Skip to main content

And the hot topic this year is…

Monday-001.jpg
As close as I could get

By Hamish Johnston

Despite legging it across the convention centre, I left it a bit late to get anywhere near Hideo Hosono’s talk on “Materials and Physics in Pnictide Superconductors”. It looks like the pnictides — which burst on the scene during the last March Meeting — are a contender for this year’s hot topic.

You might recall that these materials comprise a completely new family of high-temperature superconductors. They could help physicists understand just exactly why some materials are superconducting at relatively high temperatures — something that has been a genuine mystery for over 20 years.

Of course, they might just add to the confusion by giving physicists more materials that they don’t understand.

But if the crowd at Hosono’s talk is any indication, there won’t be a lack of trying.

Physicists: is more always better?

By Hamish Johnston

Here’s a question for you: how many physicists graduate each year from US universities?

The answer is about 4000 — a number that has been steady for about 40 years, which is why the APS and the AIP want to more than double this to 10,000 per annum.

But does the nation need more physicists? To try to answer that question, there is a session at the March Meeting called “Why do we need 10,000 physics majors”.

I got a preview of the issues at a press conference with two of the speakers — Theodore Hodapp of the APS and Roman Czujko of the AIP.

Hodapp explained one beneficiary of more physicists would be high school students because more of them would be taught physics by physicists. Indeed, today American universities produce just a third of the required physics teachers — and amongst those who teach physics, just a third have physics degrees.

And according to Hodapp, the current crisis in the shortage of physicists could be solved in one stroke if every teaching college in the US graduated just one extra physicist per year.

Hodapp places some of the blame on physics departments, who for years have set curricula with a focus on getting their undergraduates into graduate school — rather than into jobs like teaching.

This, according to Czujko is changing, with physics departments trying to improve how they prepare their graduates for lives outside of academia. Indeed, he thinks they should even tailor their programmes to deal with the economic realities facing graduates — in other words recognizing that physicists that graduate in a recession may need different skills that leave in boom times.

And just to stir things up a bit, Czujko pointed out that when it comes to pay, physics graduates do fair to middling — better than biology grads, but worse than engineers. So is the market lukewarm on physicists. Indeed, if you look a bit closer it seems that physics grads get paid more than others because many of them end up doing engineering jobs — whereas biologists do not.

So, does the US need 10,000 new physicists every year?

Physicist bags Templeton prize

A physicist who performed his PhD with the Nobel-prize-winning physicist Louis de Broglie has received this year’s £1m Templeton Prize, which is awarded for “progress toward research or discoveries about spiritual realities”. Bernard d’Espagnat, a French physicist and philosopher of science, won the prize for his work on the philosophical implications of quantum mechanics by laying the theoretical groundwork for experimentally testing the violation of Bell’s inequalities.

The Templeton Prize was established in 1972 by the late philanthropist Sir John Templeton. According to the Templeton Foundation, the award is intended to encourage the concept that resources and manpower are needed to accelerate progress in spiritual discoveries. Physicists have been particularly successful in recent years: former laureates include Michael Heller (2008), John Barrow (2006), Charles Townes (2005), George Ellis (2004), John Polkinghorne (2002), Freeman Dyson (2000) and Paul Davies (1995).

Born in 1921, d’Espagnat has spent his career working on the discrepancies between quantum mechanics and the common-sense way of thinking how the world works. He studied at the Ecole Polytechnique before doing a PhD in particle physics at the Institut Henri Poincare in Paris under the supervision of de Broglie. After spending seven years as a research scientist with Enrico Fermi at the University of Chicago in the US he was appointed a senior researcher at CERN until 1959 and helped with creating the lab’s famous theoretical division.

In a tangle

When d’Espagnat returned to Paris in the 1960s he became interested in verifying the theory of quantum mechanics. In 1964, John Bell, then working at Stanford University, published a theorem that showed it could be possible to check if the picture of the world as described by quantum mechanics was correct.

Bell showed that a particular combination of measurements performed on identically prepared pairs of particles would produce a numerical bound –today called a Bell’s inequality — that is satisfied by all physical theories. He also showed, however, that this bound is violated by the predictions of quantum physics for entangled particle pairs. Bell’s inequality thus opened up the possibility of testing specific underlying assumptions of physical theories

If Bell’s inequalities were violated, by showing that measurements performed on entangled particles can apparently have an instantaneous influence on one another — then quantum mechanics would be correct. Many physicists, including Albert Einstein, thought that quantum mechanics was incorrect, or incomplete, since it violated the principle of “locality” – that an object is only influenced by its immediate surroundings.

D’Espagnat worked on ways to experimentally test Bell’s inequalities and thus provide an answer to whether the theory of quantum mechanics or the principle of locality best described nature. “We had to make the test,” Bernhard d’Espagnat told physicsworld.com, “in order to check if quantum mechanics was indeed true.”

The proof finally came in 1981 when experiments on polarised photons by fellow countryman Alain Aspect, whom d’Espagnat worked closely with, showed that Bell’s inequalities were indeed violated and thus quantum mechanics is correct.

Big spender

D’Espagnat, 87, who was born a Catholic, is also a prolific writer having penned over 20 books, including a best-selling book in France, which explained to a non-specialists the implications of Bell’s inequalities for our understating of the physical world. In 1983 the book was published in English as In Search of Reality, the Outlook of a Physicist.

With the £1m award, d’Espagnat is planning to give a third to his family, a third to charity and the rest for research. “I have not decided yet how to spend the money for research, whether I will give it to a public or private university,” says d’Espagnat.

In a statement d’Espagnat said “I feel myself deeply in accordance with the Templeton Foundation’s great, guiding idea that science does shed light [on spirituality]. In my view it does so mainly by rendering unbelievable an intellectual construction claiming to yield access to the ultimate ground of things with the sole use of the simple, somewhat trivial notions everybody has.”

Here comes the Sun

Monday.jpg
Marc Baldo shines light on phycobilisomes

By Hamish Johnston

It’s a dull morning here in Pittsburgh — and the view out the press room window is of a rusting railway viaduct, grey pavement, hills covered in leafless brown trees and a leaden sky.

However in a couple of months it will be hot and hazy here as the city basks under a Mediterranean-strength Sun. You might think this would make Pittsburgh a perfect place to deploy solar panels (at least in the summer) — but there is a problem, all that haze makes it difficult to focus sunlight onto high-performance photovoltaics.

This focussing is necessary because it is very difficult to make large-area photovoltaics from semiconductors. The materials and processing are expensive and it is tricky to make large devices without defects, which reduce their efficiency.

One solution is to simply use an optical system of lenses and/or reflectors to concentrate the light at a photovoltaic. The problem is that such systems must track the Sun precisely — which is tough to do when it is lurking in the haze.

A better way would be to take a hint from nature and capture diffuse light and then concentrate it on an efficient photovoltaic. However like most biomimicry, this is easier said than done.

This morning MIT’s Marc Baldo talked us through a number of approaches that he was taking in his lab. The most successful one, it seems, is using glass plates containing fluorescent dye. Sunlight enters the plate via the broadside and causes the dye to emit light. This light then travels along the plate to one edge, where it can enter a photovoltaic.

The advantage is that much of the light captured by the large broadside of the plate is re-emitted as light that leaves the plate via the much smaller edges — concentrating it where it can be converted to electricity by a relatively small photovoltaic.

However, Baldo and team had to cleverly engineer the energy levels in the dye to ensure that the light destined for the phovoltaic is not reabsorbed and ultimately scattered out of the plate.

This is done using a molecules called phycobilisomes — proteins that are involved in photosynthesis.

Hopefully this will allow Baldo’s devices to be a bit more like plants — not solid chunks of semiconductor — by separating the functions of light absorbtion ad charge production.

Condensed-matter town

P1000316.jpg
The Cathedral of Learning

By Hamish Johnston

This year’s APS March Meeting is in Pittsburgh — a city with a history that is intertwined with the solid-state of matter, just like the conference itself.

This is Steeltown and home to the Steelers. And even though the region’s steel industry is a shadow of what it once was, the city is full of reminders of the vast fortunes that were made from digging rock from the ground and forging it into the engines of industry.

The best place to catch a glimpse of this wealth is the neighbourhood of Oakland, home the the University of Pittsburgh’s glorious Cathedral of Learning — a gothic revival skyscraper that was built in the 1920s. Sadly, I don’t think the physics department can be found there.

Just down the road from the Cathedral is the Carnegie Museum of Natural History, which rather fittingly houses a fantastic collection of minerals. Many of these are housed in glass cases in a mirrored room — and the light reflecting from all the polished surfaces is dazzling.

I can’t think of a better place to appreciate the solid state of matter.

P1000306.jpg
Crystals in the Carnegie Museum

TEAM sees crystals smaller and clearer

Hailed as the world’s most powerful transmission electron microscope, TEAM 0.5 at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has clinched another world first – resolving matter to less than half an angstrom with high contrast. The famous microscope has been tweaked by researchers at the US Government-funded laboratory to resolve a 47 picometre spacing in a Germanium crystal.

Led by Rolf Erni, the scientists say their microscope could in theory improve resolution by a further factor of two. Researchers say that atomic-resolution tomography – a useful technique for finding defects in nano-scale devices – will be among the applications to benefit from this advance.

Transmission electron microscopes (TEMs) work by firing a beam of electrons through a specimen onto an imaging device behind. Interaction between the electrons and the specimen are magnified then focussed before being detected by a sensor. The width of the electron beam is the ultimate limitation to spatial resolution.

Berkeley’s TEAM 0.5 has an advantage over “classic” TEMs because it corrects for spherical blurring caused by “aberrations” in the lens. In 2007, the microscope grabbed headlines when it was used to resolve spacing in a Germanium crystal of less than at 0.5 angstrom. Since then, attempts to further improve the spatial resolution have focussed on further reducing the diffraction caused by lens aberrations.

Probing deeper

Taking a different approach, Rolf Erni and his colleagues turned their attention to the electron probe itself. They realized that the electron source and the geometrical source size are crucial parameters that govern the size of the electron beam. Analysis of a range of different electron sources led to the optimum set up (Phys. Rev. Lett. 102.096101).

“Simply put, TEAM 0.5 is the best transmission electron microscope in the world, representing a quantum leap forward in instrumentation,” said Alex Zetti, a physicist at Berkeley, who was not involved in this latest research.

“Resolution is also still a limitation in our ability to image the structure of amorphous materials and this is an important step forward.” said Andrew Bleloch, an electron microscope researcher at the University of Liverpool

He added, “As a frivolous illustration, if the electron wave is scaled up to light wavelengths then it would be the equivalent of a microscope resolving a human hair in Manchester from London (roughly 250km).

Better fly-fishing thanks to Formula 1

formula1.jpg
Longer casting thanks to F1

By Hamish Johnston

If you happen to be in London you might want to check out a new exhibit at the Science Museum about how Formula 1 motor racing has spun-out technologies used by furniture designers, paramedics and even fly fishing enthusiasts.

The exhibit is called Fast Forward: 20 Ways F1 is changing the world .

There’s no need to hurry because the free exhibit runs until April 5, 2010.

As for myself, I’m off to Pittsburgh tomorrow for the APS March Meeting …one week of condensed-matter physics madness, and I wouldn’t miss it for the world!

Battery charges in a hurry

Engineers at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) have created a new type of battery that could recharge in seconds rather than hours. This breakthrough could lead to a new generation of batteries for green technologies like hybrid vehicles and wind turbines, say the researchers.

The best lithium batteries on the market can squeeze a lot of electrical charge into a small volume but they are a bit sluggish at gaining and discharging that energy. This drawback can put people off buying an electric car. “They have a lot of energy, so you can drive at 55 mph for a long time, but the power is low. You can’t accelerate quickly,” said Gerbrand Ceder, one of the researchers at MIT.

Now Ceder and his colleagues have revamped a standard lithium battery by speeding up the flow of electric charge. They achieve this by applying a lithium phosphate coating to the material’s outer shell. This “simple” idea followed their recent theoretical work, which showed lithium ions travelling along the surface to be just as important as electron flow within the battery.

“The ability to charge and discharge batteries in a matter of seconds rather than hours may open up new technological applications and induce lifestyle changes,” said Ceder.

Speedy ions

Inside a battery, electricity flows via electrons and lithium ions moving towards the anode and cathode respectively. Previous attempts to improve the power of batteries have focussed on increasing the mobility of electrons. Physicists just assumed that lithium ions travel relatively slowly because of their larger size.

Then about five years ago, Ceder and his colleagues modelled a lithium iron phosphate battery and made the surprising discovery that lithium ions should actually be moving at a similar speed to the electrons. The difference is that the ions can only travel through “tunnels” accessed from the surface. The process however is very inefficient because many of ions have trouble entering these tunnels.

Having established this new theory the scientists set out to maximize access of ions to these tunnels. They designed a system, which allows lithium ions to zip quickly around the surface of the material – analogous to cars avoiding traffic by zipping around the ring road of a city. This created a more efficient system where significantly more ions enter into the tunnels

The researchers then created a small battery that could be fully charged or discharged in 20 seconds; without the coating it took 6 minutes. Reporting their findings in Nature they say there is nothing to prevent this battery being scaled up to a hybrid car battery that could be charged in 5 minutes. The only limiting factor will be the available power – 180 kW would be needed for a 15 kW h battery.

“We will now try to prove the same principle for a range of Lithium battery materials. Maybe there are some that have an even higher energy density,” Ceder told physicsworld.com.

The atlas of science

PLOSMapOfScience.jpg
The map of science (click to see full-sized image)

By Michael Banks

Do you know that when you access a research paper via a “web portal” such as Elsevier’s Science Direct your every “click” is being recorded?

Although this monitoring might at first seem a little scary and possibly unnecessary,
Johan Bollen and colleagues from Los Alamos National Laboratory have put the data to good use.

They have created a “map of science” using over a billion so-called “click-throughs” – produced when going from the web portal to the actual full text paper or the abstract on the journal’s website. The data was taken from 2007 to 2008.

After crunching the data through a so-called “clickstream model” they produced a map (see image above) with each circle representing a journal and the lines reflecting the navigation of users from one journal to another.

Maps showing the connectivity of science subjects have been made before, but they have often used citation data produced using the references in research papers. As it takes years for a new paper to generate lots of citations, the new method promises a more up-to-date map of science. This, the researchers say, can then point more quickly to emerging relationships between difference branches of science.

The researchers also created a table of the most interdisciplinary journals, produced by how many connections it has with other areas of science, which placed Science top followed by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in second place and Environmental Health Perspectives in third.

But don’t worry, as confidentiality agreements prevent any information that could show the identity of the browser being used by a third party, your privacy is protected.

Ig Nobel stars roll into town

sword.jpg
Cutting edge science

Ever levitated a frog?
No.
How about, organized an athletics contest between the fleas of a dog and the fleas of a cat?
Thought not.
Ever observed homosexual ducks commit necrophilia?
Ok, I think I need to explain…

These scientific “feats” were amongst the wacky studies presented last night on the latest stop of the Ig Nobel awards tour, in Bristol.

I went along to see if the show lives up to its claim to “first make people laugh, and then make them think”.

Jovial compere Marc Abrahams opened the proceedings telling each speaker they had “5 minutes and NOT A SECOND MORE!”

In the physics category, Sir Michael Berry of Bristol University described how he won the prize in 2000 for explaining how frogs can be levitated with magnets. “Of Flying Frogs and Levitrons” was published in the European Journal of Physics.

Surely the weirdest talk was from 2003 winner for biology Kees Moeliker who talked about homosexual ducks committing necrophilia. So the story goes… he had been sitting in his office when he heard the loud bang of a duck crashing into his window. Rushing out to see if it was ok he was shocked to witness the duck – dead, with a second, live duck, forcing itself upon the corpse. Later observations revealed both ducks to be male and the study was published in the Annual of the Natural History Museum Rotterdam.

A slightly tamer ornithological study addressed the question of “why woodpeckers don’t get headaches?” Apparently it’s because of a millisecond delay between the bird’s beak hitting the tree and its head moving forwards. I caught up with study’s presenter Julian Vincent and his wife after the show. She said he’s “always been full of ideas”.

My favourite act was Dan Meyer – a sword swallower from Tennessee. He eloquently talked us through his 2007 prize-winning paper “Sword Swallowing and Its Side Effects,” before ramming a 17 inch blade down his throat.

A scared looking young girl near the front asked the question everyone was thinking “does it hurt?” To which he replied “a little”

So did the evening make me laugh and then think afterwards?
Well, putting the ancient art of sword-swallowing to one side – I have to say that I found the whole thing a little bit “zany” for my taste.

Having said that, when I looked around the conference room, people were certainly laughing and there was plenty of scientific interest in the after show Q&A session. So perhaps it’s just me becoming an old fuddy-duddy before my time…

Copyright © 2026 by IOP Publishing Ltd and individual contributors