto-optics. In 1997, for example, Harold de Wijn and co-workers at the University of Utrecht in the Netherlands suggested that it might be possible to use these structures to generate intense sources of coherent monochromatic phonons, which could be known as “phonon lasers”. Other applications could include optical cooling in solids and optical frequency-conversion devices.

In 2002 Alex Fanstein and co-workers at the Centro Atómico Bariloche in Argentina and the LPN-CNRS laboratory at Marcoussis in France measured photon-phonon scattering in 1D periodic structures that contained both photonic and phononic band gaps. Since all the layers in the phononic structure were only several nanometres thick, they did not get in the way of the light. Fanstein and co-workers showed that such double localization of photons and phonons increases the efficiency of photon-phonon scattering by five orders of magnitude compared with the values for similar 1D structures with photonic cavities only.

The field of phononic crystals is only about 10 years old and many important questions are just being raised. The search for the best phononic structure is ongoing, but even the very definition of the “best phononic structure” still needs to be clarified. What goes on outside the band gap is often just as important in phononic applications.

Negative refraction, for instance, is made possible by the unusual properties of the dispersion relation in the propagation band. And to get light out of silicon with the help of phonons it is necessary to increase rather than decrease the phononic density of states. We must therefore think in terms of engineering the dispersion relation for phonons, rather than simply making the band gap as large as possible.

Phononic crystals will provide researchers in acoustics and ultrasonics with new components that offer the same level of control over sound that mirrors and lenses provide over light. But hypersonic phononic crystals can also be used for fundamental science. They could, for example, be used to explore changes to the statistical distribution of random phonons under equilibrium and non-equilibrium conditions, or to study how phononic band gaps affect the thermal properties of materials.

It is difficult to predict how the field of phononic crystals will develop in the future, but one thing is clear: we will hear a lot more about these materials in every sense of the word.

More about: Phononic crystals

G Chen et al. 2004 Engineering nanoscale phonon and photon transport for direct energy conversion Superlattices and Microstructures 35 161

T Gorishnyy et al. 2005 Hypersonic phononic crystals Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 115501

J Sánchez-Dehesa 2004 Phononic crystals bring sound to a focus Physics World September p23

M M Sigalas and E N Economou 1993 Band structure of elastic waves in two-dimensional systems Solid State Commun. 86 141

M Trigo et al. 2002 Confinement of acoustical vibrations in a semiconductor planar phonon cavity Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 227402

X Zhang and Z Liu 2004 Negative refraction of acoustic waves in two-dimensional phononic crystals App. Phys. Lett. 85 341

Saturn’s moon reveals its secrets

Titan lies ten times further away from the Sun than Earth and has never been studied directly. Previous missions like the fly-by Voyager spacecraft in 1980 and 1981 were unable to penetrate through the thick organic haze surrounding the moon. Earlier this year, the Cassini mission took remote images of Titan while orbiting Saturn using various onboard instruments. But the Huygens probe has now made the first in-situ study of the moon’s atmosphere and surface using six different instruments.

Titan’s atmosphere is mainly nitrogen, along with small amounts of organic material such as methane. The pressure at the surface is about 1.5 atmospheres, which is quite similar to the Earth, but the temperature is only about 90 K according to measurements made with the Huygens Atmospheric Structure Instrument (Nature 438 800). At such low temperatures, the methane in Titan’s atmosphere could play a similar role to the water in Earth’s atmosphere.

The aerosols that make up Titan’s clouds have solid cores consisting of organic molecules containing carbon and nitrogen, according to data from another Huygens instrument — the Aerosol Collector and Pyrolyser (Nature 438 796). It captured and heated aerosols in Titan’s atmosphere when the probe descended onto the moon’s surface. These aerosols were then sent to a Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer, which found the presence of nitrogen-containing organic compounds that steadily fall onto Titan’s surface as rain (Nature 438 779). The results also suggest that the nitrogen originally arrived on Titan as a mixture of compounds, such as ammonia, and then broke down into molecular nitrogen – like on Earth.

A further three papers describe various other characteristics of Titan. These include measurements of its winds, which blow in the same direction as the moon rotates and have speeds of about 1 metre per second. The Descent Imager/Spectral Radiometer (DISR) showed that Titan’s landscape resembles that of Earth’s except that features, like dry riverbeds, have been forged from liquid methane and not water. Finally, the surface of Titan has been found to have the consistency of wet sand but is made up of condensed methane, ice and aerosols.

Einstein to star in global webcast

Among the activities will be a link up with Nobel laureates and other physicists at the 2005 Solvay conference in Brussels; “The late show with Leon Lederman” from Fermilab near Chicago, featuring interviews with young physicists, demonstrations and live music; and discussions about the past and future of the Web from the CERN laboratory in Geneva and Imperial College in London. There will also be a live connection to the Ice Cube neutrino experiment at the South Pole and a videoconference with the VIRGO gravitational wave experiment near Pisa.

The event is being held as part of the 2005 World Year of Physics.

Nanotube foams are strong and flexible

Pulickel Ajayan of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and colleagues at the University of Hawaii at Manoa and the University of Florida created arrays of vertically aligned nanotubes by chemical vapour deposition. The nanotubes formed an open-cell foam system, with a porosity of around 87%.

In general, the more flexible the foam, the less strong it is. For example, increasing the voids in a typical foam increases its compressibility but rapidly lowers its strength. However, nanotube foams are unusual in that they are both extremely strong – with a compressive strength of 12 to 15 megapascals – and very flexible. In contrast, typical low-density flexible foams, such as latex rubber and polyurethane, have a compressive strength of about 20 to 30 kilopascals.

The team looked at the foams with a scanning electron microscope and found that the nanotubes formed regular buckles along their axis. “The most fascinating thing is that all the nanotubes unanimously buckle at the same wavelength towards the same direction – they do not buckle randomly,” says team member Anyuan Cao of the University of Hawaii. Moreover, the foams recover rapidly when the load is removed and have good fatigue resistance, suffering less than 15% deformation after thousands of cycles.

According to Cao, the nanotube foams could have applications as cushioning pads, energy absorbing coatings, and damping layers, while nanotubes with buckles could be used to make electromechanical devices such as actuators.

The scientists now plan to explore the electrical properties of compressed nanotubes by, for example, monitoring the change in electrical conductivity that takes place when the nanotubes buckle. They also aim to tailor the mechanical properties of the nanotubes for different applications by controlling the buckling wavelength, which determines the strength of buckled tubes, or by using aligned single-walled nanotubes.

Tiny swimmer makes a splash

“There is vision in nanotechnology of tiny autonomous robots going from one place to another in the human body and fixing things,” says Joseph Avron of Technion-Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa. “One major challenge is to figure out how to do this if you are very small – the modes of locomotion that are efficient when you are big will perform poorly if you are small.”

The new swimmer, known as “pushmepullyou”, consists of two spherical elastic bladders that exchange volumes of material with each other during each swimming stroke. Avron and two colleagues – Oded Kenneth and David Oaknin – predict that their robot will move more efficiently than bacteria and other biological organisms that move by beating a flagellum. Moreover, the pushmepullyou travels faster than other artificial swimmers, like three-linked spheres, because it swims a larger distance with every stroke (see figure and movie). The Israel team says that a real pushmepullyou swimmer could be made by filling the bladders with a low-viscosity liquid.

The movement of the two-sphere micro-swimmer resembles the wriggling motion of certain protozoa and species of a microorganism known as Euglena. Some biologists think that this motion, which is called metaboly, is related to feeding, while others speculate that it is used for swimming instead. The work of Avron and colleagues suggests that metaboly is an efficient swimming mode.

The team is now studying nanoscale-sized robots that could swim inside channels in the body – such as inside the spine, heart or lungs – and take images or deliver drugs. “We are also studying swimmers that are so small that quantum mechanics effects become relevant,” says Avron, although he points out that this work is quite remote from potential applications at present.

Pseudogap puzzle for superconductors

Superconductivity is the complete absence of electrical resistance in a material. It is observed in certain materials when they are cooled to below their superconducting transition temperature, and occurs when electrons overcome their mutual Coulomb repulsion to form “Cooper pairs”. In the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory of low-temperature superconductivity, the electrons are held together because of their interactions with phonons – quantized vibrations of the crystal lattice.

Most high-temperature superconductors consist of layers of copper and oxygen, separated by metal atoms such as yttrium and barium, and they can have transition temperatures as high as 138 Kelvin. Developing a theory to explain high-temperature superconductivity, which was discovered in these cuprate materials in 1986, has long been one of the outstanding challenges in condensed-matter physics. However, most theorists have assumed that electron-phonon interactions would not play an important role in any successful theory.

One of the defining characteristics of a superconductor is the energy gap – the energy that is needed to break a Cooper pair into two free electrons. However, in the mid-1990s physicists discovered evidence for a similar gap – which they called a pseudogap – in so-called underdoped materials at temperatures well above the transition temperature. It was also found that other electronic properties of the cuprates change with direction in momentum space. These two features – the pseudogap and the variation of electronic properties with direction – have long been considered as hallmarks of high-temperature superconductivity.

However, Zhi-Xun Shen of Stanford University and colleagues in the US, Canada, Japan and the Netherlands have now observed a pseudogap in a completely different material – a metallic manganite compound containing lanthanum, strontium, manganese and oxygen. This material exhibits “colossal magnetoresistance”, becoming a ferromagnet when it is cooled below a certain critical temperature. This phase change, which is thought to result from interactions between electrons and phonons, is accompanied by a huge drop in electrical resistance.

Shen’s team used a technique called angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) to measure the electron velocity and scattering rate as a function of energy. These spectra reveal that the electron motion in the ferromagnet phase is strongly linked to the vibrations of the crystal lattice. Moreover, the spectra vary with direction in momentum space and display evidence for a pseudogap, which is similar to the behaviour seen in high-temperature superconductors.

The results suggest that the pseudogap is a general feature of all transition metal oxides, not just cuprate superconductors, and that theorists may have to rethink the role played by phonons in high-temperature superconductivity.

Breakthrough for quantum measurement

A Josephson junction consists of two superconducting layers separated by a thin insulating layer. Brian Josephson of Cambridge University won the Nobel prize in 1973 for predicting, while he was still a PhD student, that the Cooper pairs in the superconducting layers would be able to tunnel through the insulating layer without losing their superconducting properties. Josephson junctions are widely used in many electronic devices, including logic circuits, memory cells and amplifiers. Superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs), also rely on the junctions to measure extremely small magnetic fields.

In the classical regime, the junction behaves like an inductance. In the 1980s, however, theorists predicted that a Josephson junction would behave like a capacitor if it was small enough. Now, Per Delsing and colleagues at Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden, and independently, Pertti Hakonen and co-workers at Helsinki University of Technology and the Landau Institute of Theoretical Physics in Moscow have observed this effect in experiments for the first time.

The Sweden team measured the effect in a Cooper-pair transistor, a device that contains two Josephson junctions in series (Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 206806). The Helsinki-Moscow group saw the effect in a Cooper-pair box, which contains one junction (Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 206807).

Delsing and colleagues at Chalmers University began by embedding their Cooper-pair transistor in a resonant circuit. Next, they cooled the device down to millikelvin temperatures and measured how the phase of a radio-frequency signal changed when it was reflected from the circuit. Based on these measurements, the team was able to show that the device behaved like a quantum capacitor. Hakonen and co-workers in Helsinki and Moscow group employed a similar technique. Both teams found that the devices behaved as predicted by theory.

The effect could be used to read out quantum bits (qubits) in a reliable way because the quantum capacitance of the excited state of the qubit has the opposite sign to the ground state. These states could be used as the “1s” and “0s” in a quantum computer. Indeed Hakonen and colleagues have already used this approach to read the value of a qubit without changing its value — which is almost always a problem when measuring the quantum state of any system.

“In the future, the Josephson capacitance could be used for operations in a large-scale quantum computer,” says Mika Sillanpaa of Helsinki University. “The Josephson inductance and Josephson capacitance together would also allow us to build new types of quantum ‘band engineered’ electronic devices, such as low-noise parametric amplifiers.”

Nanotubes beam out bright light

Phaedon Avouris of IBM Research, Jie Liu of Duke University and co-workers began by laying down nanotubes with diameters of 2-3 nanometres by chemical vapour deposition. The nanotubes spanned trenches in a silica coating on a silicon substrate. Palladium source and drain electrodes were then added to the nanotubes.

The IBM-Duke team found that when certain voltages were applied, the nanotubes emitted infrared light at the junction between the suspended and supported parts of the tubes. The emission was localized in a nano-sized area, which resulted in a very bright source of light: a 3 milliamp current was able to produce about 105 times more photon flux than a large area LED.

The scientists believe the location of the emission is due to bending of the conduction and valence bands at the interface between the suspended and supported regions. This accelerates charge carriers (electrons or holes), which then create bound electron-hole pairs (called excitons) that recombine to emit light. According to the team, this excitation mechanism is about 1000 times more efficient than the conventional recombination of independently injected electrons and holes.

Avouris says that the nanotubes emit light with a wavelength of 1-2 microns, which covers the wavelengths employed in optical communications. Moreover, it is possible to tune the emission wavelength, producing either infrared or visible light, by using nanotubes with different diameters.

Chaos protects networks in Athens

Claudio Mirasso of the Universitat de les Illes Ballears in Spain, and co-workers in Greece, France, Italy, Spain, Germany and the UK, have shown that it is possible to embed the data in a chaotic signal, send it a distance of 120 kilometres, and then decrypt it at the other end. The team, which is part of the EU-funded OCCULT project, transmitted data at rates of 2.4 gigabits per second over a network in Athens, Greece.

Mirasso and co-workers used of a pair of laser diodes that were driven by nonlinear feedback so that their outputs became chaotic. Data is embedded in the output of the laser at the transmitter, which makes eavesdropping very difficult. Moreover, since chaotic signals contain a wide range of frequencies, they are robust to interference effects. At the receiver, the chaotic output from the second laser – which is synchronized with the first laser – is subtracted to leave the data.

According to Mirasso, who is the project co-ordinator, the chaos-based approach is attractive because it is compatible with both installed optical fibre and the popular transmission technique known as wavelength division multiplexing (WDM). “Our preliminary results suggest that the security can be high, but we have not quantified it yet,” says Mirasso. “This is the main task we have for the future – to define, test and calibrate the security that our system can offer.”

Copyright © 2026 by IOP Publishing Ltd and individual contributors