Skip to the content

Sign up

To enjoy free access to all high-quality "In depth" content, including topical features, reviews and opinion sign up

Share this

Blog

Film review: Eyes on the Skies

guidestar.jpg
Image of the European Very Large Telescope credit ESO/Y Beletsky

If the telescope had never been invented, the known universe would consist of six planets, one moon, and a few thousand stars. It’s therefore fitting that one of the “official” products of the International Year of Astronomy 2009 (IYA2009) should be a film history of this astoundingly important device.

Unfortunately, Eyes on the Skies is not so much a film as an hour-long public relations special, with the sheer weight of official approval — it’s a joint production of IYA2009, the International Astronomical Union, the European Space Agency, and the European Southern Observatory — tending to smother its occasional flashes of character. True, there are a few exceptions, particularly in the first two chapters, which cover the telescope’s history from Galileo’s sketches to the 5 m Hale Telescope on Mount Palomar in California. We learn, for example, that legal disputes prevented anyone from earning a patent on the telescope, and that William Herschel’s biggest scope required four servants to operate its complicated system of ropes and pulleys. A little later, presenter Joe Liske of the European Southern Observatory — known here, rather cringe-makingly, as “Dr J” — does a fine job of explaining in simple terms why reflecting telescopes can be bigger than refractors.

Once we reach the modern era, however, the slick artists’ impressions take over. At this point, Eyes on the Skies becomes a visually-stunning laundry list of ambitious projects, and its determination not to leave any of them out detracts from the overall story. The film’s website suggests that it could be shown at “public events carried out by educators, science centres, planetariums, amateur astronomers etc.”, but even with this audience in mind, one suspects that its producers might have been better off just sticking microphones in front of a handful of astronomers and asking them about their work. Indeed, the diverse group of bloggers over at IYA2009’s own Cosmic Diary website would have been a good place to start. In their case, “official” status has not lessened their passion or creativity, and they are far better ambassadors for astronomy than this beautiful but bland production.

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.iop.org/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/3352

Comments (4)

  • 1 Thomas Goodey Jul 31, 2009 9:02 AM

    "If the telescope had never been invented, the known universe would consist of six planets, one moon, and a few thousand stars." Not true. Some very keen-sighted people can see the four big moons of Jupiter with their naked eyes. (As mentioned by Jules Verne in 'Five Weeks in a Balloon').

  • 2 Margaret Harris Author Profile Page Jul 31, 2009 2:14 PM

    Interesting idea, Thomas! I looked into this, and it seems there's quite a lot of apocryphal tales (and at least one proven fraud) about naked-eye viewing of Jupiter's moons. The French optics pioneer Francois Arago also did some experiments back in the mid-19th century in which he managed to see one of the moons - probably Ganymede - with a unity-magnification telescope.

    So in principle, you're right. However, there's no evidence that anyone claimed to see the moons before Galileo found them using a telescope, so on balance I'll stand by my original statement. After all, I can see the Andromeda galaxy with my naked eye, but I only know what I'm looking at because of Hubble's (telescope-aided) discoveries.

  • 3 S2 Aug 1, 2009 2:44 PM

    It was William Herschel, not Thomas ...

  • 4 Margaret Harris Author Profile Page Aug 3, 2009 3:14 PM

    Thanks -- I've made the correction.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Your comments