A new study using data from a space mission suggests that most of Mercury’s crustal magnetic fields can be explained by iron and other magnetized rocks in the crust responding to the planet’s weak present-day core magnetic field, rather than from an ancient field, as had been inferred previously. Mercury is the only solar-system planet other than Earth to possess both a global magnetic field arising from its core and a crustal magnetic field resulting from rocks that were magnetized in either the present-day or an ancient core field. Present-day (induced) magnetization reveals the location and amount of iron in the crust, whereas ancient (remanent) magnetization records the planet’s dynamo history.
NASA’s MErcury, Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry and Ranging (MESSENGER) mission observed the planet in 2011–2015. Data from the mission are allowing scientists to explore the strength and distribution of Mercury’s magnetic field. During the mission, a last-minute decision was made “to reduce the orbit altitude thereby allowing crustal fields to be detected” explains Lon Hood at the Lunar and Planetary Laboratory at the University of Arizona. He has worked extensively on Mercury’s crustal magnetism using the MESSENGER data but was not involved in the new study.
Crustal magnetism was expected to be “partly due to remanent magnetization dating from the time when the crustal sources formed in the planetary magnetic field,” Hood says. This interpretation is drawn from earlier analyses of the mission data. But a key challenge in understanding the crustal magnetic field remained – how to delineate the contributions of induced and remanent magnetization. Separating the relative contributions of ancient and present-day induced magnetization on the crustal magnetic field can reveal new ways of understanding the spatial abundance of magnetic rocks, variations of magnetic properties of crustal minerals, and the dynamo history of Mercury.
New insights from old data
The new study, led by Catherine Johnson at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, uses field observations of Mercury’s crustal magnetic fields from MESSENGER to develop a magnetization model of the planet and identify sources of its magnetization. The researchers calculated the expected induced magnetization strength using the low-altitude observations with assumptions on the crustal thickness, magnetic mineralogy, iron content, and the present-day core field.
In line with previous studies, the researchers found that the largest magnetization strengths occur in the Caloris region, along with localized signals elsewhere. The spatial pattern of magnetization strength, however, does not consistently match the variation in near-surface iron content seen in MESSENGER spectroscopic data. Instead, magnetization strength correlates with crustal thickness, up to about 30 km, suggesting the magnetized rocks are concentrated within the upper part of the crust.
The researchers found that induced magnetization is relatively small, given the low iron content of the planet’s crust and its weak core field – about a hundred times weaker than Earth’s. Even so, they estimate that induced magnetization can fully account for the calculated magnetization strength across more than 85% of the area north of 38 °N. This assumes it extends through the crustal column to a depth of about 30 km, which means that no remanent magnetization is required to explain the observed crustal field over that majority of the mapped region. Areas where induced magnetization does not explain the observed crustal fields may be the result of iron delivered by ancient asteroid impacts, which would locally increase the induced magnetization. Elsewhere, a contribution from remanent magnetization may be required to explain the observed fields.
Towards better characterization
On Earth, the robust separation of induced and remanent magnetizations requires laboratory measurements of rock samples. For Mercury no such samples exist, so the magnetic properties of its crust must be inferred from satellite observations constrained by assumptions about the composition and magnetic behaviour of its rocks. The delineation in the new study depends on “assumptions about magnetic mineralogy that cannot be verified due to the lack of returned samples”, says Hood.
Solar wind and extreme heat creates ice on Mercury, say researchers
Better characterization of the crust’s low-field magnetic susceptibility – currently inferred from a limited number of laboratory measurements on meteorites and minerals believed to resemble Mercury’s crust – can advance our understanding of Mercury’s crustal fields. Better core-field models and higher-resolution iron maps from the European–Japanese BepiColombo mission could help. This mission comprises two spacecraft that launched in 2018 and is expected to run until 2029.
However, Hood says “there are no current plans for either spacecraft to approach near enough to the planet to detect or map more of the crustal magnetic field”. Although the spacecraft will eventually descend below 100 kilometres, giving us a first look at the southern hemisphere. Indeed, we may have a long wait before we have the complete picture because Hoods says, ” there are no plans to obtain samples of Mercury’s crustal rocks, which are needed to definitively determine the origin of the crustal magnetization”.
The researchers report their findings in PNAS.
