Skip to the content

Sign up

To enjoy free access to all high-quality "In depth" content, including topical features, reviews and opinion sign up

Share this

Blog

The hunt for “God’s particle”?!

By Jon Cartwright

We have Leon Lederman to blame. For the “God particle”, that is. Since he published his 1993 book, The God Particle: If the Universe Is the Answer, What Is the Question?, the layperson might be forgiven for believing the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is not searching for a particle called the Higgs boson, but a path to spiritual enlightenment.

Many physicists hate referring to Him. For some particle physicists, the “God particle” belittles the hoards of other theoretical particles that might be detected at the LHC. They say it reveals little of the particle’s function, and is savoured by writers with little rhetoric. For some non-particle physicists, the God particle epitomizes the hype that surrounds particle physics. Then there are those who think divine connotations are always a bad idea.

Are they, though? When a furore about the use of “God particle” began bouncing around the blogsphere last August, mostly in response to an article written by Dennis Overbye of the New York Times in which he defended the term, several agreed that religious metaphors should be an acceptable part of our language. Einstein used them all the time (e.g. “Quantum mechanics…yields much, but it hardly brings us close to the secrets of the Old One”) yet historians tend to conclude he was not a theist. Even when I began writing this blog entry I thought I might be clever and refer to the Higgs as the light at the end of the LHC’s tunnel — before I reminded myself that the Higgs is not the only particle of import they expect to find.

As Sean Carroll noted on the Cosmic Variance blog, it is a fear of pandering to the religious right that is driving the expulsion of religious metaphors. If certain atheists succeed, religious metaphors will go the way of the dodo. The God particle is not one of the best, but it might be one of the last.

Which brings me to the point of this entry (not that Earth-shattering, I’ll warn you now). This morning I was looking at the news links posted on the Interactions website, only to find one from the Guardian newspaper headlined “The hunt for God’s particle”. That’s right — you read it right the first time. “God’s particle”? Where’s the metaphor in that? Have we now come full-circle, having compared the search for the Higgs boson to the path for spiritual enlightenment, only to reduce it to another of God’s creations?

Poor old Lederman must wonder what he started.

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.iop.org/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/646

Comments (19)

  • 1 Cormac O'Raifeartaigh Jun 5, 2008 4:22 PM

    Good post! I too think there was an over-reaction to the use of this term - but God's particle, that's a bit worrying..

    Did you know the expression 'God particle' was originally 'that goddamn particle?'. I can't remember where I found this nugget of information, possibly in Lederman's book...
    Regards
    Cormac

  • 2 Guillermo Guerrero Rodríguez Jun 6, 2008 3:17 AM

    Pienso que es comprensible que los físicos estén un poco molestos con la metáfora, que quizás ya no es metáfora para algunos, acerca del Boson Higgs
    Sin embargo la metáfora ha tenido una gran virtud: ha despertado el interés de millones personas en el LHC y en la física de las partículas, ha acercado entonces la física de las partículas a la gente común y corriente para las que la física es una ciencia hermetica.
    En mi caso me ha abierto una serie de puertas hacia el conocimiento a nivel de divulgación y los desafíos que enfrenta la física, sus incertidumbres, sus incoherencias y su lucha por conocer el universo que nos rodea.
    Creo en suma que se está produciendo una situación casi mágica en la que todos esperamos el LHC encuentre el boson de Higgs, se confirme la supersimtería, sepamos si existe o no la materia y la energía oscura, ¿y porque no? los universo múltiples… gran tarea.
    Si alguna cosa yo quisiera es estar allí con UDS y ver como lo hacen.
    Les deseo muy buena suerte … con el favor de Dios.
    Guillermo Guerrero/ Santiago / Chile

  • 3 GRAZNIDO Jun 6, 2008 3:28 AM

    DISCULPEN POR ESCRIBIR EN ESPAÑOL ES MI LENGUA NATAL, EL INGLÉS LO CONOZCO POCO EN ESCRITURA.

    Pienso que es comprensible que los físicos estén un poco molestos con la metáfora, que quizás ya no es metáfora para algunos, acerca del Boson Higgs
    Sin embargo la metáfora ha tenido una gran virtud: ha despertado el interés de millones personas en el LHC y en la física de las partículas, ha acercado entonces la física de las partículas a la gente común y corriente para las que la física es una ciencia hermetica.
    En mi caso me ha abierto una serie de puertas hacia el conocimiento a nivel de divulgación y los desafíos que enfrenta la física, sus incertidumbres, sus incoherencias y su lucha por conocer el universo que nos rodea.
    Creo en suma que se está produciendo una situación casi mágica en la que todos esperamos el LHC encuentre el boson de Higgs, se confirme la supersimtería, sepamos si existe o no la materia y la energía oscura, ¿y porque no? los universo múltiples… gran tarea.
    Si alguna cosa yo quisiera es estar allí con UDS y ver como lo hacen.
    Les deseo muy buena suerte … con el favor de Dios.
    Guillermo Guerrero/ Santiago / Chile

  • 4 JTankers Jun 6, 2008 5:09 AM

    I don't know if the God Particle will be found, but we do expect to possibly create micro black holes, possibly at a rate of one per second!

    But fear not, CERN has announced that they have completed a new safety theory that will be released soon which theoretically proves what they have always said, "no risk" from this experiment.

    Why would anyone even think that creating micro black holes on Earth might be dangerous?

    In order to be dangerous BOTH of the following would have to be incorrect!

    A. Evaporation (The theory that black holes might evaporate was invented more than 30 years ago, never verified though... Actually several recent studies determined that there was no compelling reason to believe that micro black holes really would evaporate. So maybe, maybe not.)

    B. Grow linearly, slowly (CERN believes this is the case, that is their theory. But then Dr. Otto E. Rossler could be correct that they might grow exponentially. He published some apparently compelling math to back up the theory. So again an open question...).

    But CERN has assure the public that there is no risk, and they will release the report that has been completed soon that will support "no risk". Of course they have been saying that the report would be imminently released for quite a few months actually. So perhaps that is an open question too.

    Learn more at LHCFacts.org
    (you just might help save a planet)

  • 5 Anchor Jun 6, 2008 5:14 AM

    Yes, this isn't an earth-shattering issue, but it makes one wonder why so many seem so unnerved by it. Judging by the frequency of apologetic comments throughout the physics blogosphere of late that see "over-reaction" in this sordid escapade, it seems the BACK-reaction is far more vigorous.

    At the time Lederman's book came out, there was grumbling, sure. And why not? Hardly "over-reaction". What's wrong with reacting? Why shouldn't anybody be free to react? Why is any negative reaction, however mild and earnestly posed, automatically characterized as an "OVER-reaction"?

    Now that the original inane metaphor has mutated (many would say inevitably) into the hideous "God's Particle", a suitably strong reaction seems entirely justified and appropriate. How's this to start: Particle physics has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with that religious belief in that notion popularly referred to as "God".

    If it did, physicists wouldn't need to consult nature directly with experiments. All they'd have to do is consult religious authorities, who allegedly already have all the answers. (And, btw, I havn't seen any atheists using ludicrous metaphors either. I don't wonder why that is).

    SOMEBODY's got to say it.

    Now I must satisfy an overwhelming compulsion to shower with antibacterial soap and a good stiff scrub brush.

  • 6 Terry W. Brookman Jun 6, 2008 6:27 AM

    To find a god particle you would need to penetrate a black hole, that is where ultimate density if found. This is a very weighty subject and one we may never understand.Yes I am getting a good laugh out of this. If I understand the god thought then the moment matter appears then it is not a part of god a further thought is that you can not make something out of nothing and I am a dog chasing it's tail!

  • 7 Terry W. Brookman Jun 6, 2008 6:34 AM

    By crunching together particles at high speed and energy, the machine is designed to recreate conditions that have not existed since just after the Big Bang. "This is a Genesis machine," theoretical physicist Professor Michio Kaku of City University in New York, says. "This machine will help us to unlock the secret of the origin of the universe. Just after the big bang is too late, think about just before!

  • 8 Pablo del Amo Jun 6, 2008 9:13 AM

    Unfortunately, religious metaphores such as "God particle" escape to most (non-science) journalists, for whom science is as misterious as another religion. As a result, you find prestigious publications, such as the Courier International in France, with the following title in their cover: "God, is he a particle?"
    http://www.courrierinternational.com/hebdo/sommaire.asp?obj_id=623
    Can it get more misleading to eyes of a lay person?

  • 9 Usman Saeed Jun 6, 2008 10:24 AM

    It is precisely the reason that the former US president once said, "physicists have found evidence for God in their equations". If Leon is the reason for particle physics being painted as God physics, then he deserves all this treatment by the physics community.

  • 10 Kudzu Fire Jun 6, 2008 12:35 PM

    I wonder about "God Particles" in the sense that of one of those wild speculations that sometimes come about like: what if that starts a chain reaction and sets the atmosphere on fire? Gee, if one of those crackpot minority reports is every right...Well look on the bright side. The crackpots will only be right...once.

  • 11 Graznido Jun 6, 2008 3:22 PM

    ¿La maquina del Génesis?, ¿La partícula de Dios?, ¿La partícula celestial?, ¿La máquina del fin de la historia (Black Holes)?.
    Fascinante escenario, yo creo que el día que los haces de hadrones del LHC impacten uno contra otro la humanidad estará muy atenta, así como van las cosas tendrá un rating más alto que champions lige o que las elecciones presidenciales en EEUU.
    Dicen que la poesía y la física tienen mucho que conversar, la física es sueños, la física crea representaciones que crean mundos como lo dijo N. Goodman, lo que estas metáforas acerca de Dios están demostrando, es que la religión también quiere conversar con la física como lo desea Ratzinger.
    Todos quieren conversar con la física de las partículas, todos queremos saber más, queremos que nos cuenten porque de alguna forma los físicos son la punta de lanza de la humanidad en la búsqueda de Dios o el orden de las cosas si es que alguno hay.

    Guillermo Guerrero / Santiago / Chile

  • 12 andreicio Jun 6, 2008 3:41 PM

    I think Dr. Higgs deserves to have the particle named after him. Lederman was just pulling a publication stunt to attach his name to the discovery. It is a classic example of a shock value publication.

  • 13 Jimbo Jun 6, 2008 4:45 PM

    THE BEST things that could happen at the LHC are:
    1. micro-black holes - first expt. data on quantum gravity would empower development of a subject yearning for a grounding in reality.
    2. NO Higgs - This would shake up the Std.Model, which needs such, as it is brimming over with inconsistencies. Its absence would silence the science journalists who babble incoherently about Lederman's "god particle".

    Journalists & Lederman used it to garner readership from the moronic majority who must put all science in a religous context.

  • 14 Gary Ansorge Jun 7, 2008 7:56 PM

    JTankers. what don't you understand about the energy generated at the LHC? It's 10^12 electron volts. That is one billion times LESS than the strongest detected cosmic rays and since we've been experiencing such for billions of years and are still here that must say something about the possible micro black holes that can form and how they DON'T interact with matter.

    Gary 7

  • 15 Aiya-Oba Jun 8, 2008 4:48 PM

    The grand physics of philosophy and religion is that; Equator of self-contradiction (gluon of pair), is the Absolute Logic and quantum of self-creation of Spacetime-Continuum(Cosmos).-Aiya-Oba (Poet/Philosopher).

    Hence, the absolute logic of All in all:

    (2A + B) + (2B + A)... = 3(A + B).

    where A and B, can be any non-zero integer, but never both zero.

  • 16 andreicio Jun 9, 2008 3:48 AM

    I dont't think any of you should be affraid of the LHC dangers. That's simply because it will never start. The start date delays seem endless. Gone is the month of May and . . . SHOCK and SURPRISE the LHC is nowhere near a start. A change of management and a good personnel purge is highly recemended. I reccomend Donald Rumsfeld as director.

  • 17 alan warren Jun 11, 2008 4:13 PM

    As Rumsfeld said its the unknown unknowns that we need to be weary about. So the LHC is an instrument for testing BIG unknown unknown's.
    I hope we like the answers to some of the questions we are about to ask it.

  • 18 sunil Jun 12, 2008 4:47 PM

    Real question is whether physicists associated with the project can afford to come with a definite result?

    If they do, then the biggest hope of an International project for detection of Higgs Boson will be gone forever and if they they come out and declare that the project has failed then hopes for any more funding will be shattered.

    All we can hope for is a prolonged delay in announcing the results as the processing of data required may take time. Even then, the result may be just good enough to justify a bigger project.

    All the talk about mini black holes is just media hype.

  • 19 alena Sep 22, 2008 7:23 PM

    Today's world is all upside down.While we are wasting millions of dollars on finding 'God' particle', there are millions of people dying of hunger and illnesses, that have been pretty much created by man and their 'science'...Could not we just listen and work with nature rather then keep poking it?!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Your comments