Skip to main content

Invisibility cloaks shield the large and visible

Two independent groups of physicists have built invisibility cloaks that can shield large objects lying on a plane. These “carpet cloaks” are far closer to the intuitive idea of an invisibility cloak than devices previously built, they argue, because they hide objects that can be seen with the naked eye and do so at visible wavelengths. The cloaks are also relatively cheap and easy to make, being constructed from the natural material calcite.

Carpet cloaks were proposed in 2008 by John Pendry of Imperial College, London as a way of extending the operating range of invisibility cloaks, which were mostly limited to microwave wavelengths. These devices are placed over an object sitting on a reflective plane and alter the path of light bouncing off the object in such a way that the light appears to have bounced straight off the plane.

However, all visible-light carpet cloaks built so far were demonstrated under a microscope, hiding objects no larger than 100 wavelengths across (about 50 μm). In addition, these cloaks were difficult to make, since they consisted of complex, artificially engineered materials. And they were not portable because the cloak, object and surrounding medium all tended to be made from a single structure.

Antistrophic breakthrough

The latest devices follow on from the work of Yu Luo of Zhejiang University in China and colleagues who realized last year that carpet cloaks can be built from homogeneous – rather than more complex inhomogeneous – materials, as long as those materials are anisotropic. Both devices in fact are built from the naturally occurring crystalline material calcite, the refractive index of which depends on the relative orientation of an incoming light wave’s polarization axis and the calcite’s optical axis.

George Barbastathis and co-workers at the Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology (SMART) in Singapore made their cloak by gluing together two pieces of calcite with differently oriented optical axes. These orientations were fixed such that light waves with a given polarization that bounce off a wedge-shaped object placed underneath the cloak emerge travelling in the same direction and at the same height that they would have done had they bounced straight off the mirror beneath the object. The wedge, having a base length, width and height of 38 mm, 10 mm and 2 mm respectively, can easily be seen with the naked eye.

Transformation optics

The team used a technique known as transformation optics to design their cloak. They calculated the optical parameters that were needed to transform the space between a small and a large triangle, such that light passing through this space would do so as if it were passing through all of the larger triangle, thereby effectively rendering the smaller triangle – the wedge – invisible. Having calculated these parameters the researchers were able to construct their cloak using conventional lens fabrication, with the cross section of the cloak being equal to the space between the two triangles, minus the top of the larger triangle.

The researchers then tested the cloak by directing a polarized laser beam so that the beam passed through a stencil, and then part of the emerging beam entered the cloak and bounced off the wedge while the remainder of the beam bounced directly off a reflective surface beneath the wedge. By detecting the different parts of the beam with a CCD camera they were able to show that the cloak worked. The team optimized the cloak so that it worked best at green wavelengths, which is where the eye is most sensitive, but showed that, some aberration aside, it also worked at red and blue wavelengths (arXiv:1012.2238).

Both the device and the experiment used to test it bear a striking resemblance to those of the second group, which includes John Pendry. This team published its research at arXiv:1012.2783 but is unable to discuss its work while the paper is being reviewed for acceptance in a scientific journal.

Fooling fish

Pendry’s group tested its device in air, while Barbastathis and team immersed their cloak and wedge in a tank of colourless laser oil. They did this in order to simulate the environment in which the device would be used – in the sea around Singapore. Light tends to have a particular polarization in water and so the device can be tuned to that polarization. According to SMART’s Baile Zhang, the cloak could be used by engineers to hide cables along the seabed or to help biologists image the behaviour of fish and other sea creatures unobtrusively.

Tomas Tyc of Masaryk University in the Czech Republic, who was not a member of either group, thinks that the papers “describe important achievements in the area of experimental cloaking.” But he maintains that a carpet cloak is quite different to a fully fledged Harry Potter-style invisibility cloak. He points out that a carpet cloak only really works when viewing an object – be it a rucksack or a sword on someone’s back, for example – side on. Otherwise the object will appear flat but still be visible.

Zhang acknowledges this. Making free-standing cloaks, he says, “is the direction we need to move in”. But doing so, he adds, will be very difficult since it will require the fabrication of materials with “extreme parameters”.

Season's greetings

By Matin Durrani

Season’s greetings to all physicsworld.com readers.

The Physics World staff are all on a well-earned Christmas break right now.

While they’ve all got a few days off, there’s plenty to keep you amused over the holiday period.

If you haven’t seen it already, don’t miss our breakthrough of the year, which went to research into antimatter, as well as our top 10 physics books from the last 12 months.

We’ve also included a selection of the most stunning pictures of 2010 as well as our favourite quirky stories that made us laugh throughout the year.

Finally, there’s our look forward to 2011, which promises so much. That’s the thing about physics – it just never ceases to amaze us.

See you all in the new year, and thanks for your dedicated interest throughout 2010.

P.S. For all materials-science lovers out there, we’ve also just posted a couple of videos from the Materials Research Society fall meeting in Boston earlier this month. There’s a vox-pop with delegates as well as as an interview with Ian Robertson, incoming head honcho at the National Science Foundation’s division of materials research.

Look ahead to 2011

This astronomy bonanza shows no sign of abating in 2011 with the launch of a whole host of new probes. Mars continues to be a popular destination with the Russian Space Agency launching its delightfully named Phobos Grunt mission in November, to bring back to Earth a piece of rock from Phobos – one of Mars’s moons. In the same month, NASA’s Mars Science Laboratory is also set to begin its journey to the red planet to perform the first-ever precision landing on Mars and study the planet’s habitability.

Also due to launch next year is NASA’s Juno mission to Jupiter, which is expected to take off in August in a quest to study the planet’s composition as well as its gravitational and magnetic fields. NASA will also launch the Earth-observing Glory satellite in November to study the planet’s atmosphere in the visible and infrared.

Elsewhere in our solar system, astronomers are eagerly anticipating the arrival in March of NASA’s Messenger craft, which is set to start orbiting around Mercury after a six and a half year journey. The craft has already completed three fly-bys, each lasting a few hours, taking images of the planet’s surface as it passes by. The craft will enter orbit around the planet to study the planet’s composition, its geological history and magnetic field for a year in much closer detail. Messenger instrument scientist Louise Prockter will be writing about the mission in the February issue of Physics World magazine.

Another Earth?

Looking beyond our own neighbourhood, the Kepler mission, launched by NASA in 2009 to discover Earth-like planets elsewhere in the cosmos, will also continue to deliver results – hunting down yet more exoplanets on top of the 350 or so the mission has already discovered. Many will be waiting for details of the 400 additional planets Kepler announced it had discovered this year but has yet to release details of. Could 2011 be the year when astronomers announce the discovery of a whole host of Earth-sized exoplanets?

Next year should also mark the final flight of the US Space Shuttle to the International Space Station. The final shuttle launch was previously intended for late 2010 but launch delays bumped the flight of Endeavour back to June. Endeavour will be no ordinary mission in another aspect too: it will be carrying the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer – a cosmic-ray detector that will be able to distinguish between a vast number of different types of cosmic-ray particle including high-energy positrons, which could be produced by collisions of dark-matter particles in the Milky Way. First results from the AMS are expected by the end of the year. Meanwhile, the US Congress will decide early in 2011 whether to fund a further shuttle launch in November, which will then mark the final shuttle flight.

Back down on Earth, the Dark Energy Survey telescope, led by the particle-physics centre Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois, is expected to come online in October. It will be the world’s largest camera for studying dark energy – the mysterious substance that is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate. The telescope has already been built and astronomers will begin moving it to Chile next year where it will use its 570 megapixel camera to survey 300 million galaxies in the southern sky to measure the speed of those galaxies.

Let’s celebrate

Of course, astronomers will not be the only ones looking forward to 2011, with a whole host of anniversaries in various other disciplines on the horizon. In particular, 2011 has been designated the International Year of Chemistry (IYC) by the United Nations and endorsed by UNESCO – its body responsible for education, science and culture. The IYC marks the 100th anniversary of Marie Curie’s Nobel Prize for Chemistry, which was awarded in 1911 for her “discovery of the elements radium and polonium”.

Under the central theme of “chemistry – our life, our future”, the IYC2011 will kick off on 27–28 January at UNESO headquarters in Paris with the opening ceremony including talks by 2009 Nobel-prize winner Ada Yonath as well as Rajendra Pachauri, director of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. As it happens, 2011 also marks the 100th anniversary of the founding of the International Association of Chemical Societies as well as the 100th anniversary of the Solvay Conferences, which were attended in their day by leading figures in science. Next year also marks 100 years since Ernest Rutherford proposed his model of the atom. Look out for the Rutherford Centennial Conference on Nuclear Physics, which will be held at the University of Manchester on in August 2011.

The other huge anniversary in 2011 is the centenary of the discovery of superconductivity – the phenomenon where the electrical resistance of a materials drops to exactly zero – by experimental physicist Heike Kamerlingh Onnes. Whilst working at the University of Leiden in the Netherlands, Onnes conducted an electrical analysis of pure metals such as mercury, tin and lead at very low temperatures and discovered the resistance of mercury went to zero at 4.2 K. Onnes won the Nobel Prize for Physics for this work in 1913.

Next year also sees the 25th anniversary of the discovery of high-temperature superconductivity in compounds containing barium, lanthanum, copper and oxygen, which has a superconducting temperature above 40 K. These materials, an explanation for which continues to confound condensed-matter physicists, were discovered in 1986 by IBM researchers Karl Müller and Johannes Bednorz, who were quickly awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1987. Be sure to not miss the superconductivity special issue of Physics World in April.

Reasons to be down

As ever, physicists would not be physicists without a good moan about funding, and budgetary constraints in many countries are sure to disappoint physicists next year. In the UK there was alarm earlier in the year that research councils’ budgets would be slashed in the efforts to reduce the country’s deficit. When the details were released in December many physicists were relieved that cuts to the Science and Technology Facilities Council – the main funding council for UK physics – were much less than feared. However, the UK government has cut the large facilities capital fund by 40%, which provides cash for large projects such as particle accelerators and university lab space. It will not be known for some years to come how much these cuts will have affected UK physics.

Researchers in the US are also concerned that their science budget could be cut now that Republicans have secured a majority in the House of Representatives. Some Republicans have issued a pledge promising to return government spending to the levels of 2008 and if that is applied to science, cuts are sure to happen. More will be known soon regarding the 2011 budget and physicists will be keeping an eye out in February when Barack Obama is due to announce the administration’s budget request for 2012.

One lab that will especially have a vested interest in that request is Fermilab, which will then know if the administration has opted to fund the Tevatron proton–antiprotron collider for another three years so that it can hunt down the Higgs boson. The Tevatron is due to stop operations by the end of 2011 and turn to constructing experiments in muon and neutrino science. However, many neutrino scientists will be furious if the Tevatron is granted extra funding of around $35m a year to continue running until 2014 because it would lead to a delay in the NOvA experiment.

New results

Back in Europe, bosses at CERN will be tucking into their Christmas dinners chuffed that the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN managed to successfully collide protons at 7 TeV as well as completing the first runs with lead ions. But first in their in-tray in the New Year will be to decide whether to continue running the LHC until the end of 2012. Currently the collider is due to close at the end of 2011 to start a year-long maintenance run, but the LHC has been pouring out new results, particularly with the recent run of colliding lead ions together. With the hunt for the Higgs boson hotting up and Fermilab possibly extending for another three years, physicists at CERN will be hoping that any extension will allow them to hone in on it next year.

Another mega facility crawling into life after years of planning is the huge National Ignition Facility in the US, which focuses the energy of 192 laser beams onto a tiny target filled with hydrogen fuel. After successfully completing tests this year, NIF will prepare to use deuterium-tritium fusion fuel by early spring next year. If this test is a success it will be a step closer to achieving “first ignition” – the moment at which the device will produce more energy from fusion than is required to start the reactions – possibly by the end of the year.

Roll on 2011!

Best of the blog

Jacko spotted in droplet, claims physicist

First it was the face of the Beatles’ legendary drummer Ringo Starr mysteriously appearing in a bouncing water droplet in late 2009. Then in early January David Fairhurst, a physicist at Nottingham Trent University in the UK, wrote to us claiming to have spotted the face of Michael Jackson in a droplet of polymer solution – the kind of substance you might find in the ink cartridges of your printer.

As the solution began to crystallize, Fairhurst noticed that a tiny droplet on the surface appeared to have a tiny human face. “I noticed it immediately and showed it to the other guys – we had a really good laugh about it,” Fairhurst told physicsworld.com. I think we will let you decide whether the droplet resembles the King of Pop.

That’s hella signatures

“Yotta” (1024), “zeta” (1021), “exa” (1018) and “peta” (1015) could now be joined by the “hella”, if a physics student from University of California, Davis, gets his way. Austin Sendek started a petition on the social-networking site Facebook early this year to establish a new, scientifically accepted prefix for 1027. Yotta, which was established in 2001, is currently the largest number enshrined in the International System of Units (SI).

“Hella” comes from Californian slang for “very” or “a lot of” and Sendek says that by accepting the term, the SI system could “not only rectify its failing prefix system but also honour the scientific progress of northern California”. Almost 64,000 people have become “fans” on its Facebook page. Sendek claims that the hella could be applied in many “crucial calculations”, including the power of the Sun (0.3 hellawatts) or the number of atoms in a large sample (6.02 hella-atoms in 120 kg of carbon-12). Suggestions by physicsworld.com readers for the prefix 1027 included the holla, hello or hilli. Could you do any better?

Spot the difference

It’s end of the year quiz time. Which of the following two titles is from a real physics paper and which is made up? “The Alpha-prime stretched horizon in the heterotic string” and “The partial solution of heterotic strings deformed by Wilson lines”. Tricky, eh? These are taken from a website called snarXiv created by David Simmons-Duffin, a PhD student in high-energy physics at Harvard University, which includes a game where you have to spot the real paper title from one that has been randomly generated by taking into account the latest trends in high-energy physics.

Depending on how well you can spot the real paper, the website ranks your score as “undergraduate”, “worse than a monkey” or, if you are good, “Nobel-prize winner”. However, Simmons-Duffin claims that snarXiv does serve some purpose, for example noting that if you are a postdoc, then you can keep reloading the webpage “until you find something to work on”. By the way, the former was the real paper.

Dad rockers riff on graphene

This year we were strangely compelled to watch this reworking of that classic-rock anthem “Cocaine” by a bunch of physicists at Georgia Tech in honour of this year’s Nobel Prize for Physics, which was awarded to Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov for their isolation of graphene – the one-atom thick sheet of carbon atoms arranged in a honeycomb lattice.

The tune – played by Mike Duffee on guitar and a smoky vocal by engineering professor Paul Neitzel – plays over what looks like a selection of Andre Geim’s PowerPoint slides. Highlights of the verses include: “If you got bad gates and need quantum states…graphene” and “Don’t forget Dirac, straight bands are a fact…graphene”. And who could forget the chorus: “She goes fast, she goes fast…graphene”.

Spirits are high for superconductivity research

A couple of pints at your local boozer this Christmas can do wonders for getting those creative juices going. But researchers in Japan went one step further by trying to grow a new type of superconductor in a series of alcoholic drinks such as red wine, beer, whisky and sh_ch_ (arXiv:1008.0666).

They began with samples of FeTe0.8S0.2, which were then put into 20 ml glass bottles containing different alcoholic beverages. The researchers found that with the sample in an ethanol-water mixture, only about 10% of the material was superconducting below 6 K.

But when it was dunked into alcoholic drinks, the superconducting fraction of the sample increased. Red wine was found to work best, with 63% of the sample exhibiting superconductivity as well as giving a small increase in the superconducting temperature of 7.8 K. Why this happens is unclear, but the bigger question is where the scientists got the idea for this research in the first place.

It’s all relative

 

Say hello to Einstein, the world’s smallest horse. He is a pinto stallion, born in March weighing just 2.7 kg, and is only 35 cm tall. So why is a small horse named after the world’s most famous physicist? “We thought the name was befitting of him because he had such a huge head for such a little foal,” Einstein’s owners Charlie Cantrell and Rachel Wagner from New Hampshire, US, told physicsworld.com.

They also named the horse Einstein because they felt it would be a reminder of two things. The first was that “one has to be intelligent when purchasing a miniature horse [as] they require a massive amount of specialized care”. The second was that “Einstein believed in compassion for all living creatures. He was an advocate of humane treatment of animals.” Hmm.

Encryption kicks off in the quantum stadium

 

You might not think that football and quantum cryptography have much in common. But both were combined at this year’s FIFA World Cup at the Moses Mabhida Stadium in Durban, where one of the competition’s semi-finals took place on 7 July.

The eThekwini Municipality in Durban has teamed up with the Centre for Quantum Technology at the University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN) to install a quantum-cryptography-secured telecoms link between the football stadium and the FIFA 2010 World Cup Joint Operation Centre in Durban.

According to UKZN physicist Abdul Mizra, the system was used to ensure the secure transmission of voice and data, including e-mail, during the World Cup. What FIFA boss Sepp Blatter had to say that is so secret remains a mystery.

Brazilian wundergoal revisited

 

Still on football, many consider the goal scored from a free kick by Brazilian fullback Roberto Carlos against France in 1997 to be one of the best ever. When the São Paulo-born defender struck the ball about 35 m from the French goal, it was initially heading so far wide that it made a ball boy, who was standing a few metres to the right of the goal, duck. But at the last moment the ball curved strongly to the left and just snuck into the net.

Theories for this effect range from the material of the ball, the unusually dry conditions on the night to even a gust of wind. Thirteen years on, Guillaume Dupeux and colleagues at the Ecole Polytechnique in Palaiseau, France, can finally explain the physics behind the curve (New J. Phys. 12 093004).

By firing and tracking tiny polymer spheres through water, the researchers witnessed a “spinning-ball spiral” effect where the friction exerted on a ball by its surroundings slows it down enough for the spin to take over in directing the ball’s trajectory and sending it into the goal. The research has been a big hit, with the paper downloaded 10,790 times within two days of being published. And the institution that downloaded the paper the most? Yep, you guessed it: São Paulo University.

Kenyan physics graduate builds aircraft via Wikipedia

 

After studying physics at the University of Nairobi and then moving into the computer-hardware business, Gabriel Nderitu, 42, cobbled together a two-seater aircraft this year after reading about the principles of aeronautics from that most trusted information source – Wikipedia.

Nderitu – Kenya’s answer to the Wright brothers – began constructing his craft last year and it has so far cost about $8000. Weighing in at 800 kg and built around the engine of a Toyota NZE car, the craft’s wings are made from sheets of aluminium and attached to its nose is a 188 cm propeller operating at 4000 rotations per minute.

He downloaded roughly 5 GB of data to design the craft, with Wikipedia serving as the main source of information. However, the project has attracted the attention of the Kenyan Civil Aviation Authority, which has advised Nderitu to stop working on his plane and seemingly missed the more uplifting side to the story.

By ‘eck! Particle physicist to (apparently) star in soap opera

 

And lastly, a story that did not quite happen. Although the article appeared on 1 April, it did, however, still take quite a few of our readers by surprise. We reported that Brian Cox, the University of Manchester particle physicist and a researcher at CERN in Geneva, was set to appear on Coronation Street – the longest-running British TV soap opera.

The show, known affectionately as Corrie, is set in the fictional town of Weatherfield, a suburb of Manchester, and follows a number of dysfunctional families living on the street with the Rovers Return pub as its main social point. Cox, who was born in Oldham, Greater Manchester, will be no stranger to the show or indeed the dialect, which can feature terms such as “eh, chuck?”, “nowt” and “by ‘eck!”

The Mancunian physicist was expected to play the character Byron Knox, a particle physicist who works at Weatherfield Polytechnic. Although details about the storyline for Cox’s character were scarce, physicsworld.com learnt that Knox used to work at CERN but returns to Weatherfield after being sacked for accidentally dropping his meat and potato pie onto an electrical connection at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider – stopping the experiment from working. His appearance on the show, alas, never took place, but that doesn’t mean it won’t happen next year!

You can be sure of more quirky stories from the world of physics next year. See you in 2011!

Funding the frontiers of materials science

When it comes to funding dollars, the National Science Foundation’s Division of Materials Research (DMR) is one of America’s most important backers of materials science.

Next year, this government agency will allocate close to $320 million on a wide-ranging programme of advanced materials research and technology innovation.

In this exclusive physicsworld.com video interview, Ian Robertson, the DMR’s incoming director, talks about growth areas – nanoelectronics, photovoltaics and data-enabled science among others – and what the agency is doing to encourage high-risk, high-payoff interdisciplinary research.

As for the “next big thing”, Robertson doesn’t have a crystal ball, but he does predict a pivotal role for computational materials science and simulation in areas like synthesis, processing and the modelling of next-generation materials.

“My feeling is that it is not going to impact one area of materials science, but the entire field,” says Robertson, who is also a Donald B Willett professor of engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

This interview forms part of a series filmed at the Materials Research Society (MRS) Fall Meeting in Boston. See also “Living in a material world”.

Our favourite pictures of 2010

No, that’s not a Frisbee balancing on a stalagmite – it’s an electron microscope image of the first all-optical transistor on a silicon chip. (Courtesy: EPFL.)

It could be a Hermes scarf, but it’s a photograph of topological defects created when a particle is placed in a liquid crystal. (Courtesy: Oleg Lavrentovich, Israel Lazo and Oleg Pishnyak.)

NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has been sweeping around the Moon for over a year and has delivered many spectacular pictures – including this one of the far side of the Moon. (Courtesy: NASA.)

This one made us laugh. On the left is an artist’s impression of a four-legged molecular motor, which walks much like a horse (right). (Courtesy: Ludwig Bartels.)

Why does Leonardo’s famous portrait of Mona Lisa have such natural grace? The answer could come from this X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy study at the Louvre. (Courtesy: Walter Philippe.)

This is our best view yet of “the face of God”, taken by ESA’s Planck space mission. What will this all-sky survey of the cosmic microwave background reveal about the origin of the universe? (Courtesy: ESA.)

Making a model of the Matterhorn just 25 nm tall must rank among the oddest of follies. But that’s just what Armin Knoll and colleagues at IBM in Switzerland and the US did using their new scanning probe lithography technique. (Courtesy: IBM Research, Zurich.)

Fantastic flares and eerie light from streams of electrons are just some of the stunning scenes of the Sun captured in high resolution by NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), which was launched in February. (Courtesy: NASA.)

Magnetohydrodynamics may be a mouthful, but it does create stunning computer visualizations. These were made by Akira Kageyama and colleagues at the Earth Simulator supercomputer in Japan and show how molten iron could flow deep within our planet’s interior to generate the Earth’s magnetic field.

This scanning tunnelling microscope image is the first ever fractal pattern spotted in a quantum system. It was taken by Ali Yazdani and team at Princeton University in the US, who say that the fractal emerges when the doped gallium arsenide sample makes the transition from metal to insulator. (Courtesy: Yazdani Group, Princeton University.)

This year’s Nobel Prize for Physics went to Andre Geim (left) and Kostya Novoselov of the University of Manchester. We loved this serene shot of the two graphene gurus sitting outside on a lovely autumn day – the calm before the storm of fame struck. (Courtesy: University of Manchester.)

Oops! There goes the neighbourhood. This amazing 60 m “sinkhole” suddenly appeared this year in Guatemala City. Geophysicists say that such collapses can occur when liquids flow into an underground cavity causing it to corrode into a network of chambers that can no longer support the overlying rock and soil. (Courtesy: Guatemalan Government.)

Do these concentric circles offer a glimpse of before the Big Bang? Roger Penrose and Vahe Gurzadyn came to this conclusion after studying images of the cosmic microwave background radiation. However, other physicists are not convinced. (Courtesy: Penrose and Gurzadyn.)

The oceans are full of tiny organisms like this alga. Their constant swimming plays an important, yet poorly understood, role in the transport of heat and nutrients. The colours and contours show how water flows past the moving alga. (Courtesy: K Drescher and colleagues, University of Cambridge.)

Remember that scene in Star Wars when a hologram of Princess Leia pops out of R2D2? Now, Nasser Peyghambarian and colleagues at the University of Arizona and Nitto Denko Technical Corporation have taken an important step towards creating such an animation. This is their version of an F-4 Phantom Jet. (Courtesy: gargaszphotos.com/University of Arizona.)

Living in a material world

The Materials Research Society (MRS) Fall Meeting has become a reference point for the increasingly cross-disciplinary mix of scientists and engineers that make up the materials-science community. In the first of our series of exclusive video reports from the conference, which was held in Boston earlier this month, delegates give their take from the cutting edge of materials science and technology.

Red Moon of Ontario

john moon1.jpg


By Hamish Johnston

john moon2.jpg

My old friend John Shymko has posted some lovely photos of a very red eclipsed Moon that he took early this morning in southern Ontario.

The Earth is blocking direct sunlight from reaching the Moon, which is instead illuminated by sunlight that has scattered through the Earth’s atmosphere. This is what gives the Moon its lovely red colour.

Indeed, consulting NASA’s entry on the Danjon scale I’d say that John’s Moon scores full marks at L=4. This means that John saw a full umbral eclipse.

Top 10 books for 2010

10. The Tunguska Mystery by Vladimir Rubtsov (Springer)
Some obscure, little-publicized books deserve to remain so. This isn’t one of them. True, the book’s subject matter – a massive explosion that flattened 2100 km2 of Siberian forest over a century ago – is admittedly a little arcane, but in weaving together history, science and personal narrative, Vladimir Rubtsov makes a compelling case for why the Tunguska event deserves more attention beyond the borders of the old Soviet Union.

9. Coming Climate Crisis? Consider the Past, Beware the Big Fix by Claire L Parkinson (Rowman & Littlefield)
I seldom disagree with Physics World‘s reviewers, but in this case, I did. Reviewer Alan Robock objected to the fact that, although Claire Parkinson is not a climate sceptic herself, and her book discusses many flaws in sceptics’ arguments, she nevertheless treats those arguments seriously. Having read my share of ranting discussion-board posts, I admit that Robock had a point when he wrote that “when ‘sceptical’ scientists misrepresent the science on purpose…they should be condemned – not have their specious arguments accepted uncritically”. However, I also think that insults are unlikely to change minds, and that too many books about climate change (on both sides) are “preaching to the choir”. If we want a better-quality debate, Parkinson’s approach seems closer to the mark.

8. How It Ends by Chris Impey (W W Norton)
Rather than looking back to the Big Bang and trying to describe how life, the universe and everything began, Chris Impey chose to tackle the just-as-intriguing question of what happens when it ends. Impey defines “it” as everything from life on Earth (human and otherwise) to the solar system, the galaxy and the universe itself. According to our reviewer, Cormac O’Raifeartaigh, the result is a varied and surprisingly cheerful proof that “every good story needs an ending”.

7. Lake Views: This World and the Universe by Steven Weinberg (Harvard University Press)
A new book of essays from Steven Weinberg is always welcome, and our reviewer, John Ellis, was fulsome in his praise of this one. The subject matter in these essays ranges from science and philosophy to defence policy and religion. According to Ellis, each essay “dissects one of these subjects with the same logic, clarity and single-mindedness that his colleagues appreciate in Weinberg’s research papers”. If more of us could view such subjects with Weinberg’s cool rationality, Ellis adds, “our world and our public discourse would be the better for it”.

6. The Quants: How a New Breed of Math Whizzes Conquered Wall Street and Nearly Destroyed It by Scott Patterson (Crown Business)
After observing that he has “always been surprised that scientists in academia are not more curious about the lives of their former peers working in the ‘real world'”, Physics World reviewer Steve Hsu went on to recommend that anyone willing to buck the trend should read this pacy description of the “increasingly mathematical and technological world of high finance, and the many physicists, mathematicians and engineers who inhabit it”. Just don’t get too jealous of their high-flying lifestyles.

5. Newton and the Counterfeiter by Thomas Levenson (Faber and Faber)
We at Physics World have always argued that people with a physics background can turn their hands to a wide variety of careers. As it turns out, the financial physicists who feature in our number 6 book can claim an illustrious predecessor: at the age of 53, no less a physicist than Isaac Newton traded academic life at Cambridge for the chance to “wade hip deep into London’s underworld” as warden of the Royal Mint. Thomas Levenson’s account of this part of Isaac Newton’s career makes for compelling reading, and offers fresh insights into one of physics’ best-known figures.

4. Packing for Mars by Mary Roach (One World Publications/ W W Norton)
Ever wanted to become an astronaut? Ever considered that boldly going where few have gone before will require sacrificing a lot of privacy, accepting a lot of hazards, and spending months in a space capsule that reeks of your fellow astronauts’ farts? Roach’s eye-opening account of the smelly, uncomfortable and just plain weird side of space exploration is equal parts fascinating and hilarious. Yet even when she’s asking a Russian cosmonaut about space-borne sex substitutes, her respect for the human beings willing to take the gross with the glorious is evident. As she writes in the introduction, “Space doesn’t just encompass the sublime and the ridiculous. It erases the line between.”

3, 2, 1…
In 2009 picking the year’s top book was easy: Graham Farmelo’s biography of Paul Dirac, The Strangest Man, stood head-and-shoulders above the rest, and won a Costa “Best Biography” gong to prove it. The competition for 2010 was tighter, with a cluster of books vying for the honour, and it was hard to decide between them. So with that caveat, here come the top three…

3. Massive: The Hunt for the God Particle by Ian Sample (Virgin Books/Basic Books)
A lot of ink has been spilled about the Higgs boson in the past few years, and the fact that we haven’t discovered the damn thing yet doesn’t seem to stem the tide one bit. But if you read just one popular-science book about the ubiquitous/elusive particle this year, let it be this one. (If you read two, pick up Gian Francesco Giudice’s The Zeptospace Odyssey as well – it fell just outside this list.) According to our reviewer Andy Parker, Ian Sample’s account “could be the screenplay” for a Hollywood film about Higgs-hunting. Yet Sample is also careful with the science, giving credit to physicists other than Peter Higgs and avoiding the lazy assumption that particle physics begins and ends with the boson that bears his name. So if you want to explain to a non-scientist what all the fuss is about, says Parker, “buy them this book, and get a copy for yourself”.

2. How to Teach Quantum Physics to Your Dog by Chad Orzel (One World Publications/Scribner)
Richard Feynman once said that if you cannot explain something to a first-year undergraduate, you haven’t really understood it. The author of our number two book, Chad Orzel, pushes Feynman’s principle to its logical conclusion – and beyond – by attempting to explain quantum physics to Emmy, his dog. It’s a cute idea, and it works for several reasons. One is that Orzel’s explanations are unusually clear and concrete, and they incorporate graphs, diagrams and simple equations in a way that aids understanding, rather than hindering it. Another reason is that he draws many of his examples not from quantum mechanics’ 1920s “golden age”, but from modern experiments performed by living scientists. This is astonishingly (and sadly) uncommon for a quantum-physics book aimed at a popular audience. And finally, there’s Emmy. A talking dog will not be every reader’s cup of tea, but Emmy’s naïve-yet-revealing questions do allow Orzel to correct misconceptions and try out different explanations without appearing to talk down to the reader. Give the dog (and her owner) a biscuit, and give this book a try.

1. The Edge of Physics: Dispatches from the Frontiers of Cosmology by Anil Ananthaswamy (Duckworth/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt)
With big unanswered questions about dark matter and dark energy dominating current research, these are exciting times for cosmology. Yet writers who want to communicate that excitement have a problem: once they’ve stated the mind-blowing fact that 96% of the universe’s mass is a near-complete mystery to us, what do they do for an encore? Ananthaswamy’s ingenious solution was to focus on cosmology’s practical side, by taking a continent-hopping tour of experiments that aim to detect cosmological mysteries like neutrinos and dark matter. The result is a book that hovers between popular physics and travelogue, as Ananthaswamy, a consultant editor of New Scientist, writes with equal eloquence about the ethereal science of neutrinos and the (literally) cold practicalities of studying them in places like Antarctica and Siberia. He’s got a good eye for detail, too, speckling his account with the sort of anecdotes – like finding 18th-century lead for dark-matter detector shields or retrieving a string of photomultiplier tubes from the bottom of the world’s deepest lake – that bring research to life. It’s a fine story, told in an innovative and exciting way – and it’s our book of the year for 2010.

Happy holiday reading!

Physics World reveals its top 10 breakthroughs for 2010

The ALPHA collaboration announced its findings in late November, which involved trapping 38 antihydrogen atoms (an antielectron orbiting an antiproton) for about 170 ms. This is long enough to measure their spectroscopic properties in detail, which the team hopes to do in 2011.

Just weeks later, the ASACUSA group at CERN announced that it had made a major breakthrough towards creating a beam of antihydrogen that is suitable for spectroscopic studies. Our congratulations to both teams.

We have also awarded nine runners-up mentions (see below) – with second place going to the first direct detection of the spectrum of an exoplanet and third place to the observation of quantum behaviour in an object big enough to be seen with the naked eye.

1st place: Antihydrogen success

The antihydrogen breakthroughs scooped our first prize because it ought now be possible to carry out the first detailed studies of the energy levels in antihydrogen. Any slight differences in the levels compared to ordinary hydrogen could shed light on one of the biggest mysteries in physics – why there is so much more matter than antimatter in the universe.

The ALPHA group is represented by Jeffrey Hangst of Aarhus University in Denmark, who told physicsworld.com that the holy grail of antihydrogen studies is measuring the energy of the 1 s to 2 s atomic transitions. This transition in the far-ultraviolet has been measured in hydrogen to an accuracy of two parts in 1014, and making similar measurements on antihydrogen could reveal a violation of charge-parity-time reversal (CPT) symmetry. The discovery of such a violation could also help physicists understand why there is much more matter than antimatter in the universe.

One challenge facing the ALPHA team is accumulating enough antihydrogen to make accurate measurements – however, Hangst said that the team has already trapped “a lot” more than the 38 reported in November. Hangst says that the most difficult part of the five-year ALPHA project has been “learning how to make antihydrogen cold enough to trap”, because it is extremely difficult to make spectroscopic studies on beams.

In December, however, the ASACUSA team announced its ability to create a focused beam of antihydrogen that the researchers believe is suitable for making spectroscopic measurements at microwave energies. This should allow them to look at the hyperfine structure of antihydrogen energy levels and compare them to hydrogen – which could provide evidence of CPT violation.

ASACUSA team leader Yasunori Yamazaki of the RIKEN laboratory in Japan told physicsworld.com that its next step is to make their “antihydrogen beam from a strong non-uniform magnetic field region where it is produced and into a microwave cavity for analyses in a magnetic-field-free region to realize high-precision spectroscopy”. He adds that the physicists are “an inch away” from extracting the beam and “several inches away” from making spectroscopic measurements. “I hope we can start to work on the spectroscopy next year after the confirmation of an antihydrogen beam,” he says.

Perhaps the most exciting aspect of both projects is that there is no definitive theoretical prediction of how (or indeed if) CPT-violation will occur in the hydrogen-antihydrogen system. The antihydrogen experiments will begin again at CERN in May, so look forward to exciting results – and perhaps a few surprises from both groups.

2nd place: Exoplanet atmosphere laid bare

Second place in our list of top breakthroughs for 2010 goes to a team of astronomers in Canada and Germany who have made the first direct measurement of the atmospheric spectrum of a planet outside our solar system. Markus Janson of the University of Toronto and colleagues used the European Southern Observatory (ESO) Very Large Telescope (VLT) to study the atmosphere of the exoplanet HR 8799, which is 130 light-years from Earth. Although this particular exoplanet shows no signs of life, the ability to make such measurements is an important step forward in the search for life elsewhere in the universe.

3rd place: Quantum effects seen in a visible object

In what is an important step towards testing Schrödinger’s cat paradox, physicists at the University of California, Santa Barbara have bagged third place in our top 10 by observing true quantum behaviour in a macroscopic object big enough to be seen with the naked eye. Andrew Cleland and crew reduced the amplitude of the vibrations in a resonator by cooling it down to below 0.1 K. They were then able to create a superposition state of the resonator where they simultaneously had an excitation in the resonator and no excitation in the resonator. “This is analogous to Schrödinger’s cat being dead and alive at the same time,” says Cleland. This is the first time this feat has been achieved and it could shed light on the mysterious boundaries between the classical and quantum worlds.

4th place: Visible-light cloaking of large objects

Fourth place on our list is a last-minute entry and goes to two independent teams of physicists who have just published preprints claiming to have built the first invisibility cloaks that can hide large objects from visible light. Now George Barbastathis and colleagues at the Massachussets Institute of Technology and the University of Singapore report the cloaking of 2D millimeter-sized objects. Meanwhile Shuang Zhang and team at the University of Birmingham, Imperial College and the Technical University of Denmark have managed to cloak millimeter-sized 3D objects from prying eyes. Unlike most other cloaks that use artificial metamaterials, both cloaks use natural calcite crystals.

5th place: Hail the first sound lasers

Two independent groups of physicists have been jointly awarded fifth place after they unveiled the first phonon “lasers”. These emit coherent sound waves in much the same way as lasers emit coherent light waves. One team was led by Tony Kent at the University of Nottingham in the UK and the other by Ivan Grudinin at Caltech. One of the devices emits sound at about 400 GHz while the other operates in the megahertz range. As sound penetrates most materials, the lasers could be used to obtain 3D images of tiny nanostructures.

6th place: A Bose–Einstein condensate from light

Many physicists believed it could not be done, but now a team in Germany has created a Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) from photons, earning them the sixth slot. BECs are formed when identical bosons – particles with integer spin – are cooled until all particles are in the same quantum state. Although photons are the most common boson of them all, they are easily created or destroyed when they interact with other matter – making it very difficult to cool photons to form a condensate. But that did not deter Martin Weitz and colleagues at the University of Bonn, who got round this problem by continuously pumping the BEC with a laser to make up for lost photons. Beyond the pure chutzpah of making the BEC, the breakthrough could actually help boost the performance of solar cells.

7th place: Relativity with a human touch

Seventh place in our league table goes to physicists in the US who have shown us the human face of relativity. James Chin-Wen Chou and colleagues at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) used two of the world’s most accurate optical clocks to show that time speeds up in a clock that is hoisted a mere 33 cm above the other. They also saw time slow down in a clock moving less than about 35 km/h relative to its twin. While there’s nothing groundbreaking about the physics – Einstein’s theories of relatively are on very solid ground – it’s reassuring that its effects can be seen at human distances and speeds.

8th place: Towards a Star Wars telepresence

Anyone who uses physics to realize a scene from Star Wars deserves a place in our top 10, which is why Nasser Peyghambarian and collegues at the University of Arizona and Nitto Denko Technical Corporation come in at number eight. In 1977 audiences were wowed by the special effects in that cinematic classic, which included a hologram of Princess Leia making a distress call to Obi-Wan Kenobi. Now, Peyghambarian and team have taken a big step towards making such real-time, dynamic holograms a reality by inventing a photorefractive polymer screen that reacts very quickly to laser light.

9th place: Proton is smaller than we thought

Physicists have been making measurements of protons for more than 90 years so you would have thought its size would be settled. But this year an international team led by Randolf Pohl at the Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics discovered that the proton is about 4% smaller than previously thought – bagging ninth place in our list. The surprising result was obtained by studying “muonic” hydrogen in which the electron is replaced by a much heavier muon. The finding could mean that physicists need to rethink how they apply the theory of quantum electrodynamics (QED) – or even that the theory itself needs a major overhaul.

10th place: CERN achieves landmark collisions

We couldn’t have a top 10 list that does not include the significant breakthroughs in accelerator technology at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider (LHC). In March, LHC physicists achieved the first 7 TeV proton–proton collisions ever achieved in a particle accelerator. And what’s more, in November the LHC moved seamlessly into the business of colliding lead ions in a successful bid to recreate the conditions of just after the Big Bang. Both runs generated copious amounts of data that will keep physicists busy until the accelerator starts up again next year.

Copyright © 2026 by IOP Publishing Ltd and individual contributors