Skip to main content

World’s thinnest diffraction gratings made from graphene

A variety of ultrathin nanomechanical diffraction gratings that have been fashioned from the “wonder material” graphene have been created by an international team of researchers. The team wanted to reduce the thickness of such gratings to the ultimate physical limit – that of a single atom. The researchers say that their graphene gratings are 10 times thinner than previous beam splitters for atoms, molecules or clusters, and are even four orders of magnitude thinner than the width of a typical laser grating.

As quantum mechanics allows for a particle to simultaneously have a wave-like and particle-like nature, matter-wave interferometry is an essential way of studying the fundamental nature of such particle and making precision measurements. There are two basic types of beam splitters used in interferometry: amplitude beam splitters, which are based on photon recoil and are independent of the particle’s position, and wave-front beam splitters – actual mechanical or optical gratings that essentially slice a wavefront.

Slice and dice

Mechanical gratings, which are typically 100–200 nm thick, have been in use since the late 1980s, and these nanomechanical gratings are “universal” in that they can diffract everything from an electron and a neutron to larger molecules and clusters. An optical grating, on the other hand, would require very intense laser power at 200 nm, which would be difficult to produce continuously. So while mechanical gratings seem like the superior choice, they do have one fundamental stumbling block that crops up for more complex particles, such as large biomolecules, that are highly polarizable. Such particles are affected by certain perturbations that arise due to the presence of van der Waals forces between the particles and the grating walls. These interactions would “dephase” the interferometry, lowering the resolution of the interference pattern or not letting it form at all.

As a way of getting around this, Christian Brand, Markus Arndt and colleagues at the University of Vienna were keen to reduce the thickness of the grating slits as much as possible. “Graphene is the most natural candidate for that, and even though membranes of that material have existed for quite a while by now, no one had sculpted free-standing structures as we needed them,” says Arndt. The Vienna group teamed up with Ori Cheshnovsky and colleagues at the Tel Aviv University to fabricate a variety of free-standing 2D gratings.

The team made single-layer graphene, bilayer graphene, single-layer graphene suspended in a silicon-nitride grating and a carbonaceous biphenyl membrane. While such membranes have become increasingly accessible, Brand says that “it had been largely unexplored how to sculpt them on the nanoscale, such that they form stable free-standing masks.” Once the membranes were made and used as gratings, Arndt and colleagues used them to diffract phthalocyanine molecules – a commonly used blue-green dye that fluoresces when illuminated with a laser – and found that they could get fairly high-resolution interference patterns.

Accidental scrolls

The team, however, was in for a surprise when it studied its single-layer graphene gratings using high-resolution microscopy – it found that the membranes had spontaneously self-organized to form nanoscrolls. “The graphene nanoribbons had rolled up by themselves to look a bit like an array of papyrus rolls or hollow strings,” says Arndt, who adds that such nanoscrolls are interesting nanostructures, independent of their matter-wave experiments. “The discovery of the nanoscroll gratings was an accident, but we like it since we were surprised how high a quantum interference contrast we can get with them and how stable gratings they form,” he says. The researchers did manage to produce single-layer membranes that remained flat, by using nanoribbons that were no longer than 250 nm.

The van der Waals interaction is an electrodynamic attraction between neutral particles and neutral grating walls, and is caused by spontaneous quantum fluctuations of the charge distributions. This force attracts the molecules to the grating walls in the researchers’ experiments. While the effectively conservative force does not normally induce decoherence in matter-wave interferometry – because it does not store information about the particle’s path through the grating – it effectively narrows the slit. This has both positive and negative outcomes. The narrowing of the slit means that the particles going through have very high diffraction orders – a boon.

Uncertain interactions

However, the van der Waals force also disperses the particles over all these orders, meaning that the signal per diffraction order drops by a similar factor, and this is bad. This low signal is especially a problem when it comes to large and highly polarizable particles, because it brings into play the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. This is because the interaction with the slit can, in theory, make a slit recoil, thereby inadvertently revealing which path the particle took, immediately destroying its quantum nature. For this not to happen, the grating, in this case, needs to be sufficiently well-defined in position space, such that its momentum uncertainty is larger than any recoil imparted by the diffracted molecule. “What our experiment shows, however, is that high-contrast interference is still possible,” says Arndt. Indeed, this very same scenario was one of the topics that Bohr and Einstein discussed in their famous debates, and the researchers’ findings agree with Bohr’s reasoning.

The researchers say that these experiments are definitive because they do not see how anyone could make thinner masks, because it will be fundamentally difficult to have gratings with a smaller period than 50 nm. Current mechanical techniques do not have the resolution to go lower, Arndt says, and the van der Waals interactions “will become a very serious challenge, in particular for more polar particles, even for single layer graphene”, he says. “So the next goal must be to work on slow and cold and yet brilliant molecular beam sources, such that the de Broglie wavelength gets bigger. This is a very demanding challenge and we are investing substantial efforts into that project.”

The research is published in Nature Nanotechnology.

Neutrons fit for the future: major upgrade for ISIS facility

Discovered in 1932, neutrons have become a powerful tool to probe the structure of materials. Being electrically neutral, these unassuming subatomic particles are non-destructive and can penetrate much deeper into matter than charged particles such as electrons or electromagnetic waves such as X-rays. As such, neutrons provide complementary information to other analytical probes, and are particularly useful for detecting light atoms and for distinguishing neighbouring elements in the periodic table.

ISIS is located at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in the UK and is a world-leading neutron source for research in the physical and life sciences. The facility also produces muons, which provide a complementary probe to neutrons for studies of magnetism, superconductivity and charge transport. Using a suite of dedicated instruments, ISIS produces precisely tailored beams of neutrons and muons that tell researchers where atoms in a sample are and what they are doing, allowing new materials and even integrated devices to be designed. In terms of scientific output, ISIS underpins more than 400 publications in peer-reviewed journals every year, spanning topics from alternative fuels for transportation to new pharmaceutical compounds.

Growing demands

Since ISIS produced its first neutrons 30 years ago, the facility has grown and evolved. In 2008 a second target station (TS2) was added to meet the growing demands of the bioscience and advanced-materials communities, for example. Recently, ISIS has emerged from a six-month shutdown, during which key parts of the vacuum system were refurbished in order to meet the growing demands of users.

Unlike reactor-based neutron sources, such as the Institut Laue-Langevin in France, ISIS is an accelerator-based source – one of the first of its type. Neutron production begins with an ion source that sends negatively charged hydrogen ions to a radio-frequency (RF) quadrupole accelerator, where they are focused, grouped into bunches and accelerated. The ions are then passed through a 50 m-long linear accelerator (linac), which boosts their energy to 70 MeV. After passing through alumina foil, the negative hydrogen ions are stripped of their electrons to leave protons, which are then accelerated in bunches to 800 MeV in a 163 m-circumference synchrotron. Finally, neutrons are created via spallation by firing the high-energy protons into a tungsten target to produce a wide angular spread of neutrons. These are then channelled to various instruments surrounding the target, where different experiments are carried out by more than 1000 individual users each year. Muons are produced by passing the protons through an intermediate graphite target before they reach the tungsten target.

Vacuum technology is critical for ISIS, both for minimizing beam-scattering effects in the linac and synchrotron, and for ensuring that neutrons and muons that have bombarded a sample do not undergo any further scattering effects before they reach the detectors. There are 25 turbo pumps in the linac, with pumping speeds ranging from 300–2000 l/s. The synchrotron is pumped by 54 ion pumps, which are 400 l/s triodes. Special RF-screened and all-metal gate valves are used to minimize beam disturbance and to isolate the different parts of the vacuum system. Residual gas analysers monitor vacuum systems in the linac and also keep the gas composition in each of the two target stations in check. All this equipment is operated and monitored using control systems designed and maintained by in-house support staff. While vacuum pumps and gauges with on-board electronics are becoming increasing popular, such equipment cannot be used on parts of ISIS because of the effects of radiation.

Both the linac and synchrotron operate in the high-vacuum region, typically 5 × 10–6–10–7 mbar. In addition to minimizing beam-scattering effects, this level of vacuum allows high voltages to be applied without the danger of electrical breakdown. Indeed, were the vacuum to fail to reach the required operational levels, then ISIS would not be capable of producing any neutrons or muons at all. Stainless-steel and ceramic vacuum vessels are used in the linac and synchrotron, with aluminium or indium seals used to join the vessels together. Quick-release clamps are used to minimize radiation exposure to personnel during maintenance.

A dedicated staff of just five is needed for the running and maintenance of all ISIS vacuum equipment used in the linac, synchrotron and target stations, as well as on more than 25 instruments that are operational on the two target stations. The same team is also responsible for the manufacture of extremely delicate stripping foils used in the synchrotron and for carrying out rigorous tests of materials and equipment for vacuum compatibility prior to installation.

New magnets and vacuum pipework on ISIS Target Station 1

The ISIS vacuum system runs 24 hours a day, seven days a week and therefore regular maintenance is essential for ensuring the long-term reliability of the system. To achieve this high standard, the entire facility undergoes a scheduled six-month maintenance shutdown approximately every four years. Shorter 10–15 day shutdowns also occur every six to eight weeks of operation. The long shutdowns are not just an opportunity to carry out general maintenance on vacuum equipment such as pumps and gauges, they are also a chance for the major upgrades necessary to keep ISIS at the forefront of neutron science. Detailed planning and consultation takes place in the months prior to a long shutdown, and a full-size mock-up of part of the working area is constructed to help staff get to grips with the space constraints that they may find themselves working under.

ISIS emerged from its latest long shutdown in February, during which major changes were made to the systems that deliver the proton beam into Target Station 1 (TS1) and also to the “EC” muon instruments. Eight new quadrupole magnets, along with the vacuum beam pipe that fits in the centre of each magnet, were successfully installed. Four of these magnets lie on each side of the 7 mm-thick graphite intermediate target where muons are created. New and more reliable beam-positioning monitors were also installed to minimize beam losses that may occur during beam set-up.

Efficiency improvements

Following a detailed in-house review, the thin aluminium window that had previously separated the muon instruments from the intermediate target was also removed. This window had survived for more than 20 years on ISIS and was probably installed to protect the muon instruments from sudden pressure rises arising from either the intermediate or main targets. Its removal, in addition to further upgrades to the remaining magnets and vacuum pipework planned over the next 24 months, should result in at least a twofold increase in the overall muon flux. This will significantly reduce the time taken to acquire data from samples, allowing more experiments to be carried out in the time allocated to each user.

During the long shutdown, work also continued on the installation of two new instruments on TS2. IMAT and ZOOM were part of a suite of four new instruments funded from a £21m award from the UK government in 2011, following an initial TS2 investment of £130m. The ZOOM vacuum tank, containing a moveable detector, has a volume of almost 50 m3 and will be used for small-angle neutron-scattering experiments. IMAT, which will be used for imaging and diffraction experiments, has the longest vacuum guide section (approximately 46 m) of all instruments on ISIS. This length is needed to optimize the energy resolution of the instrument. Both instruments will undergo detailed commissioning in preparation for user experiments later in the year.

One of the biggest challenges of working on ISIS is pumping down vacuum vessels to operational levels quickly. Long pump-down times mean less beam time for users and, in the worst case, can prevent ISIS operations altogether if a problem were to occur with the vacuum systems in the linac, synchrotron or target stations. These systems were not designed to be “baked out”, which involves heating surfaces to above 100 °C to drive out water. As a result, out-gassing from water vapour can sometimes be a problem thanks to water’s tendency to stick to exposed surfaces. At the top of the ISIS vacuum group’s wish list is therefore a compact, dry, air-cooled vacuum pump that can pump at speeds of at least 100 m3/h at atmospheric pressure and can also deal effectively with large quantities of water vapour.

With more instruments to be installed on TS2 and further vacuum upgrades planned throughout the facility, planning has already started for the next major shutdown. This will ensure that ISIS continues to meet the growing demands of both academic and industrial users, and remain at the forefront of neutron and muon science for many years to come. These developments, along with expertise gained during 30 years of ISIS operation, are also proving vital for the development of new accelerator-based neutron sources, in particular the European Spallation Source under construction in Sweden, in which the UK is a key partner.

Unique, but not exceptional

It is remarkable to think that less than a century ago, humans had no concept of the enormity of the cosmic world around us. A few hundred years before that, we also had no concept of the minuscule scale of the microscopic world within us. Over a comparatively short period of time, therefore, the world as we understand it has grown tremendously in scale, both small and large. But how has this broader understanding reshaped our search for meaning and our perception of humanity’s role in the cosmos?

In The Copernicus Complex: the Quest for Our Cosmic (In)significance, author Caleb Scharf takes us on a thought-provoking journey through the history of human perspectives on the universe, as well as our modern understanding of our place in it. As its title implies, this book is an exploration of the Copernican principle, which states, roughly, that humans should not expect to find ourselves in a special place in the universe – we are not privileged observers. But in many ways, the book is also a rebellion against this idea. Having been knocked off our pedestal (where we’d been comfortable in our delusion of being the central beings in the universe), Scharf argues that we’ve taken the principle of mediocrity too far, to the extent that any hint that we’re special is seen as a hubristic violation of the Copernican dictum. Yet there are ways in which our Earth and our existence really are special, and Scharf encourages us to “find a way to see past our own mediocrity”.

These days, it is hard to imagine just what an enormous leap it was to declare that the Earth spins and moves through space, or what a shock it was to discover that the seemingly smooth Milky Way was made of stars. Much of Scharf’s book is spent explaining the amazing depth of knowledge we now have about the formation of the solar system, planets, stars, galaxies and even the very matter we are made from. Throughout this story, though, Scharf places scientific discoveries alongside developments in philosophy and the human side of scientific endeavour. His descriptions even explore occasions when human imagination has beaten science, and he smoothly juxtaposes discussions of fictional worlds such as Narnia and Star Wars with hard-core astrophysics.

The result is a book that (if I may borrow a phrase from Douglas Adams) speaks to the “fundamental interconnectedness of all things”. When describing how computers can calculate planetary trajectories around stars, for example, Scharf links the silicon in the computers to the reactions in the stars whose orbits the computers are calculating. Throughout the book, readers get a beautiful sense of the circularity of existence.

One of my favourite aspects of this book was the way Scharf explores all dimensions of our place in the universe. Most popular treatments of cosmology look up and say “Wow, look how big!” Scharf’s book does this, too; however, it also looks down through the microscope and says “Wow, look how small!” The book opens with the story of Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, the 17th-century Dutch scientist who looked through a primitive microscope at a drop of water and saw creatures living inside it. At the same time telescopes were revealing the scope of the cosmos, microscopes were revealing the surprising world of life on tiny scales, and in substances such as water that we had always assumed were devoid of life. For me, it provokes a question: When we find life on distant planets, will it be more surprising than discovering life through a microscope? Or less?

Scharf doesn’t stop after exploring the extremes of size. He also explores the extremes of time and even the extremes of life. Our significance, he argues, hinges not only on where we stand in the spectrum of life on this planet, but also on our place among the potential life that might exist somewhere else in the universe. But just how fertile is the universe exactly? Are we alone, or only one among many? And if other life exists, how different from us can it be before it ceases to be “like us”? An answer to this question would do more than anything else to reveal how (in)significant we really are.

Scharf’s book is an amazingly thorough, yet accessible, exposition of our knowledge of the formation of the universe and the evolution of everything in it. He doesn’t shirk on the detail, but it never feels like you’re being inundated with minutiae. Rather you feel as if you’re being led by the hand through the forest, discovering new trees and lush vistas at every turn in a series of “wow” moments where each step on the journey nevertheless feels like a logical consequence of the one before.

As I neared the end of the book, I worried that I would be presented with some wishy-washy conclusions or rampant extrapolations. But my concerns were unfounded. Instead, the punchline of Scharf’s exploration of our place in the cosmos reminded me of an anonymous quotation that has haunted me ever since I read it when I was a teenager: “You are absolutely unique, just like everybody else.” Or, as Scharf puts it, we are “special but not significant, unique but not exceptional”. With these phrases Scharf succinctly summarizes the intrinsic conflict between the fact that some of our circumstances are indeed special (in the sense that, had they been otherwise, life as we know could never have existed) and the fact that, according to the Copernican principle, we should expect to be generic.

Crucially, Scharf also tackles the important question of not only what we know, but what is knowable. If our species had developed under an atmosphere clogged with opaque gas, he notes, we would never have seen any stars, and it would have been much harder (though not impossible) for us to discover the nature of the universe around us. Indeed, if we had developed at another time and place in the evolution of the universe, we might have had still more fundamental limitations on our knowledge. In the distant future, the universe will have expanded so much that our descendants, if we have any, will no longer be able to see any other galaxies, and the afterglow from the Big Bang will have faded into nothingness. At that point, it will be pretty much impossible for an intelligent being to learn that it exists in an expanding universe that originated in a Big Bang. All of which makes one wonder: what questions are we neglecting to ask because our circumstances have never prompted them? This may be the ultimate limit to discovering our cosmic (in)significance.

  • 2014 Allen Lane £20.00hb 288pp

Web life: EGU Network blogs


So what is the site about?

The European Geosciences Union (EGU) is the professional body for, erm, European geoscientists, so naturally its blog network is home to a bunch of blogs about geoscience. The network began in 2012 with just three blogs: GeoSphere (general geosciences), Green Tea and Velociraptors (palaeontology) and Geology for Global Development (social and policy issues relating to geology and natural risks). Since then, it has added five others, including several with close links to physics.

Who is behind it?

Most of the bloggers in the EGU network are early-career researchers or PhD students. The author of GeoSphere, for example, is Matt Herod, a PhD candidate in isotope geochemistry at the University of Ottawa, Canada. One of the newer blogs on the network, Polluting the Internet, is written by an atmospheric scientist, Will Morgan, who is now a postdoc at the University of Manchester. Two other EGU blogs, Geology Jenga (interdisciplinary topics) and Between a Rock and a Hard Place (planetary and earth sciences), have multiple authors, all of whom are (or were until recently) PhD students in the geosciences. The exception to the rule is An Atom’s-Eye View of the Planet, which focuses on how atomic-scale behaviour helps determine the Earth’s physical and chemical properties. Its author is Simon Redfern, a professor of mineral physics at the University of Cambridge.

How often are these blogs updated?

Individually, not that often, which is why we’ve grouped them together rather than writing about each of them separately. Collectively, though, the EGU authors usually produce one or two posts a week, and the main network page pulls in the most recent posts from all eight blogs. Hence, if there are lots of areas of geoscience that tickle your fancy (or if you don’t mind scrolling past the ones that don’t), the network page is the one to add to your bookmarks. And remember, quantity isn’t everything: the network’s least-active blog, Four Degrees, has been updated less than once a month since its 2013 founding, but each post is a long, richly illustrated and copiously cited essay on an important topic in environmental science, energy or policy.

Can you give me a sample quote?

From a December 2014 post on GeoSphere about “a very near miss by the Italian justice system” regarding a group of geochemists from the University of Siena who carried out an environmental study of two military firing ranges: “One of the goals…was to determine if DU [depleted uranium munitions] had been used. On the face of it the task seems simple enough: analyse soil, plants and water for uranium and its isotopic ratio and other potential contaminants from the munitions range (of which are there many). However, the complicating factor in all of this is the fact that adjacent to the firing range is an abandoned mine site called Baccu Locci. So the real question then becomes, which is it? Mine waste or DU or other military contaminants? Their findings were that there was no contamination from DU in the region. These results met with extreme opposition from the local prosecutor who acted on the advice of a nuclear physicist from the University of Brescia who felt that geochemistry was not the proper way to investigate this problem and that the University of Siena scientists were hiding something. The geochemists were charged with two crimes in connection with their results.”

Could radon and one of its radioactive isotopes reliably predict an earthquake?

A combined analysis of the concentrations of radon and one of its radioactive isotopes called “thoron” may potentially allow for the prediction of impending earthquakes, without interference from other environmental processes, according to new work done by researchers from Korea. The team monitored the concentrations of both isotopes for about a year and observed unusually large peaks in the thoron concentration only in February 2011, preceding the Tohoku earthquake in Japan, while large radon peaks were observed in both February and the summer. Based on their analyses, the researchers suggest that the anomalous peaks observed in that month were precursory signals related to that earthquake that followed the following month.

Earthquake prediction remains the holy grail of geophysics, and an oft-proposed but highly contested method for quake forecasting revolves around the detection of abnormal quantities of certain gaseous tracers in soil and groundwater. These are believed to be released through pre-seismic stress and the micro-fracturing of rock in the period immediately before an earthquake.

Cloudy with a chance of tremors?

While a number of such precursors have been proposed – including radon, chloride and sulphate – their application to earthquake forecasting has not been realized. The problem here lies in how abnormal concentrations of these tracers can also occur through other environmental processes. For example, signals from radon (222Rn) – an easy-to-detect radioactive gas whose short half-life of 3.82 days makes it highly sensitive to short-term fluctuations – can be disrupted by meteorological phenomena and tidal forces. Radon has no stable isotopes, but has a host of radioactive isotopes including a very short-lived isotope called thoron (220Rn, half-life = 55.6 s).

In a new study, Guebuem Kim and Yong Hwa Oh of Seoul National University propose that an underground, dual-tracer analysis – using both radon and thoron – might be able to overcome these limitations. With its half-life of only 56 seconds, measured thoron activity in the stagnant air of a cave should typically be very low if the recording detector is placed sufficiently far (0.2 m) from the cave floor. “Thoron – through diffusive flows – decays away before it reaches the detector,” explains Kim. “Thus, at an optimum position, only advective flows of thoron – earthquake precursors – reach the detector.”

To test this concept, the researchers took hourly measurements of the radon and thoron concentration in the Seongryu Cave, in eastern Korea’s Seonyu Mountain, over a period of 13 months. The cave – which formed around 250 million years ago – is around 330 m long and varies from 1 to 13 metres in height. Recordings were taken in a part of the cave that is isolated from the air flow from the outside, preventing any thoron anomalies that may arise from a wind-induced surface flow along the cave floor.

Unexpected peaks

An unusually large peak in thoron concentration – above those caused by seasonal variations or daily temperature fluctuations, and unexplainable by a precipitation event – was recorded in the February of 2011, preceding the magnitude 9.0 Tohoku earthquake in Japan, 1200 km away, a month later. In contrast, radon peaks were observed not only during February but also in the preceding summer period, when atmospheric stratification is believed to better trap radon within the cave system. While the thoron measurements alone are capable of recording earthquake signals, Kim says, the anomalous peaks detected were clearer when plotted in tandem with radon activity.

The single station used in the study would not be able to localise or assess the magnitude of an impending earthquake, but the team suggest this may be done using a large network of such detectors. Though the researchers undertook their measurements in a natural limestone cave system, the principle could also be applied to man-made caverns, the researchers report, with the method not being dependant on a particular lithology of rock.

Heiko Woith, a hydrogeologist at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam in Germany who was not involved in the Korean team’s work, is sceptical about the new method. “The length of the time series is too short to judge the reliability of a precursor,” he says, cautioning that a non-tectonic origin for the thoron anomaly still cannot be ruled out. “Certainly, the radon–thoron approach is interesting to follow in future studies, but it is premature and misleading to call it a new ‘reliable earthquake precursor’ at this stage,” he concludes.

With this initial study complete, the researchers are now looking to further explore the potential of their radon–thoron technique by setting up a remote monitoring system within an artificial cave, powered by a solar panel on the surface. Ultimately, Kim suggests, these system might be deployed on a larger scale.

The research is described in Scientific Reports.

Keep it brief

By James Dacey

“Brevity is a great charm of eloquence,” said the great Roman orator Cicero. A new study published today suggests that researchers would be wise to follow Cicero’s advice when it comes to choosing a title for their next academic paper. Data scientists at the University of Warwick in the UK analysed 140,000 papers and found that those with shorter titles tend to receive more citations.

Similar studies have been carried out in the past leading to contradictory results. But Adrian Letchford and his colleagues have used two orders of magnitude more data than previous investigations, looking at the 20,000 most cited papers published each year between 2007 and 2013 in the Scopus online database. Publishing their findings in Royal Society Open Science, Letchford’s group reports that papers with shorter titles garnered more citations every year. Titles ranged from 6 to 680 characters including spaces and punctuation.

(more…)

Single photons see the light

A new trick that enables photons to interact with one another has been developed by physicists in Canada. Using an ultracold gas of rubidium atoms, the researchers have shown that a single photon can have a measurable effect on the state of a separate photon beam. They say that the result marks an important step on the road to developing quantum computers that encode information using light, rather than matter.

In many ways, photons are the ideal data carrier for quantum information systems, but, given their lack of charge, they do not interact with each other. This is a particular problem in the development of quantum computers – the logic gates used in classical or quantum computers require the entities that encode bits to interact with one another.

Photonic interplay

To get round this problem, matter could be used as an intermediary – a material’s atomic state could be altered by one photon, and that in turn would change the state of a second photon. But this effect is very weak – only since the development of the laser in 1960 has it been possible to produce high-intensity light beams that have a measurable effect on each other. Unfortunately, quantum technology requires that data be encoded in individual photons, rather than in beams.

In the latest work, Aephraim Steinberg and colleagues at the University of Toronto have shown how a single photon – a “signal” beam – fired into a gas of rubidium-85 atoms cooled down to a few micro-kelvins can alter the state of a “probe” beam that travels through the gas in the opposite direction. To do so, they tune the frequency of the probe to equal that of one of rubidium’s principal transitions. They then use a third laser to etch out a very narrow “transparency window” within the absorption line so that the probe can travel unimpeded through the gas. The job of the signal photons is then to very slightly modify the rubidium’s resonant frequency, which allows the probe photons to be momentarily absorbed and re-emitted, so changing the probe’s phase and delaying it slightly.

Clicks and shifts

While the interaction of a single photon with a beam has been studied in the past, an actual single “signal” photon was never used experimentally – it was later corrected for in calculations. While Steinberg and colleagues also do not generate true single-photon beams, they reduce the intensity of the signal to the point where it likely contains either one or zero photons, and use a detector that “clicks” only if the signal contains a photon. By continuously measuring the phase of the probe after it has crossed the gas, they can establish whether or not the clicks and phase shifts go hand in hand.

Repeating this process many times, the researchers did observe such a correspondence – they found that the single photons, on average, rotate the phase of the probe beam by about one thousandth of a degree. “This dependence arises because before we measure the signal, we have entanglement between that beam, with an uncertain photon number, and the probe beam, which thereby picked up an uncertain phase,” says Steinberg.

Going from this result to a working all-optical quantum logic gate will require much additional work, however. For one thing, the effect needs to be much bigger. According to Steinberg, a phase shift of a few degrees per single photon might be enough for a working computer. While the team’s existing technique probably won’t allow that, increasing the phase shift by upping the density of the rubidium atoms may help.

Practical considerations

Another challenge will be generating interactions between two sets of single photons, rather than an individual photon and a beam of photons. The solution there, says Steinberg, might be to use the probe beam as a “quantum bus” (used to store or transfer information between independent qubits), which can interact with multiple signal beams and thereby set up connections.

Steinberg acknowledges that physicists have long been trying to generate phase shifts of 180°. A rival technique may succeed – it involves firing pairs of photons into a cloud of rubidium atoms such that the energy of one of the photons is shared with several of the atoms, and this “Rydberg state” then changes the gas’s refractive index for the other. But he points out that, in 2006, Jeffrey Shapiro at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology calculated that such a large phase change would introduce enough noise into the photon–atom system to destroy the delicate quantum state. “It remains an open question as to whether one can exploit loopholes in his theorem,” says Steinberg.

The research is published in Nature Physics.

Inside the particle pyramid

Archaeologists believe Teotihuacan was established in 100 BC before growing to become one of the largest settlements of ancient times and home to an estimated 125,000 people. The Teotihuacanos were contemporaries of the Mayans. But while it is clear that the Teotihuacanos were aware of the Mayans, very little else is known about this mysterious civilization. One of the big mysteries surrounds the city’s leaders – who were they and where were they buried? As the ancient Egyptians enshrined their Pharaohs in pyramids, perhaps the Teotihuacano leaders are hidden within the Pyramid of the Sun.

To answer this question, archaeologists turned to a group of physicists led by Arturo Menchaca Rocha of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). Menchaca’s team has tried to peer inside the pyramid using muons – the charged elementary particles that rain down on the Earth’s surface as they are produced by cosmic rays interacting with the atmosphere. Being roughly 200 times heavier than electrons, muons are able to penetrate dense materials such as rock, but in doing so they lose their energy and their paths can be deflected. By placing a detector in a tunnel beneath the pyramid, Menchaca’s team has been searching for cavities that could be secluded chambers.

During their recent visit to Mexico, our reporters were invited to scramble along the dark tunnel beneath the pyramid to see the detector for themselves on the final day before the equipment was dismantled. Listen to the podcast to find out what they experienced and whether or not Menchaca has discovered any hidden chambers. You can also see Menchaca talking about the particle-pyramid project in this video interview recorded on the day of the visit.

This podcast was produced in conjunction with a Physics World special report on Mexico to be published in September. A free-to-read digital version of that issue will be available from the beginning of September via the Physics World app, available from the App Store and Google Play. That issue contains a feature about how Menchaca has now teamed up with geoscientists to apply a variation of this muon technique to look inside Mexico’s most famous volcano, Popocatépetl. This fiery mountain has woken up in recent years and poses a big threat to the vast urban areas of Mexico City and Puebla. The Mexican authorities are keen to have a system in place at the volcano that is capable of predicting when it is likely to erupt and how dangerous those events might be.

Joint quantum-computing venture is a first for China

The global effort to develop practical quantum computers got a boost this month with the inauguration of a dedicated laboratory in Shanghai, China. The new lab – a joint venture between the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and the Chinese online retail giant Alibaba – aims to develop a general-purpose prototype quantum computer by 2030.

The new CAS–Alibaba Quantum Computing Laboratory’s interim goals include the coherent manipulation of 30 quantum bits (qubits) by 2020, and quantum simulation with calculation speeds equivalent to those achieved by today’s fastest supercomputers by 2025. This ambitious series of five-year plans will be supported by an annual injection of $5m from Alibaba’s cloud-computing subsidiary, Aliyun, over the next 15 years.

Novel partnership

Chaoyang Lu, a member of the new lab, which is located in the centre of Shanghai, acknowledged that this goal is “extremely challenging”, citing the massive technical difficulties involved in making quantum computing a reality. Lu, who is also a quantum physicist at the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), noted that this type of partnership is new in China, calling it the first “large-scale investment in fundamental science” by a privately run business.

The lab’s director and chief scientist, Jianwei Pan, told physicsworld.com that the money from Aliyun will be earmarked for recruitment, while annual operating costs (which he estimates at a few tens of millions of US dollars) will come from government agencies, including CAS. Eventually, he said, the lab could become home to “some 100 scientists” from around the globe.

“The CAS–Alibaba Quantum Computing Laboratory will undertake frontier research on systems that appear the most promising in realizing the practical applications of quantum computing. The laboratory will combine the technical advantages of Aliyun in classical calculation algorithms, structures and cloud computing with those of CAS in quantum computing, quantum analogue computing and quantum artificial intelligence, so as to break the bottlenecks of Moore’s Law and classical computing,” says Pan.

Big data

A co-operation agreement was signed by the CAS president, Chunli Bai, and Alibaba’s chief technical officer, Jian Wang, at the lab’s official inauguration on 30 July. According to Wang, the company’s investment in advancing quantum computing and its related technologies “reflects the scale and clarity of [Alibaba’s] long-term vision to collaborate with partners in an ecosystem modelled towards the sustained development of the economy and society. New discoveries in information security and computing capacity based on quantum computing could be as significant in the future as big data technologies are today.” Managers at the new facility will report directly to Aliyun, and will also have the option to buy any intellectual property that stems from the lab’s research.

“As an Internet company, we have been paying close attention to upcoming computing technologies,” says Shuanlin Liu, the chief architect of Alibaba Infrastructure Service at Aliyun. “With CAS’s prowess in quantum physics and our strength in cloud computing, we are pretty confident that the lab’s five-year plans will work out in time.”

Mimicking the Martian surface to test space devices

Mars has become an important target for planetary exploration, in part because there are several theories that claim Martian conditions are ideal for prebiotic life. The question of whether life currently exists on Mars, or has existed in the past, is therefore of direct relevance to the origin of life on Earth – and a question that is still very much open.

Since the first successful Mars “fly-by” by NASA’s Mariner 4 mission 50 years ago, there have been more than 40 spaceflights to our planetary neighbour. Although many have ended in failure, these missions have changed our view of Mars. There are several spacecraft currently orbiting the red planet and collecting imaging and spectroscopic data in order to survey the Martian geology and radiation environment. The past decade has also seen several landers and rovers delivered safely to the surface of Mars, which has opened up the potential for further exploration. NASA’s Spirit and Opportunity rovers in particular have sent back stunning pictures of the dusty Martian landscape and collected valuable information about the planet’s potential for supporting life.

Instruments under pressure

The high price of the space missions means that it is vital that instruments perform reliably on the Martian surface. Electronic and mechanical devices that operate under the pressures and temperatures found on Earth will not necessarily work on Mars, where the atmospheric pressure is about 100 times lower and comprises 95% carbon dioxide. The low atmospheric pressure means there are very high levels of UV radiation at the Martian surface, where the temperature varies from 20 °C to –150°C depending on the latitude, season and time of day. Instruments destined for Mars must therefore be calibrated using the Martian atmospheric parameters as much as possible.

Planetary simulation chambers have become vital for optimizing the functions of onboard space instruments. At the Spanish Astrobiology Centre (CAB, CSIC-INTA) in Madrid, we have recently developed an environmental simulation chamber for testing new electromechanical devices and instruments that could be used on missions to Mars and elsewhere in space. Called MARTE, it is an advanced vacuum vessel designed to regulate surface and environment temperatures, solar radiation, total pressure and atmospheric composition.

Having these capabilities in the same experimental environment gives MARTE several advantages when compared with other chambers – the most important being versatility. MARTE has a modular design that allows its total volume and shape to be modified in order to test instrumentation and samples of different types and sizes. Its pressure ranges from 1000 mbar to 10–6 mbar, while the temperature can range between 108 K and 423 K. The device allows users to simulate solar illumination at different azimuths and UV-radiation levels, while a quadrupole mass spectrometer enables precise control of the gas composition at different pressures.

Testing conditions

A vacuum chamber

MARTE was first conceived in 2009 and took two years to build. Until now, the chamber has been used primarily to test environmental sensors onboard NASA’s Mars Curiosity rover under real working conditions. This involves calibrating the pressure sensor to provide accurate readings even when sudden pressure variations occur during Martian storms.

MARTE can also simulate dust deposition using a custom-built vibration system. Dust suspended in the Martian atmosphere is one of the most critical meteorological phenomena affecting surface instrumentation. Spacecraft and rovers that have been sent to Mars so far, including Curiosity, have been severely affected by dust accumulating on solar panels and optical instrumentation. To address this problem, we have installed a mechanical system in MARTE that simulates such conditions using dust that has the same colour, chemical composition and density as dust found on Mars. This allowed us to measure the resulting attenuation in the output of UV sensors, for instance, and to evaluate the performance of the sensors as they were operating.

With Mars missions focusing increasingly on the search for extraterrestrial life, we have teamed up with colleagues at CAB to developed the Signs Of Life Detector (SOLID). This instrument analyses soil samples to look for the presence of life based on antibody microarray technology that can detect traces of microorganisms or other biological supra-molecular structures. The detector was placed in MARTE to investigate how it would perform at typical Martian pressures and in a carbon-dioxide-rich atmosphere.

Payload-ready

Some of the parameters that have been optimized to ensure that SOLID will work in future space missions are its electronics, heat-dissipation structures and materials for vacuum that must be able to sustain extreme temperature variations. These tests have been of great relevance for understanding the behaviour of SOLID’s ultrasonic and fluidic systems, for example, and helped us identify the type of pumps and valves required. Thanks to these tests, SOLID is now at an advanced stage that makes it a competitive instrument as a payload for future life-detection missions to Mars.

MARTE will also perform tests for the Mars Environmental Dynamics Analyzer (MEDA) meteorological station, which integrates pressure, wind and humidity sensors and is one of the instruments planned for NASA’s Mars 2020 mission. The Mars 2020 rover will continue with the objective of its predecessor Curiosity to explore the Martian environment for signs of life, and MARTE is an essential platform for validating MEDA instrumentation.

Indeed, one year after its first trials, MARTE’s unique capability to simultaneously control very different atmospheric parameters and to be adapted to different set-ups is proving a crucial tool for all researchers interested in sending instrumentation to the red planet.

Copyright © 2026 by IOP Publishing Ltd and individual contributors