Skip to main content

Quasar images confirm potential of virtual telescopes

HALCA was launched by Japanese astronomers in 1997 to detect radio signals at wavelengths that that are difficult to detect from the ground. In addition to conducting their own observations, the HALCA team have co-ordinated a series of observations with ground-based telescopes to produce enhanced images of quasars. These immensely energetic and distant objects are thought to be powered by supermassive black holes that consume gas and stars from surrounding galaxies. The VSOP images include unprecedented detail of jets of material close to the quasar’s core. They reveal complex jet-like structures which suggest that the material powering the quasars suffers from magnetic instabilities associated with a spinning black hole.

“The new observations with HALCA are scientifically important in themselves”, according to Martin Hardcastle, a radio astronomer at Bristol University in the UK, “since they probe active galactic nuclei with a combination of physical size and frequency that has not been accessible until now. They also represent an important proof that orbiting VLBI can work and produce science that complements existing ground-based arrays.”

Small companies get the EU research bug

According to the report, over 80% of the SMEs that received an award during 1995-97 had never taken part in an EU project before, and some 8000 companies had never been involved in any sort of public research project. And the number of SMEs involved in 4th Framework was 231% higher than in its predecessor. Framework projects are private-public partnerships, with the EU providing 50% of the funds on average, and industry supplying the rest. The average project has 4.8 partners and receives ECU 730000 from the EU.

The results of two surveys published in the report show that 40% of companies involved had entered new markets for the first time and increased their workforce. And it was found that for every ECU invested in research as part of the ESPRIT information technology project, over ECU 11 of economic output had been generated eight years later. The details of the 5th Framework is currently being debated.

Computers from chaos

It has been know for sometime that nature follows chaotic patterns that seem to allow organisms to respond to rapid changes in their environment. Sinha and Ditto have taken these equations further to form the basis of crude computer instructions. They defined a one-dimensional lattice of logistic maps in the form f(x) = ax(1-x), where the nonlinearity parameter, a, is chosen to make the system chaotic. When a point within the lattice goes above a self-regulating threshold, it triggers a response in the system, such as transferring information to another point in the network. The researchers constructed their logic operations by observing the behaviour of the threshold value. For example, if the site equals the threshold value, they treat the system output as state 1 (ON). If it is below the threshold, the site can be taken as in state 0 (OFF). By adjusting the threshold point, different types of electronic gates – such as OR and NOR gates – can be formed. Sinha and Ditto believe that the first application of their work will be in optical computing.

New light on plasma properties

Previous experiments found it difficult to measure plasma spectra because the high temperatures inside the plasma caused the spectral lines to blur. The Weizmann team solved the problem by adding oxygen ions to the plasma: these ions are less disturbed by the heat and density inside the plasma and produce clear spectral lines. Maron’s team were able to measure the oxygen spectral lines, and hence the current in the plasma, every billionth of a second. They found that when the current first hit the “roll” of plasma, it flowed on the outside of their sample. By measuring how far the current penetrated the plasma, they were able to determine the velocities of the particles inside the plasma. Under the influence of the applied magnetic field, some particles reached velocities of 100 kilometres per second. Closer studies of current, and hence magnetic fields, in plasmas can allow scientists to improve plasma compression and help generate fusion.

SOHO is safe

Luckily, SOHO drifted back into sunlight long enough to recharge its solar cells for communications with Earth, and in the past month the fuel has been heated from -100 C to 10 C. Engineers had to be careful not to rupture the tanks while heating the fuel. The tanks have survived so far and the next step is to fire thruster rockets to manoeuvre SOHO so that it faces the Sun again. This procedure will be carried out early next week.

“This is one of the most dramatic deep-space rescues ever attempted, and I’m delighted to say it looks to be going exactly to plan, ” says Richard Harrison of the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory near in Oxford. “For six weeks we had no idea if SOHO would ever get back in touch. This was a race against time, because without power and without direction from Earth it wouldn’t be long before SOHO’s orbit decayed. That would be a great shame – even though SOHO had already completed its main mission we were hopeful for more information.”

In related news the joint NASA-ESA Investigation Board has concluded that the original mistake was a direct result of operational errors, including a failure to adequately monitor spacecraft status by the Goddard Space Flight Center.

Trapping breakthrough for molecules

Many of the optical and magnetic techniques used to trap and cool atoms do not work with molecules because they have complex internal energy levels. Instead Doyle and his colleagues chilled the molecules by cooling the walls of a container filled with a mixture of helium atoms and calcium monohydride molecules. The molecules were cooled as a result of collisions with the atoms. The Harvard team then applied a magnetic field to push the molecules to the centre of the chamber. The most energetic molecules escaped the field but over 100 million remained trapped in the centre at a temperature of 400 mK ± 50 mK for as long as two seconds. Doyle now hopes to improve the design of the trap to increase the confinement time. He also plans to remove the helium atoms from the chamber using a vacuum pump, which will further reduce the temperature of the molecules through the process of evaporative cooling.

Are science and religion compatible?

There is currently a considerable resurgence of interest in the debate between science and religion. This is evident in the writings of both “creation scientists” and “new age” enthusiasts. But despite their substantial public following, neither group is part of the serious academic debate, because they do not give sufficiently earnest attention to scientific issues.

There are, however, two main camps that do take science seriously. On one side are some dogmatic atheistic scientists and philosophers, who show great rigidity and exhibit absolute certainty in their claims – even though these are of a metaphysical nature, way beyond the domain in which any degree of scientific certainty is attainable. On the other side is an increasing number of scientist-theologians and philosophers, who show a greater flexibility in their approach and a better understanding of the philosophical issues involved.

Prominent among the latter is John Polkinghorne – quantum physicist, fellow of the Royal Society, former president of Queen’s College, Cambridge, and an ordained Anglican priest. He has written prolifically in this area, and this book provides an intelligent and well written summary of some of his views. It covers three main areas. First, he presents a cautiously revised form of natural theology. Then he gives a methodological comparison of science and theology that exhibits their common concern in the search for truth. Finally, Polkinghorne speculates about how physical process might be sufficiently open to accommodate both human and divine agency. The book also contains some interesting speculations on the prospects for future dialogue between science and religion.

In the section on natural theology, the author considers signs of “mind” and “purpose” in the structure of the physical universe – first discussing the apparent rationality of the universe, before turning to the modern-day version of the “argument from design”. As one interpretation of the anthropic principle, this is based on the observation that only particular kinds of universes are capable of producing systems of sufficient complexity to sustain conscious life. The apparent conclusion is that this fine-tuning in our universe is evidence either that God is real, or that there are many and varied universes (although possibly both could be true).

Polkinghorne then examines and criticizes the various ways in which the multi-universe option on its own might hold. He believes that they either still require major fine-tuning, or are “far beyond anything that can be called genuinely scientific in their prodigal conjecture”. He proposes instead that the theological option – that God is real – provides an intellectually satisfying understanding of what would otherwise be unintelligible good fortune. However, he emphasizes that this line of argument does not necessarily prove God’s existence, but offers instead an insightful account of what is going on. This account does not aim to rival a scientific explanation, he says, but “aims to complement that explanation by setting it within a wider and more profound understanding”. The relationship of this view to issues of value is cogently discussed, the author concluding that “we live in a world which is the carrier of value at all levels of our meeting with it. Only a metaphysical account which is prepared to acknowledge that this is so can be considered at all adequate”.

The discussion in the next section on the similarities between scientific and theological method is based on seeing both as examples of “critical realism”. His approach takes evidence seriously and provides a rational middle way between certainty and relativism, proposing that science and theology aim to understand different aspects of reality using quite different kinds of data. The author also gives an interesting parallel analysis of the development of theories in science and theology. He argues that progress leads in each case to moments of new synthesis and understanding in which a new theory is revealed, but also to a continued wrestling with new unsolved problems.

In the author’s view, the most troubling issue in this view of science and theology as parallel ways of seeking truth is the great variety of religious faiths, as opposed to the much more unified view attained by science. However, he suggests that despite this variety, we can see the world’s religions as all seeking to speak of a shared encounter with spiritual reality. The impressive success of science in answering questions to universal satisfaction is seen to derive not from the possession of utterly distinctive methodology, but rather “from the comparative tractability of its subject material: an impersonal physical world open to experimental manipulation”. Polkinghorne points out that this is “in contrast to the more subtle realms of unrepeatable experience which correspond to personal encounter and to the transpersonal meeting with the divine”.

Perhaps the most controversial part of the book is the chapter entitled “Does God act in the physical world?”. This investigates what one can say about this question, while also taking seriously what science says about the regularity of processes in the physical world. Polkinghorne suggests a variety of approaches. For example, he invokes quantum uncertainty or suitable macroscopic processes as the enabling feature that could allow such action.

The suggestion that I find most problematic is that the sensitivity to initial conditions in chaotic dynamical systems might allow a causal principle enabling such action. Be that as it may, the author does indeed show that there are a variety of ways in which a God may be able to influence the detailed course of worldly events, even though that God voluntarily chooses – as an essential part of his action as creator – to maintain the laws of physics in unchanging form. The question of the nature of time comes in here in an essential and somewhat mysterious way, mirroring the mysterious nature of time in quantum cosmology.

This book presents a carefully thought out and well defended, if somewhat orthodox (Anglican) position. Apart from any engagement that they may have with the theological issues, there are two features of the discussion that may be interesting to practising scientists. The first is this view of theology as a rational, evidence-based discipline – in contrast to the view held (not without justification) by many of theology as a purely dogmatic subject. The other feature of the book is its reflection on the way that science is conducted in practice, as opposed to the idealized way scientific development is often presented.

Because we cannot each carry out all of the scientific experiments on which the present-day scientific world-view is based, science in fact proceeds to a considerable degree on the basis of faith in what is written in highly esteemed texts and taking on trust what is said by recognized authority figures. Furthermore, not all experimental data are taken seriously – one weighs the data against who carried out the observations and how well their results fit into current theory. And one’s choice of theory takes place to a significant extent on the basis of non-empirical factors. In other words, the distance from enlightened theological practice is not as great as some would like to suggest, and Polkinghorne’s book contains interesting comments making this case.

From technology to jobs

Yet technology is now associated with unemployment and social distress in many countries, as the OECD notes. “However, technology per se is not the culprit, ” the report continues. “Its economy-wide employment impact is likely to be positive provided that the mechanisms for translating technology into jobs are not impaired by deficiencies in training and innovation systems, and rigidities in product, labour and financial markets.” In other words, technology and innovation policies cannot work in isolation and have to be integrated into government policies on everything from economics to education.
  The report looks at the interactions between technology, productivity and job creation in an era of globalization and knowledge-based economies, and makes recommendations under five broad headings: the need for technology to play a key role in all governments policies; the use of technical change to increase productivity; the conditions for technical progress to create jobs; the need to make innovation and technology policies more efficient; and the political aspects of such reforms. Specific recommendations include increased incentives for university-industry collaboration, incentives for rival companies to work on pre-competitive research, improvements in the efficiency of various subsidies and tax breaks used to encourage R&D in industry, and increased flexibility in public research organizations (for example, making it easier for scientists to set up their own companies).
  All this activity, however, will require financial support, yet the amount of R&D funded by governments has stagnated since the early 1980s, and declined in many countries during the 1990s. There are signs that some governments are looking to reverse this trend – the US and Japan have discussed large increases, while the UK has actually confirmed a 24% increase over the next three years – but the outlook is not so bright in industry, where basic research is continuing to decline as companies focus their R&D on short-term product development. This will inevitably limit the ability of some firms to take advantage of new scientific knowledge. Although the OECD calls on governments to find new “mechanisms to stimulate…in-house basic research capabilities in industry”, it can offer no answers. “To date none of the OECD countries seems to have come up with incentives to prevent the drying up of in-house basic research in industry, ” it concludes.
  The degree to which we live in a world that depends on services rather than manufacturing is also evident in the report. Some two-thirds of the business activity, and 70% of the jobs, within the 29 member countries of the OECD are in services. Indeed, the report warns that there is “too much focus” on the high-tech segment of the economy, which is relatively small, at the expense of fostering innovation and technology diffusion throughout the economy. But there is good news for those in the high-tech sector, with the thriving service industry being one of the main purchasers of high-tech machinery and equipment.
*Technology, Productivity and Job Creation: Best Policy Practices (OECD, Paris, 1998)

Leading by example

Ernest Rutherford was one of the most remarkable scientists of the twentieth century. From a humble background in New Zealand he made a string of brilliant discoveries in physics, yet somehow managed to win the Nobel Prize for Chemistry. To anyone starting a physics degree this month, or anyone underwhelmed by their degree so far, Rutherford’s wholehearted and enthusiastic approach to the subject is a superb example to follow.

Lasers, chaos, and bow-ties

Laser technology has come a long way since the 1960s. The very earliest lasers, such as ruby and helium-neon devices, were formidable contraptions. They relied on dilute active media with discrete energy levels such as gases or dopant ions scattered in a solid, external pumping mechanisms such as bulky coiled flashlamps or auxiliary gases excited by radio-frequency coils, and cumbersome external resonators consisting of highly flat and reflective mirrors.

The advent of the semiconductor laser in 1962 – developed almost simultaneously at the MIT Lincoln Laboratory, General Electric and IBM – changed all of that. The active medium, which consisted of a semiconductor p-n junction, was in this case a dense three-dimensional solid. The junction could be made from various materials, so that the band-gap energy, and hence the emission wavelength, could be tuned by altering the composition.

The pumping process was simple: a current flowing through the junction created electron-hole pairs that recombined to emit photons. Resonator mirrors were readily provided by the surface reflection associated with the high refractive index of the semiconductor material. Size plummeted, efficiency soared and the accessible wavelength range increased dramatically. It is not an exaggeration to view the invention of the semiconductor injection laser as the start of a new era of quantum electronics – one that was ultimately to broker a fair partnership between photonics and electronics.

Many important developments in semiconductor lasers followed. Double heterostructures replaced simple p-n junctions, lowering the laser threshold and increasing efficiency. Compounds of three or four semiconductors, coupled with band-gap engineering, provided an extensive palette of wavelengths. Gratings could be integrated directly with the active medium, creating distributed-feedback (DFB) lasers to complement the existing lumped-resonator lasers. The very dimensionality of the active medium was reduced; two dimensions gave birth to the quantum-well laser, while a single dimension yielded the quantum-wire laser. Even zero-dimensional devices have come to the fore in the form of quantum-dot lasers comprising just a few thousand atoms. And the vertical-cavity configuration allowed tiny lasers to be built on a single chip, providing integrated two-dimensional laser arrays.

As important as these developments were, remarkable achievements have continued to be made. In the early 1990s devices were created that did not require electron-hole recombination for stimulated emission. Instead light is generated from electron transitions in a cascade of coupled quantum wells. These quantum cascade lasers (QCLs) were constructed using an exquisitely refined form of band-gap engineering made possible by molecular-beam-epitaxy technology (for a recent update see F Capasso et al . 1997 Solid State Communications 102 231). QCLs provided strong and tunable laser action in the middle infrared region of the spectrum at room temperature, promising new and important applications.

In the new work, Claire Gmachl of Lucent and her co-workers adapted the quantum cascade laser to a tiny oblong configuration (50 X 70 µm) with a very low threshold current and excellent directionality. They achieved this by turning their attention to the two-dimensional circular resonators used in microdisk semiconductor lasers. These resonators support “whispering-gallery” modes, so-named because of the ease with which an acoustic whisper can bounce along the convex surface of a church dome or gallery. Such modes rely on total internal reflection and skim around the inside rim of the resonator with an angle of incidence that is always greater than the critical angle, preventing them from refracting out of the device. Although these lasers are among the smallest in the world, light only emerges from them via evanescence (photon tunnelling), which makes the emitted light weak and cylindrically symmetric.

What Gmachl and colleagues have done is to flatten the resonator circle to create a stadium-shaped structure. This establishes preferred location angles around the perimeter of the stadium at which strong and highly directional beams are emitted. The power emitted in these beams is up to a thousand times greater than that emitted by the circular lasers.

The team has also discovered a new type of “bow-tie” mode that emerges if the structure is flattened sufficiently. This mode is so-named because of the bow-tie shape of the four-bounce, round-trip ray path within the resonator, much the same as that followed by the rays in a classical confocal resonator (see figure). These modes are sustainable because the resonator is not circular, and so provides a range of mirror curvatures. Although the effect was demonstrated using a quantum-cascade active medium, it should also be observed in other laser media with sufficiently high refractive indices.

Why should these preferred angles emerge? We are used to thinking about laser resonators in terms of solutions to the Helmholtz equation, or rays traced according to the laws of geometrical optics. It is surprising, then, that in this case the behaviour of the resonator can be explained in terms of nonlinear dynamics. The nonlinearity resides in the dependence of a given angle of incidence on its precursor incidence and location angles. When the flattening of the resonator is minimal, phase-space studies of ray-trajectories (in which the angle of incidence is plotted against location angle) in the stadium-shaped resonator show that chaotic versions of the whispering-gallery modes emerge. For more pronounced flattening, regions of stable and regular ray motion give rise to the new bow-tie laser modes. These arise from localized reflections at four particular locations on the perimeter of the resonator – those that provide the curvature of a classical confocal resonator and that have adequate reflectance to exceed the laser threshold.

Moreover, because the Helmholtz equation describing optical fields is closely related to the Schrödinger equation, there is a formal relationship between their short-wavelength counterparts – ray optics for the Helmholtz equation and Newtonian mechanics for the Schrödinger equation. A non-separable Helmholtz equation is associated with full or partially chaotic ray dynamics, just as a non-separable Schrödinger equation is associated with chaotic classical dynamics.

Resonator physics therefore turns out to be rich, beautiful and useful. Nonlinear dynamics and optical physics have previously intersected via the laser’s active medium and pump, since nonlinearity in the laser-rate equations can give rise to chaotic time dynamics of the emitted intensity (the “green problem”). The resonator connection discussed here provides another testbed for investigating the intersection of laser physics and nonlinear dynamics.

As laser active media and pumping mechanisms have evolved in the past few decades, so too have resonator structures. The original plane-parallel mirrors that comprised one-dimensional Fabry-Pérot resonators were soon replaced by spherical mirrors to make alignment easier. Unstable resonators and two-dimensional ring-laser structures were developed for particular applications. Distributed-feedback configurations provided an alternative to lumped resonators. And now the circular cross-section of the microdisk semiconductor laser has given way to an improved stadium-shaped version.

Physics top ten

Brief History of Time : From the Big Bang to Black Holes by Stephen Hawking

The author explores the outer reaches of our knowledge of astrophysics and the nature of time and the universe, and reviews the great theories of the cosmos, from Galileo and Newton to Einstein and Poincare.

BUY THE BOOK: Amazon (US) Bookpages (UK)

Chaos : Making a New Science by James Gleick

This book brings together all the work in a new field of physics, chaos theory, an extension of classical mechanics. The author shows how computers have been able to help researchers, by mapping the whole plane of solutions of non-linear equations.

BUY THE BOOK: Amazon (US) Bookpages (UK)

Mind of God by Paul Davies

The sequel to “God and the New Physics”, this book explores the fascinating questions of modern physics such as why does maths, an abstract system of logic invented by man, prove to be so useful in understanding the laws of nature?

BUY THE BOOK: Amazon (US) Bookpages (UK)

Physics of “Star Trek” by Lawrence M Krauss

An easy-to-understand introduction to the complexities of today’s and tomorrow’s physics. The author assess what is and what is not actually possible according to the laws of physics, among all the weird and wonderful things that Kirk, Spock and Scottie got up to in their parallel universe.

BUY THE BOOK: Amazon (US) Bookpages (UK)

Schrodinger’s Kittens and the Search for Reality: The Quantum Mysteries by John Gribbin

The sequel to “In Search of Schrodinger’s Cat”, this book presents the improvements in experimental techniques that have enabled physicists to formulate and test new theories about the nature of light. The theories are described in the form of the fate of two small cats.

BUY THE BOOK: Amazon (US) Bookpages (UK)

Does God Play Dice? : New Mathematics of Chaos by Ian Stewart

This text explains how mathematics attempts to cope with chaotic behaviour in many different circumstances, for example, from gas dynamics to the stock exchange, through quantum mechanics and much else besides.

BUY THE BOOK: Amazon (US) Bookpages (UK)

Beyond Einstein : The Cosmic Quest for the Theory of the Universe by Michio Kaku and Jennifer Thompson

This text approaches scientific questions and theoretical physics with the excitement of a detective story, offering a look at the new science that may make the impossible possible.

BUY THE BOOK: Amazon (US) Bookpages (UK)

Character of Physical Law by Richard P. Feynman

Based on Feynman’s “Messenger Lectures”, given at Cornell and filmed by the BBC, this book explores the nature of the laws of physics (in particular, those of Newton, Maxwell and Einstein) and their relationship to mathematical formulation.

BUY THE BOOK: Amazon (US) Bookpages (UK)

QED : Strange Theory of Light and Matter by Richard P. Feynman

Based on a series of lectures delivered to the general public at the University of California, the author wittily explains the theory of quantum electrodynamics, the central aspect of much of modern physics.

BUY THE BOOK: Amazon (US) Bookpages (UK)

Penguin Dictionary of Physics by Valerie Pitt, (Ed.)

With over 4500 entries this cross-referenced dictionary covers sciences such as physical chemistry, astronomy, medical physics, computing and engineering. It also covers developments in physics such as quantum physics, nuclear and particle physics, solid-state physics and computer sciences.

BUY THE BOOK: Amazon (US) Bookpages (UK)

Search bookpages

Search by Title Author ISBN
Fast delivery only
Copyright © 2026 by IOP Publishing Ltd and individual contributors