Skip to main content

UK budget stresses R&D

The government is to contribute £20 million to a University Challenge Fund to help universities to exploit academic research. The Welcome Trust and the Gatsby Trust have contributed a further £20 million to the scheme, and the government hopes to raise another £10 million from other sources.

Brown also announced an extra £250 million for education in an effort to reduce skill shortages in areas such as information technology and computing. £100 million of the money will be spent on lifelong learning and the rest in schools. There will, however, be no new money for the Office of Science and Technology and, therefore, for the UK’s seven research councils.

The chancellor claims that reforms to capital gains tax and corporation tax will help companies to invest more in R&D. In addition, the treasury and the Department of Trade and Industry are conducting a wide-ranging review of the UK’s record on investment in R&D. A consultation document – Innovating for the Future: investing in R&D – describes some shocking facts about British industry: for example, less than half of all small- and medium-sized manufacturing companies employ qualified scientists and engineers, and less than half of those that do employ them in a R&D capacity. The DTI is seeking responses to the document by the end of June, prior to the publication of a white paper (policy document) on competitiveness later this year.

The consultation paper reports that the UK’s investment in R&D has declined in comparison to its competitors over the past twenty years.

UK supports radical shake up at ESA

Although ESA has undergone a cost cutting exercise over the past two years, it is still looking for new sources of revenue. Rodota hopes to open up additional sources of finance by increasing the number of commercial programmes at the agency. He has targeted three areas in particular: telecommunications, multimedia and Earth observation.

Battle also announced funding for three new initiatives in space: £6.7 million over three years for the Advanced Research in Telecommunications Systems (ARTES-3) programme; £8.1 million over two years for the European Remote Sensing (ERS-2) programme; and £6.4 million over five years to the Earth Observation Preparatory Programme (EOPP). However, the £21 million is not ‘new’ money.

Rodota also announced the findings of the Ariane-5 investigation panel. Last year the agency was embarrassed by its inability to explain a severe roll in its flagship launcher. The problem turned out to be cooling tubes inside the nozzle. The pipes caused turbulence in the exhaust, making the craft difficult to navigate.

Further details of ESA’s plans will be in a special report in the In Depth section later this month.

UK science minister praises physics

The UK government is committed to basic science, said Battle. “The ongoing comprehensive spending review gives us the opportunity to spell out our commitment to the science base, ” he added. Battle called on physicists to keep drawing a parallel between the UK and the US, where the budget request for 1999 is up 8% on this year.

Battle also highlighted the need for researchers to engage with the public. “It is vital to win public support for science programmes, ” he said. “We need to develop links between those developing new technologies and those using them.” He praised the Institute of Physics for funding initiatives in the public understanding of science.

And Battle also pointed to the need to continue strengthening the links between science and industry. “We have got to break down the barrier not only of understanding but of applying, ” he said. Battle praised the Technology Foresight exercise and mentioned the need to engage small and medium-sized businesses in the second round of Foresight, which is due to take place next year.

Tera-byte disk drives

The device works by storing the data as regions of electric charge. The charge is trapped within a thin dielectric layer coated onto a conducting platter.

The hard drive reads and writes data using field tip-emitters fabricated on the top of a silicon chip. The tip of each emitter is only 25 nanometres across, which means that large amounts of data can be stored on each platter. The chip is positioned above the platter in a similar manner to present read/write heads.

Data is written to the dielectric disk by applying a voltage to the field-tip emitter. This causes the tip to emit electrons that are trapped in the dielectric. Data is read by measuring the current induced in the emitter by the dielectric. Read/write speeds can be increased by increasing the number of tips on each chip.

RGO will close in October

The observatory employs 115 staff to provide technical support for the UK’s overseas telescopes. Some of these staff will transfer to the new Astronomical Technology Centre, which is part of the Royal Observatory, Edinburgh. Others will take up positions at the University of Cambridge and Liverpool John Moore’s University. Some staff will be made redundant.

The closure follows a decline in funding for ground-based astronomy. PPARC had earlier rejected a proposed management buy-out of the observatory, and hopes that the University of Cambridge might buy the centre have faded.

PPARC also announced that the UK will participate in a new solar science mission with Japan, Solar-B, which is due for launch in 2004. It also confirmed the UK’s participation in the general-purpose detectors, ATLAS and CMS, for the Large Hadron Collider. The collider will be built at CERN, the European particle physics laboratory, ready to start experiments in 2005.

France cuts back SPOT programme

The French space agency CNES is hoping to follow in the footsteps of NASA’s Discovery mission programme by using smaller, cheaper spacecraft instead of larger, more expensive missions.

SPOT Image, the company set up by the CNES to market satellite imagery, has been a disaster from a financial viewpoint. Although it was set up in 1982, the French government still provide most of its funds.

The company has collected over 5 million images in the past ten years. Their latest satellite – SPOT-3 – was launched last November, and will joined by SPOT-4 this year. Both craft have a resolution of 10 m. Work on SPOT-5, which will be launched in 2002 and will have a resolution of 5 m, has already started. The French government is keen to cut the costs of SPOT-5 and its successors.

SPOT would have to double its revenue before it could finance new satellite construction according to Jacques Mouysset, the chairman of CNES. Such a task could be difficult as the company faces increased competition from other companies in the Earth observation market.

Astronomers are people too

Richard Preston is best known for his best-seller on the Ebola virus: The Hot Zone. Before that, he had written a book about a group of astronomers working at the Palomar Observatory in California. This book has now been reissued in paperback in the UK.

First Light is unusual for a book about physics in that Preston has tried to reveal the human side of the scientists he writes about. Indeed sometimes, like many journalists who write books, he tries too hard. A careful description of how astronomer Juan Carrasco wakes up, shaves and heads off to work does not, in all honesty, make for exciting reading.

However, the book comes alive when Carrasco arrives at the observatory and Preston does a first-rate job in describing the frustrations experienced by the astronomers as they go about their research. And apart from a tendency to over- dramatize some sections, the book is a gripping read.

A sore point for European readers, however, is that the book presents a completely US-centric view of astronomy. That said, students will find many insights into what basic research is really like, and casual readers may well be surprised to find that – as the book shows only too well – astronomers are people too.

Did the Earth get hit by multiple impacts?

Simon Kelley of the Open University in the UK, John Spray of the University of New Brunswick, and David Rowley of the University of Chicago in the US, reached this startling conclusion while trying to calculate the precise age of the Rochechouart meteorite impact in France. Geologists have recorded over 170 impacts in the Earth’s past, but the age of the craters is very poorly understood.

Kelley and Rowley were using a laser to measure argon-39 and argon-40. “The problem with impacts is that very little material is left, ” says Kelley. “With a spot-laser dating technique, however, we can look at very small areas one tenth of a millimetre in size.”

The results of the experiment placed the formation of the crater 214 million years ago. Rowley realised that a similar crater in Canada was roughly the same age. A further search produced 5 other candidates in the same time period, with diameters varying from 9 km to 100 km. When the impact sites were marked on a computer reconstruction of what the Earth’s surface is thought to have looked like during the Triassic era, all the craters appeared at the same latitude with a variation of 75 miles.

Kelley says that the results came as a complete surprise, and that the odds of three craters of the same age creating such a formation randomly are 1 in 33 million. In their paper Kelley, Spray, and Rowley, urge other scientists to look for mass extinctions during this time period.

Three steps to better biomedical images

The technique works on any turbid medium observed with light in the wavelength range 200-1000 nm, making it suitable for a wide range of applications. Patent 5719398 describes how three simple stages create the final image.

First the observer measures the optical parameters of the object and convolutes the data with a special filter. A light distribution function is then applied to model the passage of light through the medium. A final step cleans the image of any high-frequency noise by using a low-pass filter. The main advantage of this system is that fewer light sources are required to produce high-quality images, but high-quality real-time images are unavailable with the technique at present.

Do you know your stuff?

Here I am, sitting quietly and comfortably in front of my tiny wooden desk, typing these lines on the keyboard of my laptop computer, peeping from time to time through the light linen of the curtain and the protective window-pane at the bare branches of the tree outside. I hold the book in my hand, I feel its texture, the pliancy of the page and I begin to follow the sequence of small inky signs over the white page.

With words in this style, Ivan Amato begins his book, having captivated us for the long journey through time and space that lies ahead. But what is he looking for? The title of the book sounds like an enigma or, at the very least, a provocative joke. Would you dedicate any of your precious time to read about “stuff” – the materials that the world is made of? If you are someone who knows a lot about science in general – and materials science in particular – then probably not. And yet, once you start to read the author’s descriptions of how materials were originally designed by trial and error alone, you cannot help but follow his story of how we have learned to transform natural substances into the elaborate materials that we encounter in our daily lives.

Where will you go along this journey? Having firmly established that stuff is everywhere, the author presents us with a rather subjective diagram that plots the relative importance of various materials against the time when they were first developed. But this book is not an encyclopaedia that allows you to find information that you happened to miss. No, Ivan Amato is a writer – a science writer, in fact – who knows how to attract the general reader to his work. He tells stories, lots of them, and even if you already know parts of what is described, you will certainly learn a lot more.

Let me hint at some of the author’s tales of how man has learnt to handle, transform and process matter – from prehistory to the modern age. He describes the emergence of the metallurgical and chemical industries in the 19th century, and is fascinated by the ingenuity and variety of approaches taken by those who were involved at the time. He is excited by the way in which the trial and error method has now been replaced by a more elaborate yet organized approach to developing new materials. He takes us swiftly through the golden years of the first half of the 20th century, when many great discoveries in physics and chemistry were made. He examines how large scientific projects, triggered by the Second World War, gave birth in the early 1960s to the new field – or “superdiscipline” – of materials science. Built on inputs from physics, chemistry and biology, materials science deals with the invention, development, applications and commercialization of new materials and manufacturing processes.

Then at about page 100 we are suddenly installed on a ski-jump ramp that takes us into the materials science of the last thirty years. The explosion of research in this area has been lead by our growing ability to study materials on the atomic scale, and to find out how they can be formed into specific micro-architectures. We can also understand, model and predict the structure and properties of new materials with the help of mathematics and computers. Analysis, synthesis and theory of materials are the cornerstones of this quest, as illustrated by a myriad of well told short stories in the book. The author is favourably positioned to do this, for he has met many of those who have been at the forefront of materials science since the early days. He has got to know them well and this human dimension permeates the entire text.

We move among the different tribes, prides and packs of the community. We attend the Materials Research Society’s annual conference, held each year in Boston. We see the global race that lead to the development of synthetic diamond films, formed by chemical vapour deposition from gaseous mixtures of methane and hydrogen. We read about the sophisticated multi-layer architecture of calcium carbonate “microbricks” in the abalone seashell – just one of the inspirations for those who seek to mimic nature in new polymers and biocompatible materials. We also look at the concept of “smart materials” – the idea that structural components can detect unusual constraints and react to accommodate them – which finally became fully accepted in the 1980s. In the chapter entitled “The Materials Serengeti”, we are presented with examples that range from the new molecular forms of carbon, known as fullerenes and nanotubes, to the prediction that a material built from atoms of carbon and nitrogen can be harder than diamond.

In the last two chapters, we are ready to enter the future. The author tackles the new creativity in materials science, which has replaced the old approach of designing new materials. He describes the modern technologies that have helped us to build new electronic devices, and to produce steel that is twice as strong as before. We get to know characters like Federico Capasso of Bell Labs, who has become the master of “band-gap engineering”. Capasso tamed the huge new molecular beam epitaxy chambers, which can deposit semiconductors – atomic sheet by atomic sheet – to create nanometre-thick alternating layers of gallium indium arsenide and aluminium indium arsenide. He used these superlattices to demonstrate the properties of quantum cascade lasers at room temperature that he had predicted.

Another character we meet is the American Greg Olson, who studied how to produce alloys with given mechanical properties. He realized that with even as few as six elements, there are so many possible mixtures that it would be almost impossible to explore all of their properties as a function of composition. Olson abandoned the old, empirical approach, and suggested instead that the search could be made using a new type of diagram, which relates how the material is processed to its structure and properties. This approach has been used to predict the properties of high-performance steel alloys used in bearings. I particularly enjoyed the illustration that shows how these types of diagrams are as valid for creating steel alloys as they are for designing ice-cream with the right flavour, texture, appearance and cooling sensation to satisfy a gourmet.

The message of the book is clear. The time has come to “make the stuff of your dreams”. We have the theories, the computers and the models to create a material with any property we want. But what will the social and political consequences of this new ability be? And what will be the driving forces in the future? These subjects are only briefly mentioned at the end of the book, but they would, I feel, deserve to be treated elsewhere in full. I hope that Amato – a master in turning the serious into the enjoyable – will bring his special touch to these topics.

When you close the book, you know that you will return to it. The stuff inside is a rich source of stories that can be used for both undergraduate and graduate teaching. My only criticism is that I would have preferred it if the author had travelled a little more widely. He would have discovered that materials science extends far beyond the US and that there are many fascinating stories all over the world. Nevertheless, thank you, Ivan Amato, for your very enjoyable book.

Copyright © 2026 by IOP Publishing Ltd and individual contributors