Skip to main content

Sociologists are too sceptical of science…

sociology 2.jpg
Science studies – blending traditional disciplines

By James Dacey

I’m a big fan of The Guardian’s Digested Read in which John Crace reviews new books by condensing them into short narratives. They’re always informative and often satirical. So borrowing his style, I’ve reviewed a new paper by the eminent sociologist Harry Collins, which looks at the changing face of “science studies” since its birth in the post war years. Hope you enjoy…

Back in the Fifties, social scientists were confident in science; in part because of the success of physicists during Second World War. My predecessors developed the naïve view that science works under democratic ideals with scientists interested in nothing but scientific truths. Socio-political realities — like the ongoing debate surrounding Eddington’s ‘clear-cut’ proof of Relativity — were simply ignored.

So hooray for the swinging Sixties! Everything from sex to ideology started to loosen up and even academics wanted in on the action. Sociologists finally realized that even science is underpinned by people power — despite what that stuffy Merton chap had said before.

Sadly though, the party was short-lived as by the late sixties / early seventies, a new scepticism was taking its grip. Terribly inconvenient eco groups were pointing out environmental damage, and after all the post war hype, society was disappointed with science and all its groupies.

At this time, a new way of thinking was sweeping through the humanities. We called it postmodernism and it passionately rejected the ontological hierarchies of modernism. Extremists proposed that all forms of knowledge are shaped equally by faith and politics. Science — previously hailed as the ultimate form of knowledge — became an obvious target and during the Seventies and Eighties we launched a series of attacks.

(more…)

Top result for Tevatron

The CDF experiment

An important missing piece of the Standard Model of particle physics has been discovered by researchers at Fermilab in the US, home to the world’s most powerful operational particle collider, the Tevatron. On Wednesday the CDF and D0 experiments independently reported unambiguous evidence that top quarks, the heaviest of the six known quark flavours, can be produced individually rather than in pairs as had been observed until now (arXiv 0903.0885v1 and arXiv 0903.0850v1 both submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.).

Because singly produced top quarks decay into final states that mimic the signature expected for the Standard Model Higgs boson — the biggest missing chunk of the 35-year-old theory — the results bode well for the Higgs search currently gathering pace at the Tevatron while CERN’s more powerful Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is being repaired. “We would not be able to claim evidence for a low-mass Higgs if we did not first observe single top quark production,” says D0 co-spokesperson Darien Wood.

No fourth generation

The top quark was discovered by CDF and D0 in 1995, completing the “three generation” structure of the Standard Model in which the up and down quarks that make up ordinary nuclear matter (with electrical charges of +2/3 and -1/3, respectively) have heavier copies: charm and strange, top and bottom. The same mysterious hierarchy exists for leptons, the lightest generation comprising the electron and the electron neutrino.

We would not be able to claim evidence for a low-mass Higgs if we did not first observe single top quark production

Darien Wood, D0 co-spokesperson

In the discovery of the top quark and subsequent measurements of its properties, the particle (weighing 180 times more than the proton) was produced in pairs along with its antimatter partner — a process that only involves the strong nuclear force. But the Standard Model predicts that tops are also produced singly via the electroweak force, for example when a proton–antiproton collision produces an excited W boson that decays into a top and a bottom quark.

While the process is rarer than pair-produced tops and mired in similar-looking background events, the rate at which single tops are produced gives a direct measurement of V_tb — one of the elements in the 3×3 Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa “mixing” matrix, which describes how quarks transform into different flavours via the weak force. Having now measured the cross section for single-top production and shown that V_tb is closer to one than to zero, the Fermilab results strongly disfavour the existence of a fourth generation of quarks.

Healthy competition

Paul de Jong, who works on the LHC’s ATLAS experiment, describes the Fermilab results as a tour de force, requiring sophisticated analysis techniques that potentially will lead to an earlier observation of the Higgs. “At the LHC we will collect a significantly larger sample of single top quarks,” he adds, “but we can only congratulate D0 and CDF for this fine piece of work.”

We can only congratulate D0 and CDF for this fine piece of work. 

Paul de Jong, member of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC

Although CDF and D0 first reported evidence for single-top production in 2007, in the past 18 months the experiments have doubled the number of proton–antiproton collisions recorded. The extra data have allowed each collaboration to achieve — based on rather different analysis techniques and with CDF using 40% more events than D0 — a statistical significance of over five standard deviations.

The CDF and D0 preprints were posted just hours apart, yet both claim first observation of single top production. “There is a constructive rivalry that improves both experiments,” says CDF member Mark Lancaster of University College London. “We happily combine our results for the Higgs searches.”

New Higgs limits based on the latest Tevatron data are expected to be presented in the coming months, potentially excluding larger regions of the Higgs mass range than the 170 GeV already excluded by Fermilab last year.

Kepler mission set for blast-off

A mission to search for planets beyond our solar system that could harbour life is set to blast off from Cape Canaveral, Florida, later today at no earlier than 22:48 local time.

The three-year Kepler mission will seek to probe 100,000 stars for Earth-sized objects. Costing $590m, the NASA craft will aim to determine what fraction of stars have an Earth-like planet around them and guide future missions in locating Earth-like twins that can be scrutinized for any signs of life.

If the launch succeeds, the craft will enter into a “trailing orbit” that will fall behind Earth by roughly 18 million km each year. From there it will stare at the same part of the sky in hopes of catching any star that “blinks” as a planet passes in front.

Largest space camera

The Kepler spacecraft has the largest camera to ever be put into space. Its CCD array has more than 94 million pixels that will monitor 105 square degrees of sky (about the size of your hand held at arm’s length).

Speaking before the launch, James Fanson, project manager of Kepler at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in California, said that Kepler would be “a major step in our quest to understand if we are alone in the universe.” If our type of planet is common, then Kepler might see hundreds of Earth-size transits, but it could also see none at all if terrestrial planets are rare.

Over 330 extrasolar planets are currently known, but most are “gas giants”. These planets have been the easiest to detect with traditional “radial velocity” techniques, which measure the wobble their gravity induces in the star. Kepler will use a different technique, which involves looking for changes in the brightness of a star as a planet crosses in front.

No atmospheric blurring

In the last few years small, dedicated ground-based telescopes have detected more than 50 transiting planets, with radii between 5 and 20 times that of Earth. The big advantages of Kepler over such instruments are that it will not be limited by atmospheric blurring and it will not suffer from daily temperature fluctuations in equipment. It will therefore be able to measure changes of as little as 10 parts per million in the brightness of stars.

Principal investigator William Borucki of NASA Ames Research Center in California compares this to seeing a tiny flea crossing a distant headlight. “What’s exciting about Kepler is that it will detect far smaller planets than we are currently able to do from the ground,” says Coel Hellier of Keele University in the UK, who is a member of the world’s largest ground-based transiting survey called SuperWASP.

Far from easy

Seeing small changes in a star’s brightness caused by a passing planet is far from easy. If someone on another planet were looking at our Sun, they would need to detect a drop of 84 parts per million in brightness to notice our planet. Even if they had this capability, they would have to wait patiently to catch the 13-hour transit that only happens once every year.

Moreover, there is only a 0.5% probability that the geometry is right for seeing an Earth transit — in other words, these outside observers must be viewing the Sun along its orbital plane.

To deal with these low odds, the Kepler mission has selected a large sample: 100,000 stars that are between 150 and 2500 light-years away from Earth in the direction of the Cygnus constellation. If every one of these stars had an Earth-sized planet, Kepler would observe at most 500 of them.

Following act

The planets of greatest interest will be those in the so-called habitable zone, where the planet has temperatures favourable for liquid water — a presumed necessity for life. To tell whether a transiting planet is orbiting in this region, astronomers will observe at least three or four transits from which they will be able to verify the planet’s period.

By including a separate estimate of the host star’s mass, they can then calculate the orbital radius using the laws of motion derived by the namesake of the mission, the astronomer Johannes Kepler in 1609.

Kepler will not be the first transit survey from space. The largest current mission is CoRoT, led by the French Space Agency (CNES) with contributions from the European Space Agency (ESA) and other nations.

Smallest exoplanet so far

Launched in 2007, CoRoT has so far detected seven transits and researchers recently announced the confirmation of the smallest extrasolar planet found so far. It is presumed to be rocky, having 1.8 times the radius and 11 times the mass of Earth.

CoRoT’s recent findings bode well for Kepler, which can detect planets over a 10 times larger range of orbital periods than CoRoT. “Kepler has a very good chance of seeing the first Earth-sized planet,” says Malcolm Fridlund, ESA’s CoRoT project scientist.

But, like all transit detections, Kepler’s observations will need to be confirmed by the radial velocity method with ground-based telescopes, such as Keck in Hawaii and the William Herschel Telescope on the Canary Islands that measure the mass of a transiting object.

Transit mimicry

Lots of things can mimic a transit. Some stars like our Sun, for example, can have spots that alter the brightness as they rotate around the surface, while many others have faint companion stars than can appear like a planet when they pass in front.

“The important thing about Kepler is that it will tell us the relative number of small, medium and large mass planets,” says Wesley Traub, chief scientist for JPL’s Exoplanet Exploration Program.

Kepler was originally planned to launch yesterday. However, NASA engineers have spent an extra day testing common hardware on the Delta II rocket, which will take the spacecraft into orbit, with that used for the Taurus XL rocket that crashed last month while taking NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory into space.

Kepler will help support potential missions in the coming decade such as NASA’s Terrestrial Planet Finder and ESA’s Darwin mission that both have their sights on directly imaging an Earth-like planet around a nearby star. “How deep will we have to look? The nearest 100 stars? The nearest 1000 stars? Kepler will help us decide by giving the frequency of Earths in our galaxy,” Fanson says.

Supernovae recorded in the Antarctic ice

In the spring of 1006, stargazers around the globe enjoyed what is thought to be the brightest supernova in recorded history, as observed from earth. Just 48 years later the drama in the heavens resumed as the Crab Nebula was born from the explosive death of another star slightly closer to home. Our knowledge of these events is based on the accounts of Chinese and Arab astronomers along with modern day observations of the supernovae remnants.

Now, a team of scientists based in Japan has discovered that a trace of these explosions has been locked away here on Earth — in the ices of Antarctica.

Yuko Motizuki at the RIKEN Nishina Center for Accelerator-based Science in Wako and her colleagues analysed an Antarctic ice core and identified spikes in the concentration of nitrate ions (NO3) corresponding to the supernovae of the 11th Century (arXiv 0902.3446).

When intense gamma ray bursts from supernovae in our galaxy interact with Earth’s atmosphere they cause an increase in the production of nitrate ions in the stratosphere. Thanks to atmospheric circulation, some of these ions make it into the Antarctic ice.

Electric swingers

Ice cores are known to be a rich source of information regarding past climates but using them to learn about astronomical phenomena has not moved beyond academic discussions until now.

Motizuki and his colleagues knew that nitrogen oxide transported through the troposphere and lower latitudes tends to precipitate in the coastal region. Therefore, to avoid a distortion in the record, the researchers studied a portion of an Antarctic ice core drilled inland in 2001 at the Fuji dome — the second highest summit of the Antarctic ice sheet.

Another potential source of distortion are the high energy protons originating from so-called “solar proton events” (SPEs). To mitigate against this effect, the researchers calculated the periodicity of these events before choosing which period to analyse. Fortunately, the period of interesting supernova activity in the 11th century coincided with a particularly quiet time for SPEs.

One final measure was to confirm that the spikes were not accompanied by any sudden changes in the water — heavy water (deuterium) ratio, which could indicate sudden violent climate changes.

Closer to home

The depth-to-age relationship of ice was determined by using past volcanic eruption signals as absolute time markers. The section of ice core under analysis — covering a 200 year period — was sandwiched between layers with high sulphate concentrations. These correspond to known volcanic eruptions like El Chichon, Mexico in AD1260.

As well as the spikes, the researchers found a modulation in the background trend of nitrogen oxide levels with a period of 10 years. They suggest that this could represent the solar cycle. Interestingly this periodicity varies from previous nitrogen oxide ice core profiles and theoretical models which report that solar variations occur on an 11-year cycle.

“Our current understanding of solar cycles is totally observation driven. This research significantly increases our understanding of the cycle by going into remote pasts when other solar indices were not available,” said Mausumi Dikpati, a solar magnetic field researcher at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Colorado.

“I was interested because it is an orthogonal approach to looking at a ‘classical’ astronomical problem,” said Ian Smail a computational cosmologist at Durham University in the UK.

Yuko Motizuki declined to comment as the paper has now been passed to a journal for publication.

Victory in Idaho!

By Hamish Johnston

It looks the the University of Idaho is not going to close its physics department after all — according to an article in the university’s student paper.

Instead of vanishing the department looks set to boost the number of undergraduate students from 28 this year to 100 in a few years time — said Wei Jiang Yeh, chair of the physics department.

You may recall that the university had placed physics on a list of departments that could be axed.

Common sense has prevailed.

NASA missions: late and expensive

Most large NASA missions have an average delay of almost a year and are launched over budget, according to a new report by official US spending watchdogs.

The Governmental Accountability Office (GAO) found that of 13 missions for which NASA provided figures, a total of 10 were delayed by, on average, 11 months and cost 13% above the original estimates. Two projects came in on schedule and under budget and one was delayed but stayed on budget.

Glorious overspend

The mission with the biggest overspend is NASA’s $347m Glory satellite, which is designed to look at aerosol and carbon levels in the atmosphere. First conceived in 2003, it will cost 53% more than originally planned and has been delayed from its June launch because of the loss of the $273m Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO), which crashed in the Pacific Ocean shortly after take-off last month.

Also hit hard has been the Mars Science Laboratory, which was recently delayed by two years and is now estimated to cost $2.3bn, up by $700m from its initial estimate of $1.6bn.

Of the 13 projects, the only two that come in on schedule and under budget are the $300m Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) and the Dawn spacecraft. WISE is set to launch in November to perform an “all-sky” survey in the 3–25 µm wavelength range and was 1% less than planned, while the $465m Dawn spacecraft was launched in 2007 — 2% below initial estimates — to visit the dwarf planet Ceres and a large asteroid.

Some missions omitted

NASA did not give the GAO data on five missions including the James Webb Space Telescope, the Hubble Space Telescope’s successor, which is expected to launch in 2013, as well as the Ares crew launch vehicle and the Orion exploration capsule, which are expected to take astronauts to the Moon.

The GAO does not make recommendations on what should be done to reverse the current trend.

A table summarizing the GAO’s findings is shown below.

CERN hold-up hurts graduate students

When staff at CERN threaded the first protons around the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) on 10 September last year, the world watched in awe at the prospect of particles being collided at unprecedented energies. But then progress stalled dramatically on 19 September when a poor connection between two superconducting magnet cables disintegrated while carrying a test current of 8.7 kA. The incident, which produced an electrical arc that breached the collider’s liquid-helium cooling system, has meant that 53 magnets have had to be repaired at a cost of about €20m.

Last month CERN announced that protons will re-enter the 27 km ring in late September — six months later than estimated immediately after the incident and two years later than advertised between 2003 and 2006. To avoid another major mishap, by September CERN will have in place a network of cables able to detect nano-ohm rises in resistance in the LHC’s superconducting cables, plus extra helium-relief valves to reduce collateral damage in the unlikely event of a similar fault.

Low-energy collisions are now planned for late October, building up to 10 TeV before the end of the year. To make up for lost time, CERN will then run the LHC straight through next winter and on into autumn 2010 — incurring an extra €8m in electricity costs (40% of the LHC’s annual bill) but putting the lab pretty much where it would have been had the LHC not broken down. By mid-2010 the LHC should have enough data to rival the Tevatron proton–antiproton collider at Fermilab in the US, which has an energy of about 2 TeV and threatens to steal some of the LHC’s thunder.

Decision time

There are a couple of guys here who are really gutted Dave Newbold, Bristol University

Among those hardest hit by the delays are final-year graduate students who were expecting to publish some of the first LHC data in their theses. “There are a couple of guys here who are really gutted,” says Dave Newbold of Bristol University in the UK.

One student in his group is James Jackson, who works on the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) detector — one of the four main experiments at the LHC. “It was massively exciting when it was going well, but then a major disappointment,” says Jackson, adding that he was fortunate to have also worked on high-performance computing and undertaken theoretical work during his PhD.

It breaks my heart that I’ll have spent four years doing a PhD with no data Catherine Wright, University of Glasgow

The UK currently has about 40 experimental particle physicists in the final year of their PhD who work on the LHC and are therefore potentially affected. They include Catherine Wright from the University of Glasgow, who works on the ATLAS experiment and turned up for a six-month stint at CERN just days before the September accident. “It breaks my heart that I’ll have spent four years doing a PhD with no data,” she says, admitting that the lure of analysing LHC data might be enough to make her stay to do postdoc research.

Radical measures

Most students can beef up other aspects of their research to compensate, for instance by improving their analysis routines and running them over simulated LHC data. As CMS spokesperson Jim Virdee points out, “several hundred students have, over the past 15 years, done their theses on CMS”. But other students, particularly those in the US where PhDs last six or seven years, face stricter data requirements that have forced them to take more radical decisions.

There is not an immediate threat of running out of funding, just the threat of being a graduate student for a decade Katy Grimm, Stony Brook University

Katy Grimm of Stony Brook University in New York, who started out on ATLAS and is currently in her fifth year, has decided to do the second half of her thesis on data from the Tevatron’s D0 experiment. “Luckily, there is not an immediate threat of running out of funding, just the threat of being a graduate student for a decade,” she says, estimating that some 10–15 students are switching from the LHC to the Tevatron.

That may turn out to be a shrewd move. The Tevatron is working like a dream and many physicists there think they have a good chance of sighting the Higgs boson in the next two years. “We have a lot of data at the Tevatron, many interesting thesis topics, and good opportunities to contribute to and learn from running experiments,” says co-spokesperson of the D0 collaboration Darien Wood.

Waiting game

But the excitement of searching for new heavy “vector bosons” that may show up early in LHC data has led Stony Brook student Regina Caputo to hang on for a year or two. Fellow ATLAS student Andree Robichaud-Veronneau, currently in her third year at the University of Geneva, is also sticking around, although she has put on hold an analysis looking for supersymmetric particles in favour of something possible with less data, involving the already known J/ψ particle.

An upside of the delay is that physicists will be in a better position to understand the LHC collision data when they start pouring in. Numerous “splash” events obtained during the September start-up, when protons struck graphite collimators and sprayed millions of muons into the detectors, have enabled their subdetectors to be sychronized, which is vital to distinguish between particles produced in successive collisions. Hundreds of millions of cosmic rays recorded so far have allowed the giant experiments to be aligned and calibrated with great precision, which has also provided some data for students.

While the LHC is a long way from its peak design performance, running through next winter should amass almost the same volume of data had it not broken down (assuming it was operated at 10 TeV then). Full-energy collisions at 14 TeV, which will roughly double the machine’s “physics reach”, will not be attempted until mid-2011. Then it will take a couple of years to crank up the proton collision rate before the machine is upgraded.

Jordan Nash of Imperial College London believes that PhD students wishing to remain in physics should not be too downcast. “I don’t belittle the predicament of graduate students,” he says, “but the LHC will run for 10–15 years and soon those students will have the opportunity to do some excellent physics.”

The measurement problem in physics

By Hamish Johnston

This morning on BBC Radio 4, the mathematician Roger Penrose, physicist Basil Hiley, and philosopher Simon Saunders had a lively discussion about the “measurement problem in physics” with broadcaster Melvyn Bragg.

You can listen to it here

I got to thinking that the growing interest in building quantum computers and other information systems has put a practical spin on the measurement problem.

The “problem” the open question of how (or even if) a measurement transforms an entity such as an electron from being a ghostly combination of quantum states to being very definitely in just one state.

Many physicists believe that the clever manipulation of such ghostly combinations could be done in quantum computers, allowing such machines to outperform conventional computers on some tasks.

Such quantum computers would rely on making the right measurements — and avoiding the wrong measurements — so what had been mostly a philosophical/mathematical debate about measurement has a growing technological relevance.

Higgs seen on canvas

higgs potrait.jpg
Peter Higgs with his portrait (credit: Callum Bennetts/Maverick Photo Agency)

By Michael Banks

As the old cliché goes, a picture is worth a thousand words. For Peter Higgs, a sighting of the Higgs boson, the sub-atomic particle he predicted over 40 years ago that is thought to give particles their intrinsic masses, would be worth more than a few words of congratulations – possibly a Nobel Prize.

But until the Large Hadron Collider starts up again later this year — or the Tevatron fails to spot the Higgs first — he will just have to make do with the picture.

A portrait of the 79-year-old physicist was unveiled on Tuesday at the University of Edinburgh showing a younger, slightly more rounded Higgs looking at the remnants of a particle collision.

The oil-painting, commissioned by the University of Edinburgh and painted by Scottish based artist Ken Currie, shows Higgs holding a pair of glasses and looking both towards the unseen artist and – as seen in the mirror behind – to the debris of colliding particles.

Speaking at the launch of the portrait at the university, Higgs said he was quite relieved the artist didn’t make him hold difficult poses for the portrait.

“It is a great surprise to me that the university wanted to paint my portrait,” Higgs said. “I would not have predicted it 30 years ago.” Indeed, he was rather busy predicting other things.

Power source from human vibrations

Tiny sensors with the ability to roam can be a great aid to doctors, returning information from some hard-to-reach locations inside the body. A problem arises, however, in powering these devices. Standard fuel cells are too large and it is very difficult to “replace the batteries” once a sensor is inside the body. Researchers in Italy are proposing a solution in which mobile electronic devices “harvest” the energy of natural vibrations inside the human body.

“Over next 5 to 10 years we will be faced with a huge number of microscale mechanisms. A big question is: how do we power them?” said Luca Gammaitoni, one of the researchers at the University of Perugia.

Gammaitoni and his colleagues have the idea to create sensors from piezoelectric materials, which generate tiny electric currents when flexed by ambient vibrations. Although the principle of converting ambient noise into useful energy is not a new idea, the researchers present a technique for “broadband” harvesting of a wide range of vibrations.

Electric swingers

To demonstrate the concept the physicists took a piezoelectric beam and subjected it to both linear and nonlinear oscillations. Reporting their findings in Phys. Rev. Lett., they claim that the nonlinear oscillators yielded 4–6 times more energy than the linear ones.

Existing methods for energy harvesting have focused on harvesting vibrations at specific resonant frequencies. However, according to Gammaitoni and his colleagues, this approach is not suitable for devices inside the human body where the majority of ambient vibrations are distributed over a wide spectrum of frequencies. So the physicists designed an experiment to determine, as a general principle, whether nonlinear oscillators allow a larger energy harvest than linear oscillators.

Included in the experimental set-up was a steel pendulum mass, the swing of which was controlled by magnets on either side of the pendulum tip. Attached to the pendulum mass was a beam of piezoelectric material that was clamped at the base and so flexed every time the pendulum swung. By varying the distance between the magnets and the steel mass, the researchers were able to facilitate both linear and nonlinear oscillations.

Scaling down

“This is a neat new approach to harvesting energy from nonlinear vibrations. However, scaling this principle down to make useful biomedical devices will be a challenge because power output scales with internal deflection — if the pendulum hasn’t got room to move very far it can’t produce much power,” said Eric Yeatman, an electronic engineering researcher at Imperial College, London.

The patent for this new technique is held by Wisepower, a spin-off company set up by Gramaitoni and his colleagues in Perugia. Wisepower will now turn its attention to the practical challenges of converting this principle into working devices, Gammaitoni told physicsworld.com.

“We are looking to develop a prototype that could pave the way for microscale applications. One of our big problems at the moment is getting the funding — Italy at this time is not a great place for development. Right now we are open to investors from across the world,” said Gammaitoni.

Copyright © 2026 by IOP Publishing Ltd and individual contributors